• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加强初级卫生保健财务管理系统:坦桑尼亚医疗机构财务会计与报告系统(FFARS)的绩效评估

Strengthening financial management systems at primary health care: Performance assessment of the Facility Financial Accounting and Reporting System (FFARS) in Tanzania.

作者信息

Ruhago George M, Ngalesoni Frida N, Kapologwe Ntuli A, Kengia James T, Ngocho James, Kabusi Stephen M, Kalolo Albino, Kitali Erick J, Rwamiago Elisa, Mtei Gemini

机构信息

Department of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.

Amref Health Africa, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2023 Jan 9;2:787940. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.787940. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/frhs.2022.787940
PMID:36925885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10012670/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Universal coverage remains a challenging pursuit around the world, even among the highest-income countries. Strengthening financial management capacity is essential towards attaining the three universal health coverage (UHC) goals, namely, expanded coverage, quality service, and financial protection. In this regard, Tanzania introduced the Facility Financial Accounting and Reporting System (FFARS) in line with the introduction of the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF) initiative in primary health care (PHC) in 2017-2018. We aim to assess the functionality of the FFARS in management, accounting, and reporting funds received and disbursed in the stride forward strengthening public financial management in PHC facilities towards UHC.

METHODS

The study applied implementation research using a concurrent convergent mixed-methods design to assess sources of revenue, expenditure priorities, and changes of revenues and to explore the usability and benefits of FFARS in improving facility finance and reporting systems in more than 5,000 PHC facilities in Tanzania. Quantitative methods assessed the changes in revenues and expenditure between the financial years (FYs) 2017-2018 and 2018-2019, while the qualitative part explored the usability and the benefits FFARS offers in improving facility finances and reporting systems. Data analysis involved a thematic and descriptive analysis for qualitative and quantitative data, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 5,473 PHC facilities, 88% were in rural areas; however, the annual average revenue was higher in urban facilities in FYs 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. Overall, district hospitals showed an increase whereas health centers reported a decline of more than 40% in revenue. The user fee was the predominant source of revenue, particularly in urban facilities, while revenue from health insurance was not among the top three highest sources of revenue. Expenditure priorities leaned more towards drugs and supplies (25%) followed by allowances and training (21%); these did not differ by facility geographies. In health centers, expenditure on facility infrastructure was predominant. Key Informant Interviews revealed an overall satisfaction and positive experiences related to the system.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of FFARS in Tanzania demonstrated its high potential in improving facility financial management, including its ability to track revenue and expenditure at PHC facilities. Staffing shortages, ICT infrastructure, and limited opportunities for capacity building could be the limiting factors to reaching the potential of the implementation of FFARS and the attainment of its full impact on Tanzania's pursuit for UHC.

摘要

背景

全球普及医疗覆盖仍是一项具有挑战性的工作,即使在高收入国家也是如此。加强财务管理能力对于实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)的三个目标至关重要,这三个目标分别是扩大覆盖范围、提高服务质量和提供财务保护。在这方面,坦桑尼亚于2017 - 2018年在初级卫生保健(PHC)中引入直接卫生机构融资(DHFF)倡议的同时,引入了机构财务会计和报告系统(FFARS)。我们旨在评估FFARS在管理、会计以及报告初级卫生保健机构为实现全民健康覆盖而在加强公共财务管理进程中所接收和支出资金方面的功能。

方法

本研究采用实施研究,运用同步收敛混合方法设计,以评估收入来源、支出重点以及收入变化情况,并探讨FFARS在改善坦桑尼亚5000多家初级卫生保健机构的机构财务和报告系统方面的可用性和益处。定量方法评估了2017 - 2018财年和2018 - 2019财年收入和支出的变化,而定性部分则探讨了FFARS在改善机构财务和报告系统方面的可用性和益处。数据分析分别对定性和定量数据进行了主题分析和描述性分析。

结果

在5473家初级卫生保健机构中,88%位于农村地区;然而,在2017 - 2018财年和2018 - 2019财年,城市机构的年平均收入更高。总体而言,地区医院收入有所增加,而卫生中心报告收入下降超过40%。使用者付费是主要收入来源,特别是在城市机构,而医疗保险收入并非三大最高收入来源之一。支出重点更多地倾向于药品和用品(25%),其次是津贴和培训(21%);这些在不同地理位置的机构之间没有差异。在卫生中心,机构基础设施支出占主导。关键信息人访谈显示对该系统总体满意且有积极体验。

