Interdepartmental Center for Research Ethics and Integrity, National Research Council, Rome, Italy; Faculty of Medicine & Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Interdepartmental Center for Research Ethics and Integrity, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Vaccine. 2023 Apr 6;41(15):2582-2588. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.081. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
The aim of the study is to understand the evolution of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance over the key 7-month vaccine campaign in Italy, a period in which the country moved from candidate vaccines to products administered to the public. The research focus points to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine attitudes in adults and their children, propension towards compulsory vaccination, past and present adherence to anti-flu and anti-pneumococcal vaccines, and the reasons for trust/mistrust of vaccines.
Italian residents aged 16->65 years were invited to complete an online survey from September 2020 to April 2021. The survey contained 13 questions: 3 on demographic data; 8 on vaccine attitudes; and 2 open-ended questions about the reasons of vaccine confidence/refusal. A preliminary word frequency analysis has been conducted, as well as a statistical bivariate analysis.
Of 21.537 participants, the confidence of those in favor of the COVID-19 vaccine increases of 50 % and the number of people who wanted more information decreases by two-third. Willingness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 also increased from 51 % to 66.5 %. Only one-third of the strong vaccine-hesitant participants, i.e. 10 %, remained hostile. Compulsory vaccination showed a large and increasing favor by participants up to 78 %, in a way similar to their propensity for children's mandatory vaccination (70.6 %). Respondents' past and present adherence to anti-flu and anti-pneumococcal vaccines does not predict their intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19. Finally, a semantic analysis of the reasons of acceptance/refusal of COVID-19 vaccination suggests a complex decision-making process revealed by the participants' use of common words in pro-and-cons arguments.
The heterogeneity in the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, determinants and opinions detected at different ages, genders and pandemic phases suggests that health authorities should avoid one-size-fits-all vaccination campaigns. The results emphasize the long-term importance of reinforcing vaccine information, communication and education needs.
本研究旨在了解意大利长达 7 个月的疫苗接种运动期间,民众对 COVID-19 疫苗接受程度的变化。在此期间,意大利从候选疫苗转变为向公众提供产品。本研究的重点是评估成年人及其子女对 COVID-19 疫苗的态度、对强制接种的倾向、对流感和肺炎球菌疫苗的既往和当前依从性,以及对疫苗信任/不信任的原因。
从 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月,邀请意大利 16-65 岁的居民完成在线调查。调查包含 13 个问题:3 个关于人口统计学数据;8 个关于疫苗态度;2 个关于对疫苗有信心/拒绝接种的原因的开放式问题。已经进行了初步的词频分析以及统计的双变量分析。
在 21537 名参与者中,支持 COVID-19 疫苗的人数增加了 50%,希望获得更多信息的人数减少了三分之二。愿意为孩子接种 COVID-19 疫苗的比例也从 51%增加到了 66.5%。只有三分之一的强烈疫苗犹豫者(即 10%)仍然持反对意见。强制接种的支持率很高且呈上升趋势,参与者中有 78%表示支持,这与他们对儿童强制接种的倾向(70.6%)相似。受访者对流感和肺炎球菌疫苗的既往和当前依从性并不能预测他们对 COVID-19 疫苗的接种意愿。最后,对 COVID-19 疫苗接种接受/拒绝原因的语义分析表明,参与者在正反两方面的论点中使用常见词汇,反映了一个复杂的决策过程。
在不同年龄、性别和大流行阶段检测到的 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的异质性、决定因素和意见表明,卫生当局应避免一刀切的疫苗接种运动。研究结果强调了加强疫苗信息、沟通和教育需求的长期重要性。