School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jan;25(1):560-576. doi: 10.1177/15248380231156408. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
This systematic review is the first to synthesize knowledge of parental involvement in child sexual abuse (CSA) prevention programs. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, 24 intervention evaluations met the inclusion criteria of aiming to change parental knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, behavioral intentions, self-efficacy, response-efficacy, or capabilities for prevention of CSA. Included papers were identified via a combination of electronic database searches (PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, google.com.au, open.grey.eu, Global ETD, Open Access Theses & Dissertations, EThOS, and Trove) and direct communication with researchers. Improvement post intervention was found most commonly for parental behavioral intentions and response-efficacy, closely followed by parental behaviors, then capabilities, self-efficacy, knowledge, and lastly, parental attitudes. Improvements in behaviors, intentions, and response-efficacy occurred in 88 to 100% of the studies in which they were addressed, improvements in self-efficacy and capabilities occurred in 67 to 75%, and improvements in knowledge and attitudes occurred in only 50 to 56%. Many of the included evaluation studies suffered from methodological and reporting flaws, such as high participant attrition, lack of control group, lack of statistical tests, missed testing time points, and a lack of (or short) follow-up. Future parent-focused CSA prevention evaluations must address these concerns by conducting rigorous empirical research with sound methodologies and comprehensive reporting. Furthermore, study designs should consider measuring the real-world impact of increases in assessed parent variables, including their ability to prevent sexual victimization of children.
这是系统综述首次综合了父母参与儿童性虐待(CSA)预防计划的知识。本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准,24 项干预评估符合纳入标准,旨在改变父母的知识、态度、行为、行为意向、自我效能感、反应效能或预防 CSA 的能力。纳入的论文是通过电子数据库搜索(PsycINFO、Web of Science、Scopus、Google Scholar、Cochrane Library、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台、google.com.au、open.grey.eu、Global ETD、开放获取论文和学位论文、EThOS 和 Trove)和与研究人员直接沟通相结合确定的。干预后最常见的改善是父母的行为意向和反应效能,其次是父母的行为,然后是能力、自我效能感、知识,最后是父母的态度。在解决了这些问题的研究中,行为、意向和反应效能的改善发生率为 88%至 100%,自我效能感和能力的改善发生率为 67%至 75%,知识和态度的改善发生率仅为 50%至 56%。许多纳入的评估研究存在方法学和报告缺陷,例如参与者大量流失、缺乏对照组、缺乏统计检验、错过测试时间点以及缺乏(或短期)随访。未来以父母为重点的 CSA 预防评估必须通过使用健全的方法和全面的报告来开展严格的实证研究来解决这些问题。此外,研究设计应考虑衡量评估父母变量增加的实际影响,包括他们预防儿童性虐待的能力。