结论

FFARS在坦桑尼亚的实施显示出其在改善机构财务管理方面的巨大潜力,包括其追踪初级卫生保健机构收入和支出的能力。人员短缺、信息通信技术基础设施以及能力建设机会有限可能是限制FFARS实现其实施潜力以及对坦桑尼亚追求全民健康覆盖产生全面影响的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d7/10012670/a7f6910f412e/frhs-02-787940-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d7/10012670/a5ac861856fb/frhs-02-787940-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d7/10012670/a7f6910f412e/frhs-02-787940-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d7/10012670/a5ac861856fb/frhs-02-787940-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d7/10012670/a7f6910f412e/frhs-02-787940-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Strengthening financial management systems at primary health care: Performance assessment of the Facility Financial Accounting and Reporting System (FFARS) in Tanzania.加强初级卫生保健财务管理系统:坦桑尼亚医疗机构财务会计与报告系统(FFARS)的绩效评估
Front Health Serv. 2023 Jan 9;2:787940. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.787940. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessment of strategic healthcare purchasing and financial autonomy in Tanzania: the case of results-based financing and health basket fund.坦桑尼亚战略性医疗采购和财务自主权评估:以基于成果的融资和医疗篮子基金为例。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 12;11:1260236. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1260236. eCollection 2023.
3
Understanding the implication of direct health facility financing on health commodities availability in Tanzania.了解坦桑尼亚直接的医疗机构融资对卫生用品供应情况的影响。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 8;3(5):e0001867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001867. eCollection 2023.
4
Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol.了解坦桑尼亚直接卫生机构融资的实施情况及其对卫生系统绩效的影响:一项非对照前后混合方法研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 30;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3.
5
The fall and rise of cost sharing in Kenya: the impact of phased implementation.肯尼亚成本分担政策的起伏:分阶段实施的影响
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Mar;11(1):52-63. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.1.52.
6
Evaluation of the Direct Health Facility Financing Program in Improving Maternal Health Services in Pangani District, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚潘加尼区直接卫生机构融资计划对改善孕产妇保健服务的评估。
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Dec 9;13:1227-1242. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S333900. eCollection 2021.
7
Implementation of patient charges at primary care facilities in Kenya: implications of low adherence to user fee policy for users and facility revenue.肯尼亚基层医疗设施患者收费的实施情况:对用户和机构收入而言,低依从性使用者付费政策的影响
Health Policy Plan. 2015 May;30(4):508-17. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu026. Epub 2014 May 16.
8
Implementation of direct health facility financing in the rural District of Kigoma in Western Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西部基戈马地区农村直接卫生机构筹资的实施。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Sep 14;46:19. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.19.41052. eCollection 2023.
9
Bank accounts for public primary health care facilities: Reflections on implementation from three districts in Tanzania.公立初级卫生保健机构的银行账户:对坦桑尼亚三个地区实施情况的思考
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):e860-e874. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2702. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
Universal Health Coverage and Essential Packages of Care全民健康覆盖与基本医疗服务包

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare managers' perspectives on direct health facility financing in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚医疗保健管理人员对医疗机构直接融资的看法。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 28;5(5):e0003772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003772. eCollection 2025.
2
Contribution of health system governance in delivering primary health care services for universal health coverage: A scoping review.卫生系统治理在提供初级卫生保健服务以实现全民健康覆盖方面的贡献:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0318244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318244. eCollection 2025.
3
Reducing fragmentation of primary healthcare financing for more equitable, people-centred primary healthcare.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Efficiency Analysis of the Improved Web-Based Planning, Budgeting, and Reporting System (PlanRep) in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚改进的基于网络的规划、预算编制和报告系统(PlanRep)的成本效益分析
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jan 18;1:787894. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2021.787894. eCollection 2021.
2
Health insurance and health system (un) responsiveness: a qualitative study with elderly in rural Tanzania.健康保险与卫生系统(不)响应性:坦桑尼亚农村老年人的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 22;21(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07144-2.
3
How do decision-makers use evidence in community health policy and financing decisions? A qualitative study and conceptual framework in four African countries.
减少初级医疗保健融资的碎片化,以实现更公平、以人为本的初级医疗保健。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jan 14;10(1):e015088. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015088.
4
Evaluating the implementation of the National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA) gateway for the Basic Healthcare Provision Fund (BHCPF) across six Northern states in Nigeria.评价尼日利亚北部六个州基本医疗保障基金国家初级卫生保健发展署(NPHCDA)网关的实施情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11867-3.
5
Assessment of strategic healthcare purchasing and financial autonomy in Tanzania: the case of results-based financing and health basket fund.坦桑尼亚战略性医疗采购和财务自主权评估:以基于成果的融资和医疗篮子基金为例。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 12;11:1260236. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1260236. eCollection 2023.
6
Understanding the implication of direct health facility financing on health commodities availability in Tanzania.了解坦桑尼亚直接的医疗机构融资对卫生用品供应情况的影响。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 8;3(5):e0001867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001867. eCollection 2023.
决策者如何在社区卫生政策和融资决策中使用证据?四个非洲国家的定性研究和概念框架。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Aug 1;35(7):799-809. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa027.
4
Development and upgrading of public primary healthcare facilities with essential surgical services infrastructure: a strategy towards achieving universal health coverage in Tanzania.发展和升级提供基本外科服务的公立初级保健设施:坦桑尼亚实现全民健康覆盖的战略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5057-2.
5
Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol.了解坦桑尼亚直接卫生机构融资的实施情况及其对卫生系统绩效的影响:一项非对照前后混合方法研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 30;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3.
6
Understanding variations in health insurance coverage in Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania: Evidence from demographic and health surveys.理解加纳、肯尼亚、尼日利亚和坦桑尼亚的医疗保险覆盖范围的差异:来自人口与健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 6;13(8):e0201833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201833. eCollection 2018.
7
How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design.如何构建混合方法研究设计。
Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2017;69(Suppl 2):107-131. doi: 10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1980 - 2015年全球、区域和国家249种死因的预期寿命、全死因死亡率和死因别死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1459-1544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1.
9
Integration of healthcare and financial information: Evaluation in a public hospital using a comprehensive approach.医疗保健与财务信息整合:采用综合方法在一家公立医院进行的评估
Health Informatics J. 2016 Dec;22(4):878-896. doi: 10.1177/1460458215595259. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
10
Effect of development assistance on domestic health expenditures.发展援助对国内卫生支出的影响。
Lancet. 2010 Aug 21;376(9741):590-1; author reply 592-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61291-3.