• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species.通过对《动物福利法》监管物种进行推断来估算美国实验室中小鼠和大鼠的使用量。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79961-0.
2
Does the Animal Welfare Act apply to free-ranging animals?《动物福利法》适用于自由放养的动物吗?
ILAR J. 2003;44(4):252-8. doi: 10.1093/ilar.44.4.252.
3
Rats, mice, and birds and the Animal Welfare Act.大鼠、小鼠、鸟类与《动物福利法》。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001 Mar;11(1):113. doi: 10.1353/ken.2001.0004.
4
Legal bid could extend US animal welfare law to cover lab rodents.法律提案可能会将美国动物福利法的覆盖范围扩大至实验用啮齿动物。
Nature. 1999 Jul 15;400(6741):197-8. doi: 10.1038/22160.
5
Behavioral Management Programs to Promote Laboratory Animal Welfare促进实验动物福利的行为管理计划
6
What price mice?老鼠值多少钱?
JAMA. 2001 Feb 21;285(7):939-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.7.939.
7
Knowledge of the animal welfare act and animal welfare regulations influences attitudes toward animal research.对《动物福利法》和动物福利法规的了解会影响对动物研究的态度。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015 Jan;54(1):70-5.
8
Court says lab rats deserve special care.法院称实验用大鼠应得到特殊照料。
N Y Times Web. 2000 Oct 7:A16.
9
House backs year's delay in extra care for lab rats.豪斯支持将对实验鼠的额外照料推迟一年。
N Y Times Web. 2000 Oct 12:A16.
10
Animal research. Court favours mice, rats, birds.动物研究。法庭偏袒小鼠、大鼠、鸟类。
Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):191. doi: 10.1038/355191b0.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-Time, Continuous Monitoring of Tissue Chips as an Emerging Opportunity for Biosensing.组织芯片的实时连续监测——生物传感的新机遇
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 19;25(16):5153. doi: 10.3390/s25165153.
2
A call to action to address critical flaws and bias in laboratory animal experiments and preclinical research.呼吁采取行动解决实验动物实验和临床前研究中的关键缺陷和偏差。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 21;15(1):30745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15935-4.
3
Incorporating farm animal models for the study of neuropsychiatric diseases: Expansion of the possibilities.纳入农场动物模型用于神经精神疾病研究:可能性的拓展。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01332-x.
4
Assessment of quality of life and wellbeing in mouse preclinical research - A scoping review.小鼠临床前研究中生活质量和幸福感的评估——一项范围综述
Neurosci Appl. 2024 Mar 19;3:104058. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104058. eCollection 2024.
5
Establishment of Cre/LoxP-mediated multifunctional reporter knock-in rats with the CRISPR system.利用CRISPR系统建立Cre/LoxP介导的多功能报告基因敲入大鼠。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0325444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325444. eCollection 2025.
6
High-temporal-resolution point-of-care multiplex biomarker monitoring in small animals using microfluidic digital ELISA.使用微流控数字酶联免疫吸附测定法对小动物进行高时间分辨率即时多重生物标志物监测。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 15:2025.05.11.653356. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.11.653356.
7
Improving bench-to-bedside translation for acute graft-versus-host disease models.改善急性移植物抗宿主病模型从实验台到临床的转化。
Dis Model Mech. 2025 Feb 1;18(2). doi: 10.1242/dmm.052084. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
8
Molecular identification and subtyping of Cryptosporidium spp. in laboratory mice and rats.实验小鼠和大鼠中隐孢子虫属的分子鉴定与亚型分析。
Parasite. 2024;31:75. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2024073. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
9
Development of a gold nanoparticle-based novel diagnostic prototype for detection of Indian red scorpion () venom.基于金纳米颗粒的新型诊断原型用于检测印度红蝎毒液的研发。
Toxicon X. 2024 Aug 18;23:100203. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2024.100203. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Investigating the Effect of Enterally Administered Capromorelin on Body Weight in Mice (Mus musculus).研究肠内给予卡泊瑞林对小鼠(Mus musculus)体重的影响。
Comp Med. 2024 Oct 31;74(5):327-335. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-24-031. Print 2024 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
An Estimate of the Number of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes Worldwide in 2015.2015 年全球用于科学目的的动物数量估计。
Altern Lab Anim. 2019 Nov-Dec;47(5-6):196-213. doi: 10.1177/0261192919899853.
2
Ethical and IACUC Considerations Regarding Analgesia and Pain Management in Laboratory Rodents.关于实验啮齿动物镇痛与疼痛管理的伦理及机构动物护理与使用委员会考量
Comp Med. 2019 Dec 1;69(6):443-450. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-18-000149. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Trends in animal use at US research facilities.美国研究机构动物使用情况的趋势。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Jul;41(7):567-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102404. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
4
Estimates for worldwide laboratory animal use in 2005.2005年全球实验动物使用量的估计。
Altern Lab Anim. 2008 Jul;36(3):327-42. doi: 10.1177/026119290803600310.
5
The injustice of excluding laboratory rats, mice, and birds from the Animal Welfare Act.将实验大鼠、小鼠和鸟类排除在《动物福利法》之外的不公现象。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2000 Sep;10(3):229-38. doi: 10.1353/ken.2000.0021.

