• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人听力障碍:纵向结局研究(HALOS)方案。

A protocol for the Hearing impairment in Adults: A Longitudinal Outcomes Study (HALOS).

机构信息

Macquarie University Hearing, Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0283171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283171. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0283171
PMID:36928424
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10019733/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Often considered an "invisible disability", hearing loss is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases and the third leading cause for years lived with disability worldwide. Hearing loss has substantial impacts on communication, psychological wellbeing, social connectedness, cognition, quality of life, and economic independence. The Hearing impairment in Adults: a Longitudinal Outcomes Study (HALOS) aims to evaluate the: (1) impacts of hearing devices (hearing aids and/or cochlear implants), (2) differences in timing of these interventions and in long-term outcomes between hearing aid and cochlear implant users, and (3) cost-effectiveness of early intervention for adult-onset hearing loss among hearing device users.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HALOS is a mixed-methods study collecting cross-sectional and longitudinal data on health and social outcomes from 908 hearing aid and/or cochlear implant users aged ≥40 years, recruited from hearing service providers across Australia. The quantitative component will involve an online survey at baseline (time of recruitment), 24-months, and 48-months and will collect audiological, health, psychosocial, functional and employment outcomes using validated instruments. The qualitative component will be conducted in a subset of participants at baseline and involve semi-structured interviews to understand the patient journey and perspectives on the Australian hearing service model.

ETHICS

This study has been approved by the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (ID: 11262) and Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (ID: LNR/22/SAC/88). Dissemination of results: Study findings will be disseminated to participants via a one-page summary, and to the public through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) registration number: ACTRN12622000752763.

摘要

背景

听力损失通常被认为是一种“隐形残疾”,是全球最普遍的慢性疾病之一,也是导致伤残调整寿命年的第三大原因。听力损失对交流、心理健康、社交联系、认知、生活质量和经济独立都有重大影响。成人听力障碍:纵向结局研究(HALOS)旨在评估:(1)听力设备(助听器和/或人工耳蜗)的影响;(2)助听器和人工耳蜗使用者干预时机和长期结果的差异;(3)助听器使用者成人听力损失早期干预的成本效益。

材料和方法

HALOS 是一项混合方法研究,从澳大利亚各地的听力服务提供者中招募了 908 名年龄≥40 岁的助听器和/或人工耳蜗使用者,收集健康和社会结果的横断面和纵向数据。定量部分将包括基线(招募时)、24 个月和 48 个月的在线调查,使用经过验证的工具收集听力、健康、心理社会、功能和就业结果。定性部分将在基线的一部分参与者中进行,包括半结构化访谈,以了解患者的就诊过程和对澳大利亚听力服务模式的看法。

