• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人员穿着个人防护装备的热生理反应:一座教育建筑半开放空间的实验研究。

Human thermal physiological response of wearing personal protective equipment: An educational building semi-open space experimental investigation.

机构信息

School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 15;877:162779. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162779. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162779
PMID:36924973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10014506/
Abstract

With the outbreak and spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, HCWs are frequently required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) for nucleic acid sample collection in semi-open transition spaces. Wearing PPE causes significant psychological and physical stress in HCWs. In this study, operative temperature (T) and wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) were used to assess thermal conditions through field experiments, while multiple physiological parameters were measured in the subjects. The results indicated that the subjects showed statistically significant differences in thermal perception and physiological parameters with and without PPE. Using observed increases in heart rate (HR), auditory canal temperature (T), mean skin temperature (MST), and end-tidal CO pressure, subjects were shown to have an increased metabolic rate and heat storage while wearing PPE. Additionally, a decrease in oxygen concentration was also observed, and this decrease may be linked to fatigue and cognitive impairment. Moreover, HR, MST, and T showed a significant linear relationship, which increased with temperature and operative temperature, and the HR response was stronger with PPE than without PPE. The neutral, preferred, and acceptable temperatures were significantly lower with PPE than without PPE, and the deviations for neutral T/WBGT were 9.5/7.1 °C and preferred T/WBGT was 2.2/4.0 °C, respectively. Moreover, the upper limits of acceptable WBGT, 29.4 °C with PPE and 20.4 °C without PPE, differed significantly between the two phases. Furthermore, the recorded physiological parameter responses and thermal perception responses of the subjects while wearing PPE indicated that they were at risk of thermal stress. Overall, these results suggest that people who wear PPE should focus on their health and thermal stress. This study provides a reference for the development of strategies to counteract heat stress and improve thermal comfort.

