• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱沙尼亚多系统疾病患者不良事件研究采用爱沙尼亚触发工具(MUPETT-MUltimorbid Patients-Estonian Trigger Tool)。多系统疾病患者爱沙尼亚触发工具的开发。一项混合方法研究的研究方案。

Estonian adverse events study for multimorbid patients using Estonian Trigger Tool (MUPETT-MUltimorbid Patients-Estonian Trigger Tool). Development of Estonian trigger tool for multimorbid patients. A study protocol for mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0280200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280200. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0280200
PMID:36928658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10019657/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is widely recognized that providing healthcare may produce harm to the patient. Different approaches have been developed to measure the burden of adverse events (AEs) to plan and measure the effects of interventions. One of the most widely used instruments is the Trigger Tool, which has previously been modified to be used on various settings and translated into many languages. Multimorbidity complicates care and may increase the number of AEs patients experience. Currently there is no instrument designed to measure AEs in multimorbid patients. In Estonia, there is currently no validated instrument to measure the burden of AEs.

AIMS

The aim of this study will be evaluating the characteristics and ocurrence of AEs in multimorbid patients in hospitalised internal medicine patients of Estonia, and describes the development of a trigger tool for this purpose.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search for the evidence on measuring AEs in the population of multimorbid patients focusing on trigger tools, and synthesize the data. Data collection of the triggers from the literature will be followed by translating triggers from English to Estonian. An expert multidisciplinary panel will select the suitable triggers for this population. Trigger tool will be pre-tested to assess agreement among professionals and usability of the tool. Validation will be done using 90 medical records. A cross-sectional study in internal medicine departments of two Estonian tertiary care hospitals will be performed to identify the frequency and characteristics of AEs in 960 medical records. We will also provide preventability potential and influencing factors.

DISSEMINATION

Results will be disseminated to healthcare providers and stakeholders at national and international conferences, and as a doctoral medical thesis.

摘要

简介

人们普遍认识到,提供医疗保健可能会对患者造成伤害。已经开发出不同的方法来衡量不良事件(AE)的负担,以规划和衡量干预措施的效果。使用最广泛的工具之一是触发工具,该工具之前已被修改用于各种环境并翻译成多种语言。多病共存使护理变得复杂,并可能增加患者经历的 AE 数量。目前尚无专门用于测量多病共存患者 AE 的工具。在爱沙尼亚,目前尚无经过验证的工具来衡量 AE 的负担。

目的

本研究的目的将评估爱沙尼亚住院内科患者中多病共存患者 AE 的特征和发生情况,并描述为此目的开发触发工具的情况。

方法和分析

我们将搜索有关在多病共存患者人群中测量 AE 的证据,重点是触发工具,并对数据进行综合分析。我们将从文献中收集有关触发器的数据,然后将触发器从英语翻译成爱沙尼亚语。一个多学科专家小组将为该人群选择合适的触发器。将对触发工具进行预测试,以评估专业人员之间的一致性和工具的可用性。将使用 90 份病历进行验证。将在爱沙尼亚两家三级保健医院的内科部门进行横断面研究,以确定 960 份病历中 AE 的频率和特征。我们还将提供可预防的可能性和影响因素。

传播

研究结果将在国家和国际会议以及博士医学论文中向医疗保健提供者和利益相关者传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0482/10019657/77846e92fb98/pone.0280200.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0482/10019657/77846e92fb98/pone.0280200.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0482/10019657/77846e92fb98/pone.0280200.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Estonian adverse events study for multimorbid patients using Estonian Trigger Tool (MUPETT-MUltimorbid Patients-Estonian Trigger Tool). Development of Estonian trigger tool for multimorbid patients. A study protocol for mixed-methods study.爱沙尼亚多系统疾病患者不良事件研究采用爱沙尼亚触发工具(MUPETT-MUltimorbid Patients-Estonian Trigger Tool)。多系统疾病患者爱沙尼亚触发工具的开发。一项混合方法研究的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0280200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280200. eCollection 2023.
2
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.验证触发因素并开发用于识别不良事件的儿科触发工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5.
3
The Emergency Department Trigger Tool: Validation and Testing to Optimize Yield.急诊科触发工具:验证和测试以优化效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1279-1290. doi: 10.1111/acem.14101. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Adverse events identified by the global trigger tool at a university hospital: A retrospective medical record review.全球触发工具在一所大学医院识别的不良事件:回顾性病历审查。
J Evid Based Med. 2019 May;12(2):91-97. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12329. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.开发一种触发工具,以识别影响到接受家庭医疗保健患者的不良事件和无伤害事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):502-511. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Incidence of adverse events in Sweden during 2013-2016: a cohort study describing the implementation of a national trigger tool.2013 - 2016年瑞典不良事件的发生率:一项描述国家触发工具实施情况的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e020833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020833.
8
Comparison of traditional trigger tool to data warehouse based screening for identifying hospital adverse events.传统触发工具与数据仓库筛查在识别医院不良事件中的比较。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):130-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001102. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
9
Adverse events in psychiatry: a national cohort study in Sweden with a unique psychiatric trigger tool.精神病学中的不良事件:瑞典一项具有独特精神科触发工具的全国队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2447-2.
10
Application of the emergency medical services trigger tool to measure adverse events in prehospital emergency care: a time series analysis.应用急诊医疗服务触发工具测量院前急救中的不良事件:一项时间序列分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0195-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of chronic conditions and multimorbidity in Estonia: a population-based cross-sectional study.爱沙尼亚慢性疾病和多种疾病的患病率:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 5;11(10):e049045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049045.
2
Evolving Factors in Hospital Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital Adverse Events.医院安全的演变因素:医院不良事件的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1285-e1295. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000889.
3
Assessment of the reliability of the IHI Global Trigger Tool: new perspectives from a Brazilian study.
评估 IHI 全球触发工具的可靠性:来自巴西研究的新视角。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 18;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab039.
4
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Measurement Properties of the Portuguese Version of the Global Trigger Tool for Adverse Events.不良事件全球触发工具葡萄牙语版本的翻译、跨文化调适及测量属性
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Dec 3;16:1175-1183. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S282294. eCollection 2020.
5
Applying the Global Trigger Tool in German Hospitals: A Pilot in Surgery and Neurosurgery.在德国医院应用全球触发工具:外科和神经外科的初步尝试。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):e340-e351. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000576.
6
Establishment of a pediatric trigger tool based on Global Trigger Tool to identify adverse drug events of children: experience in a Chinese hospital.基于全球触发工具建立儿科触发工具以识别儿童药物不良事件:一家中国医院的经验
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02354-9.
7
The Emergency Department Trigger Tool: Validation and Testing to Optimize Yield.急诊科触发工具:验证和测试以优化效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1279-1290. doi: 10.1111/acem.14101. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
8
Utility of a trigger tool (TRIGGER-CHRON) to detect adverse events associated with high-alert medications in patients with multimorbidity.一种触发工具(TRIGGER-CHRON)在患有多种疾病的患者中检测与高警示药物相关的不良事件的效用。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e41-e46. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002126. Epub 2020 May 8.
9
Validating the Chinese geriatric trigger tool and analyzing adverse drug event associated risk factors in elderly Chinese patients: A retrospective review.验证中文老年触发工具并分析老年中国患者药物不良事件相关风险因素:回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232095. eCollection 2020.
10
Identifying no-harm incidents in home healthcare: a cohort study using trigger tool methodology.识别家庭医疗保健中的无伤害事件:使用触发工具方法的队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05139-z.