Why should we not use APACHE II for performance measurement and benchmarking?
作者信息
Soares Marcio, Dongelmans Dave A
机构信息
Departamento de Terapia Intensiva, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.
Departamento de Terapia Intensiva, Centro Médico Acadêmico, University of Amsterdam - Amsterdã, Holanda.
出版信息
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):268-270. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170043. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why should we not use APACHE II for performance measurement and benchmarking?为什么我们不应该使用急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II（APACHE II）进行绩效评估和基准测试？
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):268-270. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170043. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
2
Small steps beyond benchmarking.超越基准的小步骤。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Apr-Jun;29(2):128-130. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170022.
3
Benchmarking for best practice in critical care medicine: can it realistically be done?重症医学最佳实践的基准评估：它真的可行吗？
Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997 Jul-Aug;2(4):154-61.
4
Benchmarking outcome in ICU.重症监护病房的结果基准评估
Ir Med J. 2005 Jul-Aug;98(7):213-5.
5
Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的疾病严重程度评分系统。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):163-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f96f81.
6
Critical care performance measurement: the time has come for all.重症监护绩效评估：对所有人来说时机已到。
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1538-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000216184.53553.DC.
7
A comparison of predictive outcomes of APACHE II and SAPS II in a surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房中急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II（APACHE II）与简化急性生理学评分系统II（SAPS II）预测结果的比较。
Am J Med Qual. 2001 Sep-Oct;16(5):161-5. doi: 10.1177/106286060101600503.
8
Expanding a performance improvement initiative in critical care from hospital to system.将重症监护领域的绩效改进计划从医院层面扩展至系统层面。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Aug;28(8):419-34. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28042-6.
9
UHC operations improvement: adult ICU benchmarking project summary. University HealthSystem Consortium.联合健康保险业务改进：成人重症监护病房基准项目总结。大学卫生系统联盟。
Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997 Jul-Aug;2(4):147-53.
10
[Validation of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III scoring system and comparison with APACHE II in German intensive care units].[急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估（APACHE）III评分系统的验证及在德国重症监护病房与APACHE II的比较]
Anaesthesist. 1998 Jan;47(1):30-8. doi: 10.1007/s001010050519.
引用本文的文献
1
Development and Validation of the Hospital Medicine Safety Sepsis Initiative Mortality Model.发展和验证医院医学安全脓毒症倡议死亡率模型。
Chest. 2024 Nov;166(5):1035-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3769. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
It doesn't matter what they say in the papers… It's still ROC and roll to me.报纸上怎么说都无所谓……对我来说依旧是摇滚不停。 （注：原文中“ROC and roll”可能是“rock and roll”的错误表述，按照正确表述翻译）
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Feb 28;11(4):161. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-289. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
Performance of NUTRIC score to predict 28-day mortality in critically ill patients after replacing APACHE II with SAPS 3.NUTRIC 评分在替代 APACHE II 为 SAPS 3 后预测危重症患者 28 天死亡率的性能。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 1;17(7):e0270455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270455. eCollection 2022.
4
Reduced physical functional performance before hospitalization predicts life support limitations and mortality in nonsurgical intensive care unit patients.住院前身体功能表现下降可预测非外科重症监护病房患者的生命支持限制和死亡率。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Jan-Mar;34(1):166-175. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220011-pt.
5
Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Critically Ill Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant (CrKP): A Cohort Study from Developing Country.耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌（CrKP）重症患者的临床特征及危险因素：一项来自发展中国家的队列研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Dec 20;14:5555-5562. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S343489. eCollection 2021.
6
Improvement of APACHE II score system for disease severity based on XGBoost algorithm.基于 XGBoost 算法的 APACHE II 评分系统疾病严重程度的改进。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01591-x.
7
Validation of APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores in in-hospital and one year mortality prediction in a mixed intensive care unit in Poland: a cohort study.验证 APACHE II、APACHE III 和 SAPS II 评分在波兰混合重症监护病房住院和一年死亡率预测中的应用：一项队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01203-7.
8
Is APACHE II a useful tool for clinical research?急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II（APACHE II）是临床研究的有用工具吗？
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):264-267. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170046.
本文引用的文献
1
Development and validation of the new ICNARC model for prediction of acute hospital mortality in adult critical care.用于预测成人重症监护病房急性医院死亡率的新型ICNARC模型的开发与验证。
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:335-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.031. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
2
Data Resource Profile: the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) Registry of Admissions to Adult Intensive Care Units.数据资源简介：荷兰成人重症监护病房入院情况国家重症监护评估（NICE）登记处
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;44(6):1850-1850h. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv291. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
3
External validation of the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) risk prediction model in critical care units in Scotland.重症监护国家审计与研究中心（ICNARC）风险预测模型在苏格兰重症监护病房的外部验证
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Dec 15;14:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-116. eCollection 2014.
4
ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM.重症监护病房疾病严重程度评分：急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统（APACHE）、简化急性生理学评分（SAPS）和死亡率预测模型（MPM）。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Oct;20(5):557-65. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000135.
5
External validation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV in Dutch intensive care units and comparison with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II.荷兰重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康评估 IV 的外部验证，并与急性生理学与慢性健康评估 II 和简化急性生理学评分 II 进行比较。
J Crit Care. 2011 Feb;26(1):105.e11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
6
Outcome prediction in critical care: the ICNARC model.重症监护中的预后预测：ICNARC模型。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Oct;14(5):506-12. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328310165a.
7
Outcome prediction in critical care: the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation models.重症监护中的预后预测：急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估模型
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Oct;14(5):491-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32830864c0.
8
A new risk prediction model for critical care: the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) model.一种用于重症监护的新风险预测模型：重症监护国家审计与研究中心（ICNARC）模型。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1091-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259468.24532.44.
9
Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome: an updated Mortality Probability Admission Model (MPM0-III).评估当代重症监护病房的预后：更新的死亡概率入院模型（MPM0-III）。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):827-35. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000257337.63529.9F.
10
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估（APACHE）IV：当今危重症患者的医院死亡率评估
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0.
Zotero 插件