• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体在感官加工敏感性上的差异会放大学习后活动的效果,无论是好是坏。

Individual differences in sensory processing sensitivity amplify effects of post-learning activity for better and for worse.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-5060, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 17;13(1):4451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31192-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-31192-9
PMID:36932138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10023813/
Abstract

Sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) is a biologically-based trait associated with greater reactivity to both positive and negative environments. Recent studies suggest that the activity following learning can support or hinder memory retention. Here, we employed a within-subject experiment to examine whether and how individual differences in SPS contribute to differences in memory retention. Sixty-four participants encoded and immediately recalled two word lists: one followed by 8-min of eyes-closed, wakeful resting; and the other by a distraction task. After 7 days, participants completed a surprise free recall test for both word lists. If participants wakefully rested after encoding, memory retention increased as a function of higher SPS. However, in the distraction condition, a negative curvilinear relationship indicated that memory retention was especially hindered for highly sensitive individuals. These results suggest that individual differences in SPS are an important factor to consider when examining the effects of environmental conditions on learning and memory.

摘要

感觉加工敏感性(SPS)是一种与对积极和消极环境的更大反应性相关的基于生物学的特征。最近的研究表明,学习后的活动可以支持或阻碍记忆保留。在这里,我们采用了一项被试内实验来检验 SPS 的个体差异是否以及如何导致记忆保留的差异。64 名参与者对两个单词列表进行编码并立即回忆:一个在闭眼、清醒休息 8 分钟后进行;另一个则进行干扰任务。7 天后,参与者对两个单词列表进行了惊喜自由回忆测试。如果参与者在编码后清醒地休息,那么记忆保留会随着 SPS 的增加而增加。然而,在干扰条件下,负曲线关系表明,记忆保留对高度敏感的个体特别不利。这些结果表明,SPS 的个体差异是在研究环境条件对学习和记忆的影响时需要考虑的一个重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8275/10023813/736005fdfc4e/41598_2023_31192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8275/10023813/0f22c43737ba/41598_2023_31192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8275/10023813/736005fdfc4e/41598_2023_31192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8275/10023813/0f22c43737ba/41598_2023_31192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8275/10023813/736005fdfc4e/41598_2023_31192_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual differences in sensory processing sensitivity amplify effects of post-learning activity for better and for worse.个体在感官加工敏感性上的差异会放大学习后活动的效果,无论是好是坏。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 17;13(1):4451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31192-9.
2
Post-encoding wakeful resting supports the retention of new verbal memories in children aged 13-14 years.编码后清醒休息有助于支持 13-14 岁儿童新的言语记忆的保留。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Jun;37(2):199-210. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12267. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
3
Wakeful resting and memory retention: a study with healthy older and younger adults.清醒静息状态与记忆保持:一项针对健康老年人和年轻人的研究。
Cogn Process. 2019 Feb;20(1):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0891-4. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
Individual differences in working memory capacity moderate effects of post-learning activity on memory consolidation over the long term.个体在工作记忆容量上的差异,调节了学习后活动对长期记忆巩固的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17976. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74760-z.
5
Wakeful resting and listening to music contrast their effects on verbal long-term memory in dependence on word concreteness.清醒休息和听音乐对比它们对言语长期记忆的影响取决于单词的具体性。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Sep 3;7(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00415-4.
6
Boosting long-term memory via wakeful rest: intentional rehearsal is not necessary, consolidation is sufficient.通过清醒休息增强长期记忆:无需刻意排练,巩固就足够了。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e109542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109542. eCollection 2014.
7
Sensory Processing Sensitivity Predicts Individual Differences in Resting-State Functional Connectivity Associated with Depth of Processing.感觉加工敏感性预测与加工深度相关的静息态功能连接的个体差异。
Neuropsychobiology. 2021;80(2):185-200. doi: 10.1159/000513527. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.个体在工作记忆容量上的差异决定了眼球运动任务负荷对同时进行的单词回忆表现的影响。
Brain Res. 2011 Jul 5;1399:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
9
Individual differences in encoding strategies and free recall dynamics.编码策略和自由回忆动态中的个体差异。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Oct;72(10):2495-2508. doi: 10.1177/1747021819847441. Epub 2019 May 10.
10
Timing matters: negative emotion elicited 5 min but not 30 min or 45 min after learning enhances consolidation of internal-monitoring source memory.时机很重要:学习后5分钟而非30分钟或45分钟引发的负面情绪会增强内部监控源记忆的巩固。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 May;157:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Waking rest during retention facilitates memory consolidation, but so does social media use.在保持清醒期间休息有助于记忆巩固,但使用社交媒体也有同样效果。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 18;15(1):5884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88363-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Wakeful resting and listening to music contrast their effects on verbal long-term memory in dependence on word concreteness.清醒休息和听音乐对比它们对言语长期记忆的影响取决于单词的具体性。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Sep 3;7(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00415-4.
2
[Norms of the German Version of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G) - Self-Assessment Scale on a German-Speaking Sample].[德语版高敏感人群量表(HSPS-G)的常模 - 以德语区样本为基础的自评量表]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2022 Apr;72(3-04):108-116. doi: 10.1055/a-1494-3892. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
3
Sensory Processing Sensitivity Predicts Individual Differences in Resting-State Functional Connectivity Associated with Depth of Processing.
感觉加工敏感性预测与加工深度相关的静息态功能连接的个体差异。
Neuropsychobiology. 2021;80(2):185-200. doi: 10.1159/000513527. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
Individual differences in working memory capacity moderate effects of post-learning activity on memory consolidation over the long term.个体在工作记忆容量上的差异,调节了学习后活动对长期记忆巩固的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17976. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74760-z.
5
Resting States and Memory Consolidation: A Preregistered Replication and Meta-Analysis.静息态与记忆巩固:一项预先注册的复制与元分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 18;9(1):19345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56033-6.
6
Awake Reactivation of Prior Experiences Consolidates Memories and Biases Cognition.清醒状态下对先前经历的再激活巩固了记忆并影响了认知。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;23(10):876-890. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda.环境敏感性背景下的感觉处理敏感性:批判性回顾与研究议程的制定。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Mar;98:287-305. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
8
Individual differences in long-term memory.个体的长期记忆差异。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jan;145(1):79-139. doi: 10.1037/bul0000176.
9
Fast track to the neocortex: A memory engram in the posterior parietal cortex.快速进入新皮层:后顶叶皮层中的记忆印痕。
Science. 2018 Nov 30;362(6418):1045-1048. doi: 10.1126/science.aau2528.
10
Wakeful resting and memory retention: a study with healthy older and younger adults.清醒静息状态与记忆保持:一项针对健康老年人和年轻人的研究。
Cogn Process. 2019 Feb;20(1):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0891-4. Epub 2018 Oct 30.