通过对《动物福利法》监管物种进行推断来估算美国实验室中小鼠和大鼠的使用量。

Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species.

作者信息

Carbone Larry

机构信息

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79961-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-79961-0
PMID:33436799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7803966/
Abstract

Alone among Western nations, the United States has a two-tier system for welfare protections for vertebrate animals in research. Because its Animal Welfare Act (AWA) excludes laboratory rats and mice (RM), government veterinarians do not inspect RM laboratories and RM numbers are only partially reported to government agencies. Without transparent statistics, it is impossible to track efforts to reduce or replace these sentient animals' use or to project government resources needed if AWA coverage were expanded to include them. I obtained annual RM usage data from 16 large American institutions and compared RM numbers to institutions' legally-required reports of their AWA-covered mammals. RM comprised approximately 99.3% of mammals at these representative institutions. Extrapolating from 780,070 AWA-covered mammals in 2017-18, I estimate that 111.5 million rats and mice were used per year in this period. If the same proportion of RM undergo painful procedures as are publicly reported for AWA-covered animals, then some 44.5 million mice and rats underwent potentially painful experiments. These data inform the questions of whether the AWA needs an update to cover RM, or whether the NIH should increase transparency of funded animal research. These figures can benchmark progress in reducing animal numbers in general and more specifically, in painful experiments. This estimate is higher than any others available, reflecting the challenges of obtaining statistics without consistent and transparent institutional reports.

摘要

在西方国家中,美国独具特色地拥有一套针对实验中脊椎动物的两级福利保护体系。由于其《动物福利法》(AWA)将实验用大鼠和小鼠排除在外,政府兽医不会对大鼠和小鼠实验室进行检查,且大鼠和小鼠的数量仅部分上报给政府机构。没有透明的统计数据,就无法追踪减少或替代这些有感知能力动物使用的努力,也无法预测如果将AWA的覆盖范围扩大到包括它们在内所需的政府资源。我从16家美国大型机构获取了年度大鼠和小鼠使用数据,并将大鼠和小鼠的数量与这些机构依法要求上报的受AWA覆盖的哺乳动物数量进行了比较。在这些具有代表性的机构中,大鼠和小鼠约占哺乳动物总数的99.3%。根据2017 - 2018年780,070只受AWA覆盖的哺乳动物数量进行推断,我估计在此期间每年使用1.115亿只大鼠和小鼠。如果接受痛苦实验程序的大鼠和小鼠比例与公开报道的受AWA覆盖动物的比例相同,那么约有4450万只小鼠和大鼠接受了可能带来痛苦的实验。这些数据引发了关于AWA是否需要更新以涵盖大鼠和小鼠,或者国立卫生研究院(NIH)是否应提高其资助的动物研究透明度的问题。这些数字可以作为总体上减少动物数量,特别是减少痛苦实验中动物数量进展的基准。这一估计高于其他任何可得数据,反映了在缺乏一致且透明的机构报告的情况下获取统计数据的挑战。