Zetterlund Johanna, von Thiele Schwarz Ulrica, Hasson Henna, Neher Margit
Department of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jun 13;2:883072. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.883072. eCollection 2022.
Adaptations are often necessary to effectively translate evidence-based interventions (EBI) between contexts, but compliance with the EBIs' core components is still important, which is referred to as the fidelity-adaptation dilemma. In the sustainment phase of implementation, it is the professionals delivering the EBIs who are tasked with the decision-making regarding adaptations, but the currently used models and frameworks mostly focus on the initial phases of implementation. To better understand and guide professionals in using EBIs, there is a need to explore professionals' perceptions of the fidelity-adaptation dilemma. The aim of this study is consequently to explore how professionals perceive and navigate the fidelity-adaptation dilemma when using an EBI out of context.
Semi-structured interviews were held with 19 psychologists working in primary care. The interviews concerned EBIs in general and Cool Kids, an evidence-based parenting education program designed for children with anxiety that is now used for children with lower levels of anxiety in another setting. The data were analyzed using an inductive content analysis method.
The analysis resulted in two themes: and . The first theme summarizes the professionals' perceptions of confidence for either favoring fidelity or adaptations, as well as reasons for why they made adaptations. For the second theme, the professionals expressed concern about sometimes meeting difficulties with the dilemma when following their original inclination and having second thoughts about the impact the adaptations have in practice.
The professionals generally had strong preferences regarding fidelity and adaptations, but neither preference prevented them from facing difficulties with the dilemma. The results point to a need for better information about possible adaptations from developers but also better support and guidance for professionals when implementing EBIs to ensure quality implementation and facilitate implementation. The results of this study can inform the design of support for professionals in managing the dilemma.
为了在不同情境之间有效地转化循证干预措施(EBI),调整往往是必要的,但遵守循证干预措施的核心组成部分仍然很重要,这就是所谓的保真度 - 调整困境。在实施的维持阶段,负责实施循证干预措施的专业人员负责做出关于调整的决策,但目前使用的模型和框架大多关注实施的初始阶段。为了更好地理解并指导专业人员使用循证干预措施,有必要探讨专业人员对保真度 - 调整困境的看法。因此,本研究的目的是探讨专业人员在脱离背景使用循证干预措施时如何看待和应对保真度 - 调整困境。
对19名在基层医疗工作的心理学家进行了半结构化访谈。访谈内容涉及一般的循证干预措施以及“酷小孩”项目,这是一个为焦虑儿童设计的循证育儿教育项目,现在在另一个环境中用于焦虑程度较低的儿童。使用归纳性内容分析法对数据进行了分析。
分析得出两个主题:[此处原文缺失两个主题的具体内容]。第一个主题总结了专业人员对支持保真度或调整的信心看法,以及他们进行调整的原因。对于第二个主题,专业人员表示担心有时按照自己的初衷行事时会在困境中遇到困难,并对调整在实践中的影响产生疑虑。
专业人员通常对保真度和调整有强烈的偏好,但两种偏好都未能使他们避免在困境中面临困难。结果表明,需要开发者提供关于可能调整的更好信息,同时在实施循证干预措施时需要为专业人员提供更好的支持和指导,以确保高质量实施并促进实施。本研究结果可为支持专业人员应对这一困境的设计提供参考。