, Baltimore, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Mar 16;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00765-2.
Community-based harm reduction vending machines (HRVM) are not new to the field of public health; numerous countries have implemented them in response to the needs of people who use drugs over the last three decades. However, until recently, few existed in the United States. Given the rapidity with which communities are standing up harm reduction vending machines, there is a pressing need for a consolidated examination of implementation evidence. This scoping review summarizes existing literature using multiple implementation science frameworks.
The scoping review was conducted in five stages including (1) Identify the research question; (2) Identify relevant studies; (3) Select the publications based on inclusion/exclusion criteria; (4) Review and extract data; and, (5) Summarize results. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched and authors screened publications in English from any year. Data were extracted by applying implementation constructs from RE-AIM and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Both frameworks provided a useful lens through which to develop knowledge about the facilitators and barriers to HRVM implementation. The review is reported according to PRISMA guidelines.
After applying the full inclusion and exclusion criteria, including the intervention of interest ("vending machines") and population of interest ("people who use drugs"), a total of 22 studies were included in the scoping review. None of the studies reported on race, making it difficult to retroactively apply a racial equity lens. Among those articles that examined effectiveness, the outcomes were mixed between clear effectiveness and inconclusive results. Evidence emerged, however, to address all CFIR constructs, and positive outcomes were observed from HRVM's after-hour availability and increased program reach.
HRVM implementation best practices include maximizing accessibility up to 24 h, 7 days a week, offering syringe disposal options, ensuring capability of data collection, and allowing for anonymity of use. Organizations that implement HRVM should establish strong feedback loops between them, their program participants, and the broader community upfront. Considerations for future research include rigorous study designs to evaluate effectiveness outcomes (e.g. reduced drug overdose deaths) and examination of HRVM reach among ethnic and racial communities.
社区为基础的减少伤害售货机(HRVM)在公共卫生领域并不新鲜;在过去三十年中,许多国家为满足吸毒者的需求而实施了这些售货机。然而,直到最近,美国才出现了一些这样的售货机。由于社区迅速设立减少伤害售货机,因此迫切需要对实施证据进行综合检查。本范围综述使用多个实施科学框架总结了现有文献。
该范围综述分五个阶段进行,包括:(1)确定研究问题;(2)确定相关研究;(3)根据纳入/排除标准选择出版物;(4)审查和提取数据;以及,(5)总结结果。检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science,并筛选了来自任何年份的英文出版物。通过应用从 RE-AIM 和实施研究综合框架(CFIR)中提取的实施结构来提取数据。这两个框架都为了解 HRVM 实施的促进因素和障碍提供了有用的视角。综述按照 PRISMA 指南进行报告。
在应用完整的纳入和排除标准(包括感兴趣的干预措施(“售货机”)和感兴趣的人群(“吸毒者”)后,共有 22 项研究被纳入范围综述。没有一项研究报告种族问题,因此难以追溯应用种族公平视角。在那些检查效果的文章中,结果在明显有效和结果不确定之间存在差异。然而,出现了证据来解决所有 CFIR 结构,并且从 HRVM 的 24 小时可用性和增加的项目覆盖范围中观察到了积极的结果。
HRVM 实施的最佳实践包括最大限度地提高每周 7 天、每天 24 小时的可及性,提供注射器处置选项,确保数据收集能力,并允许匿名使用。实施 HRVM 的组织应在前期建立它们之间、它们的项目参与者和更广泛社区之间的强大反馈循环。未来研究的考虑因素包括严格的研究设计,以评估效果结果(例如减少药物过量死亡),并检查 HRVM 在族裔和种族社区中的覆盖范围。