Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jun;16(6):1049-1062. doi: 10.1111/cts.13511. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
Observational studies have identified the potential prognostic value for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, viral load in nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs produced inconsistent results in prognostic analyses, and the prognostic value of viral load or antibodies has not been confirmed in large clinical trials. COVACTA and REMDACTA were double-blind, randomized, controlled trials with a combined enrollment of 1078 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab or placebo in COVACTA or tocilizumab plus remdesivir or placebo plus remdesivir in REMDACTA. We assessed the potential prognostic value of NP and serum SARS-CoV-2 viral load and serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at baseline as biomarkers for clinical outcomes in patients enrolled in these trials. In adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, serum viral load was a more reliable predictor of clinical outcomes than NP viral load; high serum viral load was associated with higher risk for death and mechanical ventilation/death and lower likelihood of hospital discharge (high vs. negative viral load hazard ratios [95% confidence interval {CI}] were 2.87 [1.57-5.25], 3.86 [2.23-6.68], and 0.23 [0.14-0.36], respectively, in COVACTA and 8.11 [2.95-22.26], 10.29 [4.5-23.55], and 0.21 [0.15-0.29], respectively, in REMDACTA) and high serum viral load correlated with levels of inflammatory cytokines and lung damage biomarkers. High anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody (ACOV2S) levels were associated with higher likelihood of hospital discharge (high vs. below the limit of quantification hazard ratios [95% CI] were 2.55 [1.59-4.08] for COVACTA and 1.54 [1.13-2.09] for REMDACTA). These results support the role of baseline SARS-CoV-2 serum viral load and ACOV2S antibody titers in predicting clinical outcomes for patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
观察性研究已经确定了严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒载量和抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中的潜在预后价值。然而,鼻咽(NP)拭子中的病毒载量在预后分析中产生了不一致的结果,并且病毒载量或抗体的预后价值尚未在大型临床试验中得到证实。COVACTA 和 REMDACTA 是两项双盲、随机、对照试验,共纳入了 1078 名因 COVID-19 住院的患者,这些患者在 COVACTA 中接受托珠单抗或安慰剂治疗,或在 REMDACTA 中接受托珠单抗加瑞德西韦或安慰剂加瑞德西韦治疗。我们评估了这些试验中纳入的患者基线时 NP 和血清 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量和血清抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的潜在预后价值,作为临床结局的生物标志物。在调整后的 Cox 比例风险模型中,血清病毒载量是临床结局的更可靠预测指标,高于 NP 病毒载量;高血清病毒载量与死亡和机械通气/死亡的风险增加以及出院的可能性降低相关(高病毒载量与阴性病毒载量的危险比[95%置信区间{CI}]分别为 2.87[1.57-5.25]、3.86[2.23-6.68]和 0.23[0.14-0.36],在 COVACTA 和 8.11[2.95-22.26]、10.29[4.5-23.55]和 0.21[0.15-0.29],分别在 REMDACTA),并且高血清病毒载量与炎症细胞因子和肺损伤生物标志物的水平相关。高抗 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白抗体(ACOV2S)水平与更高的出院可能性相关(高与低于定量下限的危险比[95%CI]分别为 2.55[1.59-4.08],COVACTA 和 1.54[1.13-2.09],REMDACTA)。这些结果支持基线 SARS-CoV-2 血清病毒载量和 ACOV2S 抗体滴度在预测 COVID-19 住院患者临床结局中的作用。