Surakanti Amulya, Demory Beckler Michelle, Kesselman Marc M
Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Microbiology and Immunology, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Feb 11;15(2):e34860. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34860. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that is extremely prevalent in society. It affects more than 25% of Americans above the age of 18 years. According to July 2020 publication by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), osteoarthritis affects approximately 325 million Americans. One of the organs that is most affected by osteoarthritis is the knee. Over the years, we have developed non-surgical treatments, such as physical therapy (PT) and injections, and surgical treatments, such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and arthroscopic lavage, for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). If a patient fails with non-surgical options, which are tried first to avoid the risks of surgery, the patient may be considered for knee surgery. This article will investigate the different non-surgical options and TKA as treatment options for KOA based on current literature. The goal of this paper is to be a comprehensive resource for physicians and patients with KOA to make an informed decision. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed. The search terms were based on the type of treatments for KOA. To find articles that compared TKA to non-surgical treatments, the terms included "osteoarthritis", "total knee", and "non-surgical treatments," in combination. For other non-surgical treatments such as PT, weight reduction, and injections, a combination of the treatment, "osteoarthritis", and "knee" were included in the search. For the tier 1 process, any randomized controlled trials were included. Any case reports, observational studies, and cross-sectional studies were eliminated from the search. For the tier 2 review process, any articles that did not have relevance to the topic were eliminated after reading the abstracts of the articles. After review of the literature, the data seem to suggest that TKA with 12 weeks of non-surgical treatment improved pain and functionality of the knee more than just 12 weeks of non-surgical treatment when followed up at 12 and 24 months. However, non-surgical treatment before TKA delays the need for surgery. Supervised PT, either in a group or individual format, has been shown to delay TKA in 95% patients in the group that received PT at the end of one year. In addition, weight reduction has been shown as an effective strategy to improve pain and functionality in KOA patients, which decreases the urgency for surgery. Furthermore, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have been shown to have long-term symptomatic relief for KOA compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) and corticosteroid injections. However, HA and corticosteroid injections are beneficial in treating KOA more than receiving no treatment. Physicians often have difficulty deciding whether to pursue conservative or surgical treatment for patients with KOA. The non-surgical treatments explored in this review - PT, injections, and weight reduction - can provide symptomatic relief and, in some cases, delay the need for surgical intervention. However, based on some randomized clinical trials mentioned in the article, patients receiving TKA have more relief, better quality of life, and improved functionality compared to non-surgical therapy. However, a critical review of this important field of debate shows that there are limited randomized controlled studies comparing the effectiveness of TKA and non-surgical treatments for KOA. We believe that this controversial topic needs further clinical investigation.
骨关节炎是一种在社会中极为普遍的退行性关节疾病。它影响着超过25%的18岁以上美国人。根据疾病控制中心(CDC)2020年7月发布的数据,骨关节炎影响着约3.25亿美国人。膝关节是受骨关节炎影响最严重的器官之一。多年来,我们已经开发出了针对膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)的非手术治疗方法,如物理治疗(PT)和注射治疗,以及手术治疗方法,如全膝关节置换术(TKA)和关节镜灌洗术。如果患者在首先尝试的非手术治疗方案中失败,为避免手术风险,可能会考虑对其进行膝关节手术。本文将根据当前文献,研究不同的非手术治疗方案以及TKA作为KOA治疗选择的情况。本文的目的是为患有KOA的医生和患者提供全面的参考资料,以便他们做出明智的决定。使用PubMed进行了系统的文献检索。检索词基于KOA的治疗类型。为了找到比较TKA与非手术治疗的文章,检索词组合包括“骨关节炎”、“全膝关节”和“非手术治疗”。对于其他非手术治疗,如PT、减重和注射治疗,检索词组合包括治疗方法、“骨关节炎”和“膝关节”。对于一级筛选过程,纳入任何随机对照试验。检索过程中排除了所有病例报告、观察性研究和横断面研究。对于二级审查过程,在阅读文章摘要后,排除任何与主题无关的文章。在对文献进行审查后,数据似乎表明,在12个月和24个月随访时,接受12周非手术治疗后再进行TKA,比单纯进行12周非手术治疗能更好地改善膝关节疼痛和功能。然而,TKA前的非手术治疗会延迟手术需求。有监督的PT,无论是团体形式还是个体形式,在接受PT治疗一年后的患者组中,已被证明能使95%的患者延迟进行TKA。此外,减重已被证明是改善KOA患者疼痛和功能的有效策略,这降低了手术的紧迫性。此外,与透明质酸(HA)和皮质类固醇注射相比,富血小板血浆(PRP)注射已被证明对KOA有长期的症状缓解作用。然而,HA和皮质类固醇注射比不治疗对KOA更有益。对于KOA患者,医生在决定采用保守治疗还是手术治疗时往往存在困难。本综述中探讨的非手术治疗方法——PT、注射治疗和减重——可以缓解症状,在某些情况下,还能延迟手术干预的需求。然而,根据本文提到的一些随机临床试验,与非手术治疗相比,接受TKA的患者疼痛缓解更明显,生活质量更高,功能也得到改善。然而,对这一重要辩论领域的批判性审查表明,比较TKA和非手术治疗对KOA有效性的随机对照研究有限。我们认为,这个有争议的话题需要进一步的临床研究。