Love Penelope, Laws Rachel, Taki Sarah, West Madeline, Hesketh Kylie D, Campbell Karen J
Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences (SENS), Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Front Health Serv. 2022 Nov 25;2:1031628. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1031628. eCollection 2022.
The is an efficacious, group-based program for first-time parents, delivered at three-monthly intervals when are aged 3-18 months through an existing universal care service in Victoria, Australia. Many lessons have been learnt from its origins as a cluster randomized control trial to its small-scale, community-level implementation. This study aimed to describe factors contributing to its sustained implementation to inform large-scale implementation across Australia.
This study used a multi-site qualitative exploratory approach. facilitators trained between 2013 and 2017 were sent an online survey, with optional telephone interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was selected as the underpinning theoretical framework as it offered the opportunity to explore a breadth of possible barriers and enablers across patterns of implementation (never, discontinued, ongoing).
All participants were female ( = 31), the majority were Maternal and Child Health Nurses (48%), representing five regional and nine metro local government areas (LGAs), across all patterns of implementation (never implemented = 4; discontinued implementation = 5; ongoing implementation = 5). All consenting participants were interviewed ( = 11) representing four regional and seven metro LGAs, across all patterns of implementation (never implemented = 3; discontinued implementation = 4; ongoing implementation = 4). The main reason for attending training was to become skilled to implement the program. Mapping identified barriers and enablers to the CFIR revealed the inner and outer settings and implementation process to be of greatest influence. Main differences between LGAs with ongoing and discontinued implementation related to funding availability, organizational management support and endorsement, organizational resourcing and capacity, integration into routine practice and establishing role clarity with partner organizations, and planning for sustained implementation from the start.
This study provides important insights into the barriers and enablers to the sustained implementation of an evidence-based intervention (the ) during small scale community-level implementation. The authors therefore contend that the pre-requisite for scale-up of a population health intervention is not just proof of effectiveness but also proof of sustained implementation at the local/organizational level. Study findings have broad transferability given their similarity to those identified for health promotion interventions implemented globally, in healthcare, education and community settings.
[项目名称]是一项针对初为父母者的有效且基于群体的项目,通过澳大利亚维多利亚州现有的全民护理服务,在孩子3至18个月大时每三个月开展一次。从其作为整群随机对照试验的起源到小规模社区层面的实施,已经吸取了许多经验教训。本研究旨在描述促成其持续实施的因素,以为在澳大利亚的大规模实施提供参考。
本研究采用多地点定性探索性方法。向2013年至2017年期间接受培训的[项目名称]促进者发送了在线调查问卷,并提供了可选的电话访谈。选择实施研究综合框架(CFIR)作为基础理论框架,因为它提供了一个机会,可在不同实施模式(从未实施、已停止、正在进行)中探索广泛的可能障碍和促进因素。
所有参与者均为女性(n = 31),大多数是母婴健康护士(48%),代表五个地区和九个城市地方政府区域(LGA),涵盖所有实施模式(从未实施 = 4;已停止实施 = 5;正在进行实施 = 5)。所有同意参与的参与者都接受了访谈(n = 11),代表四个地区和七个城市LGA,涵盖所有实施模式(从未实施 = 3;已停止实施 = 4;正在进行实施 = 4)。参加[项目名称]培训 的主要原因是为了熟练掌握实施该项目的技能。对照CFIR对障碍和促进因素进行映射分析发现,内部和外部环境以及实施过程影响最大。正在进行实施和已停止实施的LGA之间的主要差异与资金可用性、组织管理支持与认可、组织资源与能力、融入常规实践以及与合作伙伴组织明确角色,以及从一开始就规划持续实施有关。
本研究为基于证据的干预措施([项目名称])在小规模社区层面实施过程中的持续实施障碍和促进因素提供了重要见解。因此,作者认为扩大人群健康干预措施的前提条件不仅是有效性的证明,还包括在地方/组织层面持续实施的证明。鉴于研究结果与全球在医疗保健、教育和社区环境中实施的健康促进干预措施所确定的结果相似,具有广泛的可转移性。