Suppr超能文献

牙种植体及支持式修复体的机械故障:一项系统评价。

Mechanical failures of dental implants and supported prostheses: A systematic review.

作者信息

Verma Aditi, Singh Saumyendra Vikram, Arya Deeksha, Shivakumar Sahana, Chand Pooran

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George's Medical University UP, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Public Health Dentistry, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, People's University Bhopal Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;13(2):306-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Though, mechanical dental implant and supported prosthesis failures are considered significant, a comprehensive evaluation is lacking. A systematic review analyzing different aspects related to such failures was therefore done.

METHODS

Electronic search was carried out in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library for articles published between 1981 and 2021. Articles were selected using predefined criteria. Data extraction was based on mechanical complications associated with dental implants, prosthetic implant failures, survival rate of implants, mechanical failure of implants placed in the maxilla and mandible, and mechanical complications associated with implant supported over dentures. Quality of included studies was assessed. Meta-analysis for heterogenicity testing, publication bias and implant failure assessment was conducted using MedCalc® Statistical Software version 19.7.

RESULTS

Eighteen retrospective and prospective studies were included following PRISMA guidelines. Mechanical complications were more in the initial 9 years but reduced later. Abutment screw loosening was one of the more common mechanical complications (16.21%). Maxillary implant failure was greater compared to mandibular implant failure with an odds ratio of 4.66 (95% CI -3.21- 6.75). Failure of implant supported overdentures due to mechanical complications were 3% in the fixed effect, and 2.9% in the random effect model ( < 0.05). The overall prevalence of mechanical failure was between 5.6% and 7.7% (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Mechanical failures of implant and supported prosthesis have similar prevalence to biological and esthetic failures, and therefore need to be given due credence. Identifying specific factors contributing to such failures can help reduce incidence.

摘要

目的

尽管口腔种植体及支持式修复体的机械性失败被认为很严重,但仍缺乏全面评估。因此,进行了一项系统综述,分析与此类失败相关的不同方面。

方法

在PubMed/MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆中进行电子检索,查找1981年至2021年发表的文章。根据预定义标准选择文章。数据提取基于与牙种植体相关的机械并发症、种植修复体失败、种植体存活率、上颌和下颌种植体的机械性失败以及种植体支持的覆盖义齿相关的机械并发症。评估纳入研究的质量。使用MedCalc®统计软件19.7版进行异质性检验、发表偏倚和种植体失败评估的荟萃分析。

结果

按照PRISMA指南纳入了18项回顾性和前瞻性研究。机械并发症在最初9年较多,但后来减少。基台螺丝松动是较常见的机械并发症之一(16.21%)。上颌种植体失败率高于下颌种植体失败率,优势比为4.66(95%CI -3.21至6.75)。种植体支持的覆盖义齿因机械并发症导致的失败在固定效应模型中为3%,在随机效应模型中为2.9%(P<0.05)。机械性失败的总体发生率在5.6%至7.7%之间(P<0.05)。

结论

种植体及支持式修复体的机械性失败发生率与生物学和美学失败相似,因此需要给予应有的重视。识别导致此类失败的具体因素有助于降低发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127a/10009286/760d44c902ac/ga1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验