伦理

本研究已获得麦考瑞大学人类研究伦理委员会(ID:11262)和南阿德莱德当地卫生网络(ID:LNR/22/SAC/88)的批准。研究结果的传播:将通过一页摘要向参与者传播研究结果,并通过在同行评议期刊上发表文章和在会议上发表演讲向公众传播。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)注册号:ACTRN12622000752763。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c7/10019733/a8b4b7ec36d3/pone.0283171.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c7/10019733/a8b4b7ec36d3/pone.0283171.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c7/10019733/a8b4b7ec36d3/pone.0283171.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A protocol for the Hearing impairment in Adults: A Longitudinal Outcomes Study (HALOS).成人听力障碍:纵向结局研究(HALOS)方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0283171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283171. eCollection 2023.
2
Addressing clinical equipoise for hearing devices: the qualitative COACH (q-COACH) study protocol for Australian stakeholder involvement in the design of a randomised controlled trial.解决听力设备的临床 equipoise:澳大利亚利益相关者参与随机对照试验设计的定性 COACH(q-COACH)研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 8;9(9):e030100. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030100.
3
Qualitative, multimethod study of behavioural and attitudinal responses to cochlear implantation from the patient and healthcare professional perspective in Australia and the UK: study protocol.从患者和医疗保健专业人员角度对澳大利亚和英国人工耳蜗植入行为和态度反应的定性多方法研究:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 May 29;8(5):e019623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019623.
4
Impact of hearing impairment and cochlear implantation on productivity and social well-being in a professionally active but severely hearing-impaired group: protocol of the 'Hear again, work again' longitudinal prospective cohort study.职业活跃但重度听力受损人群中听力障碍及人工耳蜗植入对生产力和社会福祉的影响:“再次听见,再次工作”纵向前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 8;13(3):e064514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064514.
5
Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the lived experience of hearing loss and patient reported experience in the UK: the HeLP study.一项探索英国听力损失患者生活体验和患者报告体验的定性研究方案:HeLP 研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e069363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069363.
6
Changes on clinical and participatory outcomes in people with severe-to-profound hearing loss after cochlear implantation: protocol of a multicentre prospective observational cohort study - Societal Merit of Intervention on Hearing Loss Evaluation (SMILE).重度至极重度听力损失患者人工耳蜗植入后临床和参与性结局的变化:多中心前瞻性观察队列研究方案-社会对听力损失评估干预的影响(SMILE)。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 27;13(6):e072689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072689.
7
ARCHS: adult recipients of cochlear implants: health and social long-term outcomes-a state-specific and national population-based retrospective cohort study protocol.ARCHS:人工耳蜗植入的成年受者:健康和社会长期结局——一项基于州别和全国人群的回顾性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e065567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065567.
8
Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.成人助听器使用者人工耳蜗植入后言语理解能力评估:一项非随机对照试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct 1;146(10):916-924. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1584.
9
Randomised controlled feasibility trial of the Active Communication Education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE to HEAR): a study protocol.随机对照可行性试验,研究主动沟通教育计划联合助听器供给与单独助听器供给的效果(ACE 到 HEAR):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 1;8(7):e021502. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021502.
10
Psychosocial health of cochlear implant users compared to that of adults with and without hearing aids: Results of a nationwide cohort study.人工耳蜗使用者与使用助听器的成年人和非听力障碍成年人的社会心理健康比较:一项全国性队列研究的结果。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Jun;43(3):828-834. doi: 10.1111/coa.13055. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in Saudi Arabia: Pathways to Early Diagnosis, Intervention, and National Policy.沙特阿拉伯听力障碍的患病率:早期诊断、干预及国家政策途径
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 11;13(16):1964. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161964.
2
Prevalence of self-reported hearing loss and its association with depression in individuals aged 15 years and above in a large-scale representative sample: evidence from a nationwide population-based cross-sectional study.大规模代表性样本中15岁及以上人群自我报告的听力损失患病率及其与抑郁症的关联:一项基于全国人口的横断面研究证据
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09562-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Hearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990-2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.听力损失的患病率和残疾生存年数,1990-2019 年:来自 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的结果。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):996-1009. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00516-X.
2
Cost-benefit Analysis of Cochlear Implants: A Societal Perspective.人工耳蜗植入的成本效益分析:社会视角。
Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1338-1350. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001021.
3
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission.
A protocol for the HEaring Impairment Data Infrastructure (HEIDI) study.
一项关于听力障碍数据基础设施(HEIDI)研究的方案。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0320294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320294. eCollection 2025.
4
Understanding hearing health-care access in Australia: Users' perspectives.了解澳大利亚的听力保健服务:用户视角
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Jun;44(2):e70029. doi: 10.1111/ajag.70029.
《痴呆症的预防、干预与照护:柳叶刀委员会2020年报告》
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
PROMIS Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains.PROMIS 成人健康概况量表:七个健康领域的高效简明测量工具。
Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):537-544. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.004.
5
Hearing impairment and daily-life fatigue: a qualitative study.听力障碍与日常生活疲劳:一项定性研究。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Jul;58(7):408-416. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1597284. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
6
Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.社会参与限制问卷的细化和验证:Rasch 分析和传统心理测量分析技术的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):328-339. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000618.
7
Coping together with hearing loss: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the psychosocial experiences of people with hearing loss and their communication partners.共同应对听力损失:对听力损失者及其沟通伙伴心理社会经历的质性元分析
Int J Audiol. 2017 May;56(5):297-305. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1286695. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
Quality of life after intervention with a cochlear implant or hearing aid.人工耳蜗植入或助听器干预后的生活质量。
Laryngoscope. 2016 Sep;126(9):2110-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.25848. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
9
BPS-ICF model, a tool to measure biopsychosocial functioning and disability within ICF concepts: theory and practice updated.BPS-ICF模型,一种在国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)概念内测量生物心理社会功能和残疾的工具:理论与实践的更新
Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Mar;39(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000151.
10
Prevalence and risk factors of food insecurity among a cohort of older Australians.在一组澳大利亚老年人中,食物不安全的流行情况及其危险因素。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2014 Jan;18(1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s12603-013-0339-6.