• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒性休克患者长期镇静使用右美托咪定单药方案与血管升压药需求减少相关:一项来自MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性队列研究

Dexmedetomidine only regimen for long-term sedation is associated with reduced vasopressor requirements in septic shock patients: A retrospective cohort study from MIMIC-IV database.

作者信息

Li Lulan, Shi Xiaotong, Xiong Ming, Kong Karen, Chen Zhongqing, Zhou Shiyu, Zeng Zhenhua, An Shengli, Xu Bo

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 27;10:1107251. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1107251. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1107251
PMID:36923011
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10010261/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that dexmedetomidine (DEX) may be associated with reduced vasopressor requirements in septic shock patients, however, long-term DEX-only sedation in reducing vasopressor requirements is still controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted among patients with septic shock on mechanical ventilation using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The primary outcome was the ratio of norepinephrine equivalent dose to mean arterial pressure (NEq/MAP) in the first 72 h after DEX or other sedatives for sedation. The secondary outcomes were key organ function parameters, 28-day mortality, and 90-day mortality. Univariate, propensity score matching (PSM), and generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

DEX was associated with decreased NEq/MAP in the first 72 h (difference = 0.05, 95% CI = -0.02-0.08,  = 0.002) after adjusting for confounders in the GLMM analysis. The DEX group was also associated with a lower heart rate, cardiac output (CO), lactate level, aspartate transaminase (AST) level, and higher PaO/FiO ratio ( < 0.0125). Moreover, DEX only sedation was associated with reduced 90-day mortality (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.37-0.94,  = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

DEX may be associated with decreased vasopressor requirements, improved AST and PaO/FiO levels, and reduced 90-day mortality in patients with septic shock, which warrants further study.

摘要

背景

既往研究表明,右美托咪定(DEX)可能与脓毒性休克患者血管升压药需求减少有关,然而,单纯长期使用DEX镇静以减少血管升压药需求仍存在争议。

方法

使用重症监护医学信息数据库IV(MIMIC-IV)对接受机械通气的脓毒性休克患者进行一项回顾性研究。主要结局是在使用DEX或其他镇静剂进行镇静后的前72小时内去甲肾上腺素等效剂量与平均动脉压的比值(NEq/MAP)。次要结局是关键器官功能参数、28天死亡率和90天死亡率。进行了单因素分析、倾向评分匹配(PSM)和广义线性混合模型(GLMM)分析。

结果

在GLMM分析中调整混杂因素后,DEX与前72小时内NEq/MAP降低相关(差异=0.05,95%CI=-0.02-0.08,P=0.002)。DEX组还与较低的心率、心输出量(CO)、乳酸水平、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)水平以及较高的PaO/FiO比值相关(P<0.0125)。此外,单纯使用DEX镇静与90天死亡率降低相关(OR=0.60,95%CI=0.37-0.94,P=0.030)。

