Talo Seija A, Rytökoski Ulla M
aDepartment of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku bRehabilitation Orton, Invalid Foundation, Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Mar;39(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000151.
The transformation of International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps into International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) meant a lot for those needing to communicate in terms of functioning concept in their daily work. With ICF's commonly understood language, the decades' uncertainty on what concepts and terms describe functioning and disabilities seemed to be dispelled. Instead, operationalizing ICF to measure the level of functioning along with the new nomenclature has not been as unambiguous. Transforming linguistic terms into quantified functioning seems to need another type of theorizing. Irrespective of challenging tasks, numerous projects were formulated during the past decades to apply ICF for measurement purposes. This article updates one of them, the so-called biopsychosocial-ICF model, which uses all ICF categories but classifies them into more components than ICF for measurement purposes. The model suggests that both disabilities and functional resources should be described by collecting and organizing functional measurement data in a multidisciplinary, biopsychosocial data matrice.
《国际损伤、残疾和障碍分类》转变为《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF),这对于那些在日常工作中需要依据功能概念进行交流的人来说意义重大。借助ICF通用的语言,数十年来关于用哪些概念和术语来描述功能及残疾的不确定性似乎消除了。然而,将ICF用于衡量功能水平以及采用新的术语并非那么明确。将语言术语转化为量化的功能似乎需要另一种理论构建。尽管存在具有挑战性的任务,但在过去几十年里仍制定了众多项目,旨在将ICF用于测量目的。本文更新其中一个项目,即所谓的生物心理社会 - ICF模型,该模型使用了ICF的所有类别,但为了测量目的,将它们分类为比ICF更多的组成部分。该模型表明,应通过在多学科生物心理社会数据矩阵中收集和组织功能测量数据,来描述残疾和功能资源。