Suppr超能文献

氨苄西林加舒巴坦对厌氧菌的体外活性与氨苄西林和头孢西丁的比较。

In vitro activity of ampicillin plus sulbactam against anaerobes compared to ampicillin and cefoxitin.

作者信息

Heizmann W, Heilmann F, Werner H

机构信息

Abteilung für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Hygiene-Institut der Universität, Tübingen.

出版信息

Infection. 1987;15(5):370-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01647747.

Abstract

The antimicrobial susceptibility of 195 recent clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria was studied to ampicillin alone, ampicillin + 1 mg/l sulbactam, ampicillin + 5 mg/l sulbactam, and cefoxitin by means of agar dilution tests. The ampicillin-sulbactam combinations were the most effective drugs against species of the Bacteroides fragilis group, the MIC90 of ampicillin + 5 mg/l sulbactam for B. fragilis being less than 1 mg/l, compared to 256 mg/l of ampicillin, 4 mg/l of ampicillin + 1 mg/l sulbactam, and 8 mg/l of cefoxitin. No significant difference between ampicillin alone and in combination with sulbactam was observed against gram-positive anaerobic rods, Peptococcus spp. and Peptostreptococcus spp. with MIC's less than 2 mg/l.

摘要

采用琼脂稀释法,对195株近期临床分离的厌氧菌进行了单独氨苄西林、氨苄西林+1mg/L舒巴坦、氨苄西林+5mg/L舒巴坦及头孢西丁的药敏试验。氨苄西林-舒巴坦联合制剂是针对脆弱拟杆菌群最有效的药物,氨苄西林+5mg/L舒巴坦对脆弱拟杆菌的MIC90小于1mg/L,相比之下,氨苄西林的MIC90为256mg/L,氨苄西林+1mg/L舒巴坦为4mg/L,头孢西丁为8mg/L。对于MIC小于2mg/L的革兰氏阳性厌氧杆菌、消化球菌属和消化链球菌属,未观察到单独氨苄西林与氨苄西林-舒巴坦联合制剂之间存在显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验