Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Institute and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1629-1635. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01568-0. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
Octogenarians undergoing cystectomy experience higher morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients. Though the non-inferiority of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC) has been established in a generalized population, the benefits of the robotic approach have not been well studied in an aged population. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all patients who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer from 2010 to 2016. Of these, 2527 were performed in patients age 80 or older; 1988 and 539 underwent ORC and RARC, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, RARC was associated with significantly reduced odds for both 30- and 90-day mortality (HR 0.404, p = 0.004; HR 0.694, p = 0.031, respectively), though the association with overall mortality was not significant (HR 0.877, p = 0.061). The robotic group had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to open surgery (10.3 days ORC vs. 9.3 days RARC, p = 0.028). The proportion of cases performed robotically increased over the study period from 12.2% in 2010 to 28.4% in 2016 (p = 0.009, R = 0.774). The study is limited by a retrospective design and a section bias, which was not completely control for in the analysis. In conclusion, RARC provides improved perioperative outcomes in aged patients compared to ORC and a trend toward greater utilization of this technique was observed.
80 岁以上患者行膀胱切除术时,与开放根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)相比,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)的非劣效性已得到广泛证实,但在老年患者人群中,机器人手术的优势尚未得到充分研究。利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)检索 2010 年至 2016 年期间所有因膀胱癌行膀胱切除术的患者。其中 2527 例患者年龄在 80 岁或以上;1988 例和 539 例患者分别行 ORC 和 RARC。Cox 回归分析显示,RARC 与 30 天和 90 天死亡率均显著降低相关(HR 0.404,p=0.004;HR 0.694,p=0.031),但与总死亡率无显著相关性(HR 0.877,p=0.061)。与开放手术相比,机器人组的住院时间(LOS)明显缩短(10.3 天 ORC 与 9.3 天 RARC,p=0.028)。研究期间,机器人手术的比例从 2010 年的 12.2%增加到 2016 年的 28.4%(p=0.009,R=0.774)。本研究存在回顾性设计和部分偏倚的局限性,在分析中并未完全控制这些因素。总之,与 ORC 相比,RARC 为老年患者提供了更好的围手术期结果,并且观察到这种技术的应用呈上升趋势。