Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
Glasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 16;13(3):e069979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069979.
This research investigates how community-led organisations' (CLOs') use of assets-based approaches improves health and well-being, and how that might be different in different contexts. Assets-based approaches involve 'doing with' rather than 'doing to' and bring people in communities together to achieve positive change using their own knowledge, skills and experience. Some studies have shown that such approaches can have a positive effect on health and well-being. However, research is limited, and we know little about which approaches lead to which outcomes and how different contexts might affect success.
Using a realist approach, we will work with 15 CLOs based in disadvantaged communities in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. A realist synthesis of review papers, and a policy analysis in different contexts, precedes qualitative interviews and workshops with stakeholders, to find out how CLOs' programmes work and identify existing data. We will explore participants' experiences through: a Q methodology study; participatory photography workshops; qualitative interviews and measure outcomes using a longitudinal survey, with 225 CLO participants, to assess impact for people who connect with the CLOs. An economic analysis will estimate costs and benefits to participants, for different contexts and mechanisms. A 'Lived Experience Panel' of people connected with our CLOs as participants or volunteers, will ensure the appropriateness of the research, interpretation and reporting of findings.
This project, research tools and consent processes have been approved by the Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health and Life Sciences Ethics Committee, and affirmed by Ethics Committees at Bournemouth University, Queen's University Belfast and the University of East London. Common Health Assets does not involve any National Health Service sites, staff or patients.Findings will be presented through social media, project website, blogs, policy briefings, journal articles, conferences and visually in short digital stories, and photographic exhibitions.
本研究旨在探讨社区主导组织(CLOs)如何利用基于资产的方法来改善健康和福祉,以及在不同背景下这种方法可能有何不同。基于资产的方法涉及“用……做”而不是“对……做”,并将社区中的人们聚集在一起,利用他们自己的知识、技能和经验来实现积极的变革。一些研究表明,这种方法对健康和福祉可能有积极影响。然而,研究有限,我们对哪些方法导致哪些结果以及不同背景如何影响成功知之甚少。
我们将采用现实主义方法,与英格兰、苏格兰和北爱尔兰的 15 个处于不利社区的 CLO 合作。在不同背景下进行综述论文的现实主义综合分析和政策分析之后,我们将与利益相关者进行定性访谈和研讨会,以了解 CLO 计划如何运作并确定现有数据。我们将通过以下方式探索参与者的经验:Q 方法研究;参与式摄影研讨会;定性访谈;使用纵向调查评估与 CLO 有联系的 225 名参与者的结果,以评估对与 CLO 有联系的人的影响。经济分析将评估不同背景和机制下参与者的成本和收益。一个由与我们的 CLO 有联系的人组成的“生活体验小组”,作为参与者或志愿者,将确保研究、解释和报告结果的适当性。
本项目、研究工具和同意程序已获得格拉斯哥喀里多尼亚大学健康与生命科学伦理委员会的批准,并得到伯恩茅斯大学、贝尔法斯特女王大学和东伦敦大学伦理委员会的认可。共同健康资产不涉及任何国民保健服务场所、员工或患者。研究结果将通过社交媒体、项目网站、博客、政策简报、期刊文章、会议以及简短的数字故事和摄影展览进行呈现。