International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Allied Health and Human Performance Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Qual Life Res. 2023 Aug;32(8):2247-2257. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03387-0. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
This study analysed data from a national survey of people living in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs) reporting on what is the best thing about where they live and suggestions for improvement. Data from prior to the Covid-19 pandemic were compared with data during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Qualitative data from the Happy Life Index Survey were analysed using summative content analysis to code the responses in the data sets and then organise them into categories. Once categorised, the pre-Covid-19 and mid-Covid-19 data sets were compared using descriptive statistics.
A total of 4745 residents, from over 100 RACFs, provided 8512 open-text responses to at least one of the two survey questions. Pre-Covid-19 responses were compared with mid-Covid-19 responses and those trending towards relevance (5-10% change) were identified. There were both positive and negative relevant percent changes for staff number, food (general comments), and friendliness. A trending positive percentage change was observed for staff quality and the internal environment. There was a trending negative relevant percentage change for lifestyle activities, staff generally, level of contentedness, the general environment, general choice, and general views about the service.
People living in RACFs notice the changes in staffing levels and visitors during restrictions imposed during infectious outbreaks. During these times, they appreciate the quality of the staff attending to their needs and the quality of their food. Further exploration is needed of the value of lifestyle activities and strategies to promote feelings of contentedness and general wellbeing during times of restriction.
本研究分析了一项针对澳大利亚居住在养老机构(RACF)的居民的全国性调查数据,报告他们居住的地方的最佳之处以及改进建议。将新冠疫情前的数据与疫情期间的数据进行了比较。
使用总结性内容分析对“幸福生活指数调查”中的定性数据进行分析,对数据集的回答进行编码,然后将其组织成类别。分类后,使用描述性统计数据比较新冠疫情前和新冠疫情中期的数据集。
共有来自 100 多个 RACF 的 4745 名居民对两个调查问题中的至少一个问题提供了 8512 条开放式文本回复。将新冠疫情前的回复与新冠疫情中期的回复进行了比较,并确定了那些具有相关性(变化 5-10%)的回复。员工人数、食物(一般评论)和友好度的正相关和负相关百分比变化都有。员工素质和内部环境呈正相关的百分比变化趋势。生活方式活动、员工整体、满足感、总体环境、一般选择以及对服务的总体看法呈负相关的百分比变化趋势。
居住在 RACF 的人注意到在传染病爆发期间实施限制措施时工作人员人数和访客的变化。在这些时候,他们赞赏照顾他们需求的工作人员的素质以及他们的食物质量。在限制期间,需要进一步探索生活方式活动的价值以及促进满足感和总体幸福感的策略。