It doesn't matter what they say in the papers… It's still ROC and roll to me.
作者信息
King William E, Sullivan Brynne A, Vesoulis Zachary A
机构信息
Medical Predictive Science Corporation, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
出版信息
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Feb 28;11(4):161. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-289. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
It doesn't matter what they say in the papers… It's still ROC and roll to me.报纸上怎么说都无所谓……对我来说依旧是摇滚不停。 （注：原文中“ROC and roll”可能是“rock and roll”的错误表述，按照正确表述翻译）
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Feb 28;11(4):161. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-289. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
2
Age doesn't matter unless you're a cheese: wisdom from our elders Age doesn't matter unless you're a cheese: wisdom from our elders Kathryn and Ross Petras Workman Publishing , New York 409pp £6.99 0761125183 0761125183 [Formula: see text].年龄无关紧要，除非你是一块奶酪：来自长辈的智慧 年龄无关紧要，除非你是一块奶酪：来自长辈的智慧 凯瑟琳和罗斯·佩特拉斯 沃克曼出版公司，纽约 409页 6.99英镑 0761125183 0761125183 [公式：见正文]
Nurs Older People. 2003 Mar 1;15(1):36. doi: 10.7748/nop.15.1.36.s20.
3
Commentary: selection bias as an explanation for the obesity paradox: just because it's possible doesn't mean it's plausible.评论：选择偏倚作为肥胖悖论的一种解释：仅仅因为有可能并不意味着它是合理的。
Epidemiology. 2014 Jan;25(1):4-6. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000013.
4
Just because it's reliable doesn't mean it's believable: A commentary on two articles by Birkimer and Brown.仅仅因为它可靠并不意味着它可信：对伯克默和布朗两篇文章的评论
J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Winter;12(4):553-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-553.
5
6
Just Because It's Published Doesn't Mean It's Perfect: The Continuing Evolution of the Peer Review Process.仅仅因为它已发表并不意味着它是完美的：同行评审过程的持续演变。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Oct;122(10):1958-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.006.
7
Just because it's low cost doesn't mean it's accessible.仅仅因为成本低并不意味着它易于获取。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1233-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2151-0.
8
On call. I've had my PSA tested every year since 1992 and I'm happy to say it's always been normal. But now my doctor doesn't want to do the test anymore because I'm 78 years old. Should I go to another doctor for my test?随时待命。自1992年以来，我每年都进行前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）检测，我很高兴地说结果一直正常。但现在我的医生不想再给我做这项检测了，因为我已经78岁了。我应该去找另一位医生做这项检测吗？
Harv Mens Health Watch. 2000 Dec;5(5):8.
9
Just because it's on the market doesn't mean it's smart to buy.仅仅因为它在市场上并不意味着购买它是明智的。
Med Netw Strategy Rep. 1998 Jan;7(1):10-1.
10
It's Hard, But it Doesn't Have to Be, A Commentary on "It's Hard": Adolescents' experience attending school with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.这很难，但不必如此，对《这很难》的评论：青少年患心因性非癫痫性发作时的上学经历
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Jul;132:108760. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108760. Epub 2022 May 28.
本文引用的文献
1
Adding heart rate n-variability (HRnV) to clinical assessment potentially improves prediction of serious bacterial infections in young febrile infants at the emergency department: a prospective observational study.将心率变异性（HRnV）添加到临床评估中，可能会改善急诊科对发热婴幼儿严重细菌感染的预测：一项前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jan 15;11(1):6. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3303. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
2
Artificial and human intelligence for early identification of neonatal sepsis.用于早期识别新生儿败血症的人工智能和人类智能
Pediatr Res. 2023 Jan;93(2):350-356. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02274-7. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
3
Improving child health through Big Data and data science.通过大数据和数据科学改善儿童健康。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Jan;93(2):342-349. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02264-9. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
A neonatal sequential organ failure assessment score predicts mortality to late-onset sepsis in preterm very low birth weight infants.新生儿序贯器官衰竭评估评分可预测极早产儿晚发型败血症的死亡率。
Pediatr Res. 2020 Jul;88(1):85-90. doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0517-2. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
5
Effectiveness of rapid response teams in reducing intrahospital cardiac arrests and deaths: a systematic review and meta-analysis.快速反应小组在减少院内心脏骤停和死亡方面的有效性：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Jul-Sept;30(3):366-375. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180049.
6
Heart rate variability as predictor of mortality in sepsis: A systematic review.心率变异性对脓毒症患者死亡率的预测作用：系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):e0203487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203487. eCollection 2018.
7
Heart rate variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2 型糖尿病患者的心率变异性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 2;13(4):e0195166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195166. eCollection 2018.
8
Why should we not use APACHE II for performance measurement and benchmarking?为什么我们不应该使用急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II（APACHE II）进行绩效评估和基准测试？
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):268-270. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170043. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
9
Adaptation and Validation of a Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of the Sepsis-3 Definitions in Critically Ill Children.儿童序贯器官衰竭评估评分的适应性与验证及危重症儿童中脓毒症-3定义的评估
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 2;171(10):e172352. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2352.
10
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
Zotero 插件