结论

DEX可能与脓毒性休克患者血管升压药需求减少、AST和PaO/FiO水平改善以及90天死亡率降低相关,这值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2833/10010261/fb60c2fa3e17/fmed-10-1107251-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2833/10010261/1a25fa5b4970/fmed-10-1107251-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2833/10010261/3b8ef5cadd0d/fmed-10-1107251-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2833/10010261/4ab37e8a1d3b/fmed-10-1107251-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2833/10010261/fb60c2fa3e17/fmed-10-1107251-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2833/10010261/1a25fa5b4970/fmed-10-1107251-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2833/10010261/3b8ef5cadd0d/fmed-10-1107251-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2833/10010261/4ab37e8a1d3b/fmed-10-1107251-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2833/10010261/fb60c2fa3e17/fmed-10-1107251-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Dexmedetomidine only regimen for long-term sedation is associated with reduced vasopressor requirements in septic shock patients: A retrospective cohort study from MIMIC-IV database.脓毒性休克患者长期镇静使用右美托咪定单药方案与血管升压药需求减少相关:一项来自MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 27;10:1107251. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1107251. eCollection 2023.
2
The effect of dexmedetomidine on vasopressor requirements in patients with septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation [SPICE III] Trial.右美托咪定对感染性休克患者血管加压素需求的影响:镇静实践在重症监护评估 [SPICE III] 试验的亚组分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Jul 16;24(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03115-x.
3
[Comparative study of dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam on plasma catecholamine levels and hemodynamics in patients with septic shock].右美托咪定与咪达唑仑对感染性休克患者血浆儿茶酚胺水平及血流动力学影响的对比研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Oct;33(10):1193-1197. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210119-00105.
4
Effect of early vasopressin combined with norepinephrine on short-term mortality in septic shock: A retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性研究:早期血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素对脓毒性休克短期死亡率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;69:188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.040. Epub 2023 May 3.
5
A Non-Comparative Prospective Pilot Study of Ketamine for Sedation in Adult Septic Shock.氯胺酮用于成人感染性休克镇静的非对照前瞻性初步研究。
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e409-e413. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy121.
6
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
7
Effects of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on outcomes in critically ill patients with different sedation depths: a propensity score-weighted cohort study.右美托咪定与丙泊酚对不同镇静深度危重症患者结局的影响:一项倾向评分加权队列研究。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024 Dec;43(6):101425. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101425. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
8
Mean arterial pressure to norepinephrine equivalent dose ratio for predicting renal replacement therapy requirement: a retrospective analysis from the MIMIC-IV.平均动脉压与去甲肾上腺素等效剂量比预测肾脏替代治疗需求:来自 MIMIC-IV 的回顾性分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jun;56(6):2065-2074. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03908-3. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
9
Evaluation of dexmedetomidine therapy for sedation in patients with toxicological events at an academic medical center.评价在学术医疗中心发生中毒事件的患者应用右美托咪定镇静治疗的效果。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014 Jun;52(5):525-30. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.913175. Epub 2014 May 5.
10
Timing of vasopressin initiation and mortality in patients with septic shock: analysis of the MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV databases.血管加压素起始时机与感染性休克患者死亡率的关系:对 MIMIC-III 和 MIMIC-IV 数据库的分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08147-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain, lactate, and anesthetics: intertwined regulators of tumor metabolism and immunity.疼痛、乳酸与麻醉剂:肿瘤代谢与免疫的相互交织的调节因子。
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 17;15:1534300. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1534300. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of mechanical ventilation on clinical outcomes in ICU-admitted Alzheimer's disease patients: a retrospective cohort study.机械通气对 ICU 收治的阿尔茨海默病患者临床结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 27;12:1368508. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368508. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between dexmedetomidine administration and outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.右美托咪定给药与脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤危重症患者结局的关联。
J Clin Anesth. 2022 Dec;83:110960. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110960. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
2
[Comparative study of dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam on plasma catecholamine levels and hemodynamics in patients with septic shock].右美托咪定与咪达唑仑对感染性休克患者血浆儿茶酚胺水平及血流动力学影响的对比研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Oct;33(10):1193-1197. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210119-00105.
3
The role of the vagus nerve on dexmedetomidine promoting survival and lung protection in a sepsis model in rats.
迷走神经在右美托咪定促进脓毒症大鼠生存和肺保护中的作用。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 5;914:174668. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174668. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
4
Is the Sympathetic System Detrimental in the Setting of Septic Shock, with Antihypertensive Agents as a Counterintuitive Approach? A Clinical Proposition.在感染性休克的情况下,交感神经系统是否有害,使用抗高血压药物作为一种有悖常理的方法是否可行?一项临床提议。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 1;10(19):4569. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194569.
5
Evaluating the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Status of Patients with Septic Shock Admitted to Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.评估右美托咪定对入住重症监护病房的感染性休克患者血流动力学状态的影响:一项单盲随机对照试验。
Iran J Pharm Res. 2020 Fall;19(4):255-263. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2019.112343.13699.
6
Dexmedetomidine ameliorates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in vivo and in vitro by preserving mitochondrial dynamic equilibrium through the HIF-1a/HO-1 signaling pathway.右美托咪定通过HIF-1α/HO-1信号通路维持线粒体动态平衡,从而在体内和体外改善内毒素诱导的急性肺损伤。
Redox Biol. 2021 May;41:101954. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101954. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
7
Septic shock, noradrenaline requirements and alpha-2 agonists: Fishing in the right pond?脓毒性休克、去甲肾上腺素需求与α-2激动剂:找对方向了吗?
Crit Care. 2021 Feb 9;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03377-5.
8
Dexmedetomidine withdrawal syndrome and opioid sensitivity.右美托咪定戒断综合征与阿片类药物敏感性
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Oct;13(e1):e105-e107. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002705. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
9
The effect of dexmedetomidine on vasopressor requirements in patients with septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation [SPICE III] Trial.右美托咪定对感染性休克患者血管加压素需求的影响:镇静实践在重症监护评估 [SPICE III] 试验的亚组分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Jul 16;24(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03115-x.
10
Are other effects of dexmedetomidine playing a role in explaining norepinephrine requirements decrease in septic shock patients?右美托咪定的其他作用是否在解释脓毒症休克患者去甲肾上腺素需求量降低方面发挥作用?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Jan;87(1):107-108. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14725-4. Epub 2020 May 28.