Pettersson Ante B V, Ballardini Rosa Maria, Mimler Marc, Li Phoebe, Salmi Mika, Minssen Timo, Gibson Ian, Mäkitie Antti
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Feb 27;11:1102780. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1102780. eCollection 2023.
3D printing has quickly found many applications in medicine. However, as with any new technology the regulatory landscape is struggling to stay abreast. Unclear legislation or lack of legislation has been suggested as being one hindrance for wide-scale adoption. A scoping review was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Westlaw International to identify articles dealing with legal issues in medical 3D printing. Thirty-four articles fulfilling inclusion criteria were identified in medical/technical databases and fifteen in the legal database. The majority of articles dealt with the USA, while the EU was also prominently represented. Some common unresolved legal issues were identified, among them terminological confusion between custom-made and patient-matched devices, lack of specific legislation for patient-matched products, and the undefined legal role of CAD files both from a liability and from an intellectual property standpoint. Data protection was mentioned only in two papers and seems an underexplored topic. In this scoping review, several relevant articles and several common unresolved legal issues were identified including a need for terminological uniformity in medical 3D printing. The results of this work are planned to inform our own deeper legal analysis of these issues in the future.
3D打印已迅速在医学领域得到诸多应用。然而,与任何新技术一样,监管环境正努力跟上步伐。立法不明确或缺乏立法被认为是广泛采用这项技术的一个障碍。我们在PubMed、科学网、Scopus和Westlaw International数据库中进行了一项范围综述,以识别涉及医学3D打印法律问题的文章。在医学/技术数据库中识别出34篇符合纳入标准的文章,在法律数据库中识别出15篇。大多数文章涉及美国,欧盟也有显著体现。识别出了一些常见的未解决法律问题,其中包括定制设备和患者匹配设备之间的术语混淆、缺乏针对患者匹配产品的具体立法,以及从责任和知识产权角度来看CAD文件的法律角色未明确界定。数据保护仅在两篇论文中被提及,似乎是一个未得到充分探讨的主题。在这项范围综述中,识别出了几篇相关文章以及几个常见的未解决法律问题,包括医学3D打印中术语统一的必要性。这项工作的结果计划在未来为我们对这些问题进行更深入的法律分析提供参考。