Flavin Lila, Rosen Joseph G, St John Kristen, Hallowell Benjamin D, Weidele Heidi R, Krieger Maxwell S, McKenzie Michelle, Green Traci C, Rich Josiah D, Park Ju Nyeong
J Addict Med. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001502.
This study investigated community bystander presence and naloxone administrations by location type during accidental fatal opioid-involved overdoses in Rhode Island.
We analyzed accidental opioid-involved overdose fatalities among adults in Rhode Island between 2020 and 2022, obtained from the State's Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System (SUDORS). Variables of interest included location of death, community bystander presence, and naloxone administration. We calculated the proportion of overdose deaths where community bystanders were present and naloxone was administered. Using multivariable Poisson regression with robust standard errors, we identified statistically significant ( P <0.05) correlates of naloxone administration by any responder during fatal overdose events.
Of 1084 opioid-involved overdose fatalities analyzed, bystanders were present in 44.7% of cases. Most fatal overdoses occurred in housing environments (84.5%), where the widest disparity between bystander presence (61.1%) and naloxone administration (29.0%) was observed. In multivariable analysis, naloxone was more likely to be administered in overdoses occurring in outdoor spaces (adjusted prevalence ratio [adjPR] = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.07-2.02), hotels/motels (adjPR=1.57, CI: 1.12-2.21), businesses (adjPR=1.89, CI: 1.14-3.12), and motor vehicles (adjPR=2.00, CI: 1.18-3.38), relative to overdoses in housing environments. Naloxone administration clustered in younger decedents (10-year decrements: adjPR=1.10, CI: 1.01-1.20) and persons experiencing homelessness (adjPR=1.67, CI: 1.23-2.26).
Fatal opioid-involved overdoses in housing environments were more likely to have community bystanders present but less likely to have responders intervene with naloxone. Equipping families and cohabitants with the tools, resources, and self-efficacy for earlier, timelier naloxone intervention may address overdose fatalities in Rhode Island.
本研究调查了罗德岛州意外致命性阿片类药物过量服用事件中按地点类型划分的社区旁观者在场情况及纳洛酮使用情况。
我们分析了2020年至2022年间罗德岛州成年人中涉及阿片类药物的意外过量服用死亡案例,数据来自该州的意外药物过量报告系统(SUDORS)。感兴趣的变量包括死亡地点、社区旁观者在场情况以及纳洛酮的使用。我们计算了有社区旁观者在场且使用了纳洛酮的过量服用死亡案例的比例。使用具有稳健标准误差的多变量泊松回归分析,我们确定了在致命过量服用事件中任何应答者使用纳洛酮的具有统计学意义(P<0.05)的相关因素。
在分析的1084例涉及阿片类药物的过量服用死亡案例中,44.7%的案例有旁观者在场。大多数致命的过量服用事件发生在居住环境中(84.5%),在这种环境中,旁观者在场情况(61.1%)与纳洛酮使用情况(29.0%)之间的差距最大。在多变量分析中,相对于发生在居住环境中的过量服用事件,在户外空间发生的过量服用事件中更有可能使用纳洛酮(调整患病率比[adjPR]=1.50,95%置信区间:1.07-2.02),在酒店/汽车旅馆(adjPR=1.57,置信区间:1.12-2.21)、企业(adjPR=1.89,置信区间:1.14-3.12)和机动车内(adjPR=2.00,置信区间:1.18-3.38)发生的过量服用事件中也是如此。纳洛酮的使用集中在较年轻的死者(每10年递减:adjPR=1.10,置信区间:1.01-1.20)和无家可归者(adjPR=1.67,置信区间:1.23-2.26)中。
在居住环境中发生的致命性阿片类药物过量服用事件更有可能有社区旁观者在场,但应答者使用纳洛酮进行干预的可能性较小。为家庭和同居者提供工具、资源以及早期、及时使用纳洛酮干预的自我效能感,可能有助于解决罗德岛州的过量服用死亡问题。