Sveum Jacob W, Mishra Raveena R, Marti Taylor L, Jones Jalon M, Hellenbrand Daniel J, Hanna Amgad S
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health (UWSMPH), Madison, WI, USA.
Neural Regen Res. 2023 Sep;18(9):1917-1924. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.367839.
Medical research on neurologic ailments requires representative animal models to validate treatments before they are translated to human clinical trials. Rodents are the predominant animal model used in neurological research despite limited anatomic and physiologic similarities to humans. As a result, functional testing designed to assess locomotor recovery after neurologic impairment is well established in rodent models. Comparatively, larger, more clinically relevant models have not been as well studied. To achieve similar locomotor testing standardization in larger animals, the models must be accessible to a wide array of researchers. Non-human primates are the most relevant animal model for translational research, however ethical and financial barriers limit their accessibility. This review focuses on swine, sheep, and goats as large animal alternatives for transitional studies between rodents and non-human primates. The objective of this review is to compare motor testing and data collection methods used in swine, sheep, and goats to encourage testing standardization in these larger animal models. The PubMed database was analyzed by searching combinations of swine, sheep, and goats, neurologic injuries, and functional assessments. Findings were categorized by animal model, data collection method, and assessment design. Swine and sheep were used in the majority of the studies, while only two studies were found using goats. The functional assessments included open pen analysis, treadmill walking, and guided free walking. Data collection methods included subjective behavioral rating scales and objective tools such as pressure-sensitive mats and image-based analysis software. Overall, swine and sheep were well-suited for a variety of assessment designs, with treadmill walking and guided free walking offering the most consistency across multiple trials. Data collection methods varied, but image-based gait analysis software provided the most robust analysis. Future studies should be conducted to standardize functional testing methods after neurologic impairment in large animals.
关于神经疾病的医学研究需要具有代表性的动物模型,以便在将治疗方法应用于人体临床试验之前进行验证。尽管与人类的解剖学和生理学相似性有限,但啮齿动物仍是神经学研究中使用的主要动物模型。因此,旨在评估神经损伤后运动恢复的功能测试在啮齿动物模型中已经很成熟。相比之下,更大、更具临床相关性的模型尚未得到充分研究。为了在大型动物中实现类似的运动测试标准化,这些模型必须为广大研究人员所使用。非人灵长类动物是转化研究中最相关的动物模型,然而伦理和经济障碍限制了它们的可用性。本综述重点关注猪、绵羊和山羊,将其作为啮齿动物和非人灵长类动物之间过渡研究的大型动物替代模型。本综述的目的是比较猪、绵羊和山羊中使用的运动测试和数据收集方法,以促进这些大型动物模型测试的标准化。通过搜索猪、绵羊和山羊、神经损伤和功能评估的组合来分析PubMed数据库。研究结果按动物模型、数据收集方法和评估设计进行分类。大多数研究使用了猪和绵羊,而仅发现两项研究使用了山羊。功能评估包括开放式围栏分析、跑步机行走和引导自由行走。数据收集方法包括主观行为评分量表和客观工具,如压力感应垫和基于图像的分析软件。总体而言,猪和绵羊适用于各种评估设计,跑步机行走和引导自由行走在多次试验中提供了最大的一致性。数据收集方法各不相同,但基于图像的步态分析软件提供了最可靠的分析。未来应开展研究,以规范大型动物神经损伤后的功能测试方法。