摘要

随着 COVID-19 疫情的爆发和传播,医护人员经常需要在半开放过渡空间中穿戴个人防护装备(PPE)进行核酸样本采集。穿戴 PPE 会给医护人员带来明显的心理和身体压力。在这项研究中,通过现场实验使用操作温度(T)和湿球黑球温度(WBGT)来评估热条件,同时测量受试者的多项生理参数。结果表明,受试者在穿戴和不穿戴 PPE 时,在热感觉和生理参数方面存在显著差异。通过观察心率(HR)、耳道温度(T)、平均皮肤温度(MST)和呼气末 CO 压力的增加,发现受试者在穿戴 PPE 时代谢率和热量储存增加。此外,还观察到氧气浓度降低,这可能与疲劳和认知障碍有关。此外,HR、MST 和 T 呈显著线性关系,随温度和操作温度升高而升高,且 HR 对 PPE 的响应比不穿戴 PPE 时更强。中性、舒适和可接受的温度在穿戴 PPE 时明显低于不穿戴 PPE,中性 T/WBGT 的偏差为 9.5/7.1°C,舒适 T/WBGT 的偏差为 2.2/4.0°C。此外,穿戴 PPE 时可接受的 WBGT 上限为 29.4°C,不穿戴 PPE 时为 20.4°C,两者差异显著。此外,记录的受试者穿戴 PPE 时的生理参数响应和热感觉响应表明他们存在热应激风险。总的来说,这些结果表明穿戴 PPE 的人应关注自身健康和热应激。本研究为制定对抗热应激和提高热舒适度的策略提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/5aebf2b9bcb3/gr17_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/7bb57d6f6efe/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/289967e80312/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/64d46ee89cb2/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/f0351e8eebe9/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/629760601aba/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/2608168f5ffe/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/95c9a067b3df/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/b8adcc29ddd5/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/3bde1c1347cc/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/7a73f8d7ff55/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/4f25bf854890/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/a83ed55d57c3/gr11_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/c88968d092d6/gr12_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/8c73d715b434/gr13_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/878c1635ccc9/gr14_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/fbf889793a88/gr15_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/168fd07fdb5f/gr16_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/5aebf2b9bcb3/gr17_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/7bb57d6f6efe/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/289967e80312/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/64d46ee89cb2/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/f0351e8eebe9/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/629760601aba/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/2608168f5ffe/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/95c9a067b3df/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/b8adcc29ddd5/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/3bde1c1347cc/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/7a73f8d7ff55/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/4f25bf854890/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/a83ed55d57c3/gr11_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/c88968d092d6/gr12_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/8c73d715b434/gr13_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/878c1635ccc9/gr14_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/fbf889793a88/gr15_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/168fd07fdb5f/gr16_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcb/10014506/5aebf2b9bcb3/gr17_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Human thermal physiological response of wearing personal protective equipment: An educational building semi-open space experimental investigation.人员穿着个人防护装备的热生理反应:一座教育建筑半开放空间的实验研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 15;877:162779. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162779. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Experimental investigation of the effects of personal protective equipment on thermal comfort in hot environments.个人防护装备对炎热环境下热舒适性影响的实验研究。
Build Environ. 2022 Aug 15;222:109352. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109352. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
3
Field investigation of the heat stress in outdoor of healthcare workers wearing personal protective equipment in South China.华南地区医护人员穿戴个人防护装备进行户外作业的热应激现场调查。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;11:1166056. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166056. eCollection 2023.
4
Thermophysiological and Perceptual Responses of Amateur Healthcare Workers: Impacts of Ambient Condition, Inner-Garment Insulation and Personal Cooling Strategy.业余医护人员的热生理和感知反应:环境条件、内衣隔热和个人冷却策略的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):612. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010612.
5
Effects of heat and personal protective equipment on thermal strain in healthcare workers: part B-application of wearable sensors to observe heat strain among healthcare workers under controlled conditions.医护人员热应激和个人防护装备的影响:B 部分-可穿戴传感器在控制条件下观察医护人员热应激中的应用。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 Jan;97(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-02022-2. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Effects of Heat Exposure and Ice Slurry Ingestion on Risk-Taking Behavior in Healthcare Workers.热暴露和冰浆摄入对医护人员冒险行为的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Oct 1;56(10):2016-2025. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003486. Epub 2024 May 15.
7
Heat Stress and Thermal Perception amongst Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in India and Singapore.印度和新加坡 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员的热应激和热感觉。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 3;17(21):8100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218100.
8
Moderate Thermal Strain in Healthcare Workers Wearing Personal Protective Equipment During Treatment and Care Activities in the Context of the 2014 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak.在 2014 年埃博拉病毒病疫情期间,医护人员在治疗和护理活动中穿戴个人防护装备时的中度热应激。
J Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;213(9):1462-5. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv585. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
9
The effect of personal protective equipment on thermal stress: An experimental study on firefighters.个人防护装备对热应激的影响:消防员的实验研究。
Work. 2020;67(1):141-147. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203259.
10
Comparison of Thermal Manikin Modeling and Human Subjects' Response During Use of Cooling Devices Under Personal Protective Ensembles in the Heat.热环境下个人防护装备中使用冷却装置时热人体模型建模与人体受试者反应的比较。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Jun;33(3):279-287. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000328. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Wearing Personal Protective Equipment on Serum Cortisol Levels and Physiological Variables in Healthcare Workers: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Simulated Pandemic Environment.佩戴个人防护装备对医护人员血清皮质醇水平及生理变量的影响:在模拟大流行环境中的一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2024 Jun 4;16(6):e61687. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61687. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
ETView SL versus Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation Amid Simulated COVID-19 Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Crossover Study.在模拟的 COVID-19 心脏骤停期间,ETView SL 喉镜与麦金塔直接喉镜用于气管插管的比较:一项随机交叉研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 2;12(15):5074. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155074.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of the Thermal Comfort Properties of Masks Used during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间口罩热舒适性能的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11275. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811275.
2
Projections of heatwave-attributable mortality under climate change and future population scenarios in China.气候变化和中国未来人口情景下热浪所致死亡率的预测
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Sep 5;28:100582. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100582. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Workers' Perception Heat Stress: Results from a Pilot Study Conducted in Italy during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020.
工人对热应激的感知:意大利在 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的一项试点研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 4;19(13):8196. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138196.
4
Experimental investigation of the effects of personal protective equipment on thermal comfort in hot environments.个人防护装备对炎热环境下热舒适性影响的实验研究。
Build Environ. 2022 Aug 15;222:109352. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109352. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
A potential wearable solution for preventing heat strain in workplaces: The cooling effect and the total evaporative resistance of a ventilation jacket.一种潜在的可穿戴式解决方案,用于预防工作场所的热应激:通风夹克的冷却效果和总蒸发阻力。
Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt D):113475. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113475. Epub 2022 May 16.
6
The effects of nurses' use of personal protective equipment on their vital signs during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间护士使用个人防护装备对其生命体征的影响。
Work. 2022;71(4):843-850. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211232.
7
Modified Stroop task performance when wearing protective clothing in the heat: An evaluation of the maximum adaptability model.炎热环境下穿着防护服时的改良斯特鲁普任务表现:最大适应性模型的评估
Physiol Behav. 2022 Mar 15;246:113690. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113690. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
8
Evaluation of headache associated with personal protective equipment during COVID-19.评估 COVID-19 期间与个人防护装备相关的头痛。
Brain Behav. 2021 Dec;11(12):e2435. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2435. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
9
Heat strain in chemical protective clothing in hot-humid environment: Effects of clothing thermal properties.湿热环境下化学防护服的热应激:服装热性能的影响
J Cent South Univ. 2021;28(12):3654-3665. doi: 10.1007/s11771-021-4670-5. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
10
Influence of study design on effects of mask wearing on fMRI BOLD contrast and systemic physiology - A comment on Law et al. (2021).研究设计对口罩佩戴对 fMRI BOLD 对比和全身生理学影响的影响——对 Law 等人(2021 年)的评论。
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 1;244:118549. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118549. Epub 2021 Sep 8.