• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德语版高敏感人群量表(HSPS-G)的常模 - 以德语区样本为基础的自评量表]

[Norms of the German Version of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G) - Self-Assessment Scale on a German-Speaking Sample].

作者信息

Herzberg Philipp Yorck, Fricke Kai R, Konrad Sandra

机构信息

Professur für Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Psychologische Diagnostik, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2022 Apr;72(3-04):108-116. doi: 10.1055/a-1494-3892. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1055/a-1494-3892
PMID:34544172
Abstract

PROBLEM

The German version of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G) is an instrument for the assessment of sensitivity. Validity of the scale was confirmed in prior research (Konrad & Herzberg, 2017). This paper provides norm values of the HSPS-G for German-speaking countries.

METHOD

To generate norms, data from 7458 participants (6251 female, 1207 male; age ranging: 14-80 years; mean=37.80; SD=11.75) were collected in an online assessment. Participants were German-speaking citizens of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance suggested systematic gender differences in the scores. Thus, gender-specific norms were created for the subscales and the total score of the HSPS-G. The resulting norm values comprising percentiles and T-values enable comparative interpretation of the results of the HSPS-G, enabling the assessment of inter- and intraindividual differences with respect to demographic variables.

摘要

问题

德语版高敏感人群量表(HSPS-G)是一种用于评估敏感性的工具。该量表的有效性已在先前研究中得到证实(康拉德和赫茨伯格,2017年)。本文提供了HSPS-G在德语国家的常模值。

方法

为了生成常模,在一项在线评估中收集了7458名参与者(6251名女性,1207名男性;年龄范围:14 - 80岁;平均年龄 = 37.80;标准差 = 11.75)的数据。参与者为德国、奥地利和瑞士的德语区公民。

结果

方差分析表明得分存在系统性的性别差异。因此,为HSPS-G的分量表和总分创建了特定性别的常模。由此得出的常模值包括百分位数和T值,能够对HSPS-G的结果进行比较性解释,从而能够评估个体间和个体内关于人口统计学变量的差异。

相似文献

1
[Norms of the German Version of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G) - Self-Assessment Scale on a German-Speaking Sample].[德语版高敏感人群量表(HSPS-G)的常模 - 以德语区样本为基础的自评量表]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2022 Apr;72(3-04):108-116. doi: 10.1055/a-1494-3892. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
[Translation of the evidence-based practice confidence (EPIC) scale into German and its cross-cultural adaption for Switzerland, Austria and Germany].[将循证实践信心(EPIC)量表翻译成德语并对其进行针对瑞士、奥地利和德国的跨文化调适]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Dec;149:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.11.005. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
3
Are the American normative standard scores applicable to the German version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G)?美国常模标准分数是否适用于儿科残疾评估量表(PEDI-G)的德文版?
Scand J Occup Ther. 2021 Feb;28(2):110-120. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1726452. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
4
Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting.德国优势与困难问卷自陈版在流行病学背景下的常模数据。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2018 Nov;46(6):523-533. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000589. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
General Population Norms for the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale.一般人群慢性疾病治疗功能评估(FACIT)-疲劳量表的常模。
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1313-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
The German version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ)--Dimensionality, psychometric properties and population-based norms.《人际需求问卷》(INQ)德文版——维度、心理测量特性及基于人群的常模。
J Affect Disord. 2016 May;195:191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.045. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
[New Normative Values for the German Short Version of the Resilience Scale (RS-13)].[德国简短版复原力量表(RS - 13)的新规范值]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2024 Oct;74(9-10):395-402. doi: 10.1055/a-2333-5189. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
8
Self-administration and interviewer-administration of the German Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire: instrument development and assessment of validity and reliability in two randomised studies.德国慢性呼吸问卷的自我管理和访谈者管理:两项随机研究中的工具开发及效度与信度评估
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Jan 8;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-1.
9
[Quality of life in German-speaking patients with spinal cord injuries and bladder dysfunctions. Validation of the German version of the Qualiveen questionnaire].[德语区脊髓损伤和膀胱功能障碍患者的生活质量。Qualiveen问卷德语版的验证]
Urologe A. 2007 Oct;46(10):1416-21. doi: 10.1007/s00120-007-1425-3.
10
[The Kaufman Test System during adolescence: structure and application of the Kaufman-Test zur Intelligenzmessung (K-TIM)].青春期的考夫曼测试系统:考夫曼智力测量测试(K-TIM)的结构与应用
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2010 Jul;38(4):273-82. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000047.

引用本文的文献

1
Painfully Sensitive: How Sensory Processing Sensitivity Affects Healthy Adolescents' Perception of Pain.极度敏感:感觉加工敏感性如何影响健康青少年对疼痛的感知
J Pain Res. 2025 Feb 15;18:719-733. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S473575. eCollection 2025.
2
High sensitivity groups with distinct personality patterns: a person-centered perspective.具有独特人格模式的高敏感性群体:以人为本的视角。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 16;15:1336474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336474. eCollection 2024.
3
Individual differences in sensory processing sensitivity amplify effects of post-learning activity for better and for worse.
个体在感官加工敏感性上的差异会放大学习后活动的效果,无论是好是坏。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 17;13(1):4451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31192-9.