Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间公众对医疗保健资源分配优先原则的态度。

Public Attitudes Toward Priority Setting Principles in Health Care During COVID-19.

作者信息

Tinghög Gustav, Strand Liam

机构信息

Swedish National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2022 May 13;2:886508. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.886508. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

What role should cost-effectiveness play in health care priority setting? We assess the level of acceptance toward different priority setting principles in health care during COVID-19 and in general, thereby exploring public support for principles presented at different levels of abstraction. An online survey was distributed to a diverse sample of the Swedish population ( = 1 553). The results show that respondents were generally more supportive of priority setting principles when expressed in general abstract terms than when expressed in more case specific concrete terms. However, prioritization based on cost-effectiveness was deemed as more acceptable when expressed in concrete terms related to health maximization rather than as an abstract principle. Respondents had a general inclination in support of physicians and other health care professionals the primary responsibility for the allocation of scarce resources in the healthcare during COVID-19, while being less supportive of health economists and politicians being involved in these decisions.

摘要

成本效益在医疗保健资源分配优先级设定中应发挥什么作用?我们评估了在新冠疫情期间及一般情况下,人们对医疗保健中不同资源分配优先级设定原则的接受程度,从而探究公众对不同抽象层次原则的支持情况。我们向瑞典不同人群发放了一份在线调查问卷(n = 1553)。结果显示,与以更具体的案例形式表述相比,当以一般抽象的术语表述时,受访者通常更支持资源分配优先级设定原则。然而,当以与健康最大化相关的具体术语表述时,基于成本效益的优先级设定比作为一项抽象原则时被认为更可接受。在新冠疫情期间,受访者普遍倾向于支持医生和其他医疗保健专业人员对医疗保健中稀缺资源分配承担主要责任,而不太支持卫生经济学家和政治家参与这些决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验