• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Modified Delphi Process With Patients, Family Members, and Clinicians.晚期癌症青少年和青年患者质量指标:患者、家庭成员和临床医生参与的改良 Delphi 流程。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jul;66(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Patient, Family, and Clinician Perspectives on End-of-Life Care Quality Domains and Candidate Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.患者、家庭和临床医生对癌症青少年和年轻成人生命末期护理质量领域和候选指标的观点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121888. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21888.
3
What Constitutes Quality of Life? Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer.生活质量的构成要素是什么?晚期癌症青少年和年轻成人的观点。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Dec;21(12):1243-1250. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7067.
4
Identification and Prioritization of Quality Indicators for Conservative Kidney Management.保守性肾脏管理质量指标的识别和优先级排序。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Feb;73(2):174-183. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
Development of System Performance Indicators for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Care and Control in Canada.加拿大青少年和青年癌症护理与控制的系统绩效指标的制定。
Value Health. 2020 Jan;23(1):74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Selection of quality indicators for hospital-based emergency care in Denmark, informed by a modified-Delphi process.通过改良德尔菲法确定丹麦医院急诊护理质量指标
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Feb 3;24:11. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0203-x.
7
Improving End-of-Life Communication and Decision Making: The Development of a Conceptual Framework and Quality Indicators.改善临终沟通与决策:概念框架及质量指标的制定
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jun;49(6):1070-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
8
Identification of adolescents and young adults' preferences and priorities for future cancer treatment using a novel decision-making tool.利用一种新的决策工具确定青少年和年轻人对未来癌症治疗的偏好和优先事项。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Jan;68(1):e28755. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28755. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
"The simple life experiences that every other human gets": Desire for normalcy among adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer.“普通人的简单生活体验”:晚期癌症青少年和年轻人对正常生活的渴望。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Jan;70(1):e30035. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30035. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
10
Population-Based Quality Indicators for Palliative Care Programs for Cancer Patients in Japan: A Delphi Study.日本癌症患者姑息治疗项目基于人群的质量指标:一项德尔菲研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Apr;51(4):652-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing and Outcomes of Palliative Care Integration Into Care of Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer.将姑息治疗整合到晚期癌症青少年和青年患者护理中的时机与结果
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 May 13:OP2400907. doi: 10.1200/OP-24-00907.
2
Preferred and Actual Location of Death in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.癌症青少年和青年患者的首选及实际死亡地点
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454000. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54000.
3
Survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer: MASCC-ASCO standards and practice recommendations.晚期或转移性癌症患者的生存护理:MASCC-ASCO 标准和实践建议。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Apr 29;32(5):313. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08465-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Planning and Reporting Effective Web-Based RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Panels: Literature Review and Preliminary Recommendations.规划和报告有效的基于网络的 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法小组:文献回顾和初步建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 26;24(8):e33898. doi: 10.2196/33898.
2
Voicing their choices: Advance care planning with adolescents and young adults with cancer and other serious conditions.表达他们的选择:为癌症和其他严重疾病的青少年和年轻成人进行预先医疗护理计划。
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Aug;20(4):462-470. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521001462.
3
Adolescent and Young Adult Initiated Discussions of Advance Care Planning: Family Member, Friend and Health Care Provider Perspectives.青少年和青年发起的预先护理计划讨论:家庭成员、朋友和医疗保健提供者的观点。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 8;13:871042. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871042. eCollection 2022.
4
An Adaptation of the RAND/UCLA Modified Delphi Panel Method in the Time of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间对兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校改良德尔菲专家小组法的一种改编
J Healthc Leadersh. 2022 May 20;14:63-70. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S352500. eCollection 2022.
5
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
6
Refining Patient-Centered Measures of End-of-Life Care Quality for Children With Cancer.优化儿童癌症患者临终关怀质量的以患者为中心的衡量标准。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Mar;18(3):e372-e382. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00447. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
7
Patient, Family, and Clinician Perspectives on End-of-Life Care Quality Domains and Candidate Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.患者、家庭和临床医生对癌症青少年和年轻成人生命末期护理质量领域和候选指标的观点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121888. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21888.
8
Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness.医疗保健研究中的德尔菲法:如何确定其适用性。
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
9
Quality measures for end-of-life care for children with cancer: A modified Delphi approach.癌症儿童临终关怀质量评估:改良 Delphi 法。
Cancer. 2021 Jul 15;127(14):2571-2578. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33546. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
10
High Intensity of End-of-Life Care Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients in the New York State Medicaid Program.纽约州医疗补助计划中青少年和青年癌症患者的临终关怀高强度情况。
Med Care. 2015 Dec;53(12):1018-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000437.

晚期癌症青少年和青年患者质量指标:患者、家庭成员和临床医生参与的改良 Delphi 流程。

Quality Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Modified Delphi Process With Patients, Family Members, and Clinicians.

机构信息

Division of Population Sciences (JWM, LF, AK), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.; Department of Pediatric Oncology (JWM, AL, CBW), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S..

Division of Population Sciences (JWM, LF, AK), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jul;66(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.005
PMID:36933749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10330073/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Quality measures have been devised for end-of-life care of older adults with cancer, but are lacking for adolescents and young adults (AYAs).

OBJECTIVE

We previously conducted interviews with AYAs, family caregivers, and clinicians to identify priority domains for high quality care of AYAs with advanced cancer. The goal of this study was to use a modified Delphi process to form consensus around the highest priority quality indicators.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process was conducted with 10 AYAs with recurrent or metastatic cancer, 11 family caregivers, and 29 multidisciplinary clinicians, using small group web conferences. Participants were asked to rate the importance of each of 41 potential quality indicators, rank the 10 most important, and engage in discussion to reconcile differences.

RESULTS

Of 41 initial indicators, 34 were rated as highly important (rating seven, eight, or nine on a nine-point scale) by >70% of participants. The panel was unable to reach consensus around the 10 most important indicators. Instead, participants recommended retaining a larger set of indicators to reflect potential for different priorities across the population, resulting in a final set of 32 indicators. Recommended indicators broadly encompassed attention to physical symptoms; quality of life; psychosocial, and spiritual care; communication and decision-making; relationships with clinicians; care and treatment; and independence.

CONCLUSION

A patient- and family-centered process for quality indicator development led to strong endorsement of multiple potential indicators by Delphi participants. Further validation and refinement will be performed using a survey of bereaved family members.

摘要

背景

已经为老年癌症患者制定了临终关怀质量措施,但缺乏青少年和年轻成人(AYA)的相关措施。

目的

我们之前对 AYA、家庭照顾者和临床医生进行了访谈,以确定为晚期癌症 AYA 提供高质量护理的优先领域。本研究的目的是使用改良 Delphi 流程,就最高优先级的质量指标达成共识。

方法

采用改良 Delphi 流程,对 10 名患有复发性或转移性癌症的 AYA、11 名家庭照顾者和 29 名多学科临床医生进行了研究,使用小型小组网络会议。参与者被要求对 41 个潜在质量指标中的每一个进行重要性评分,对 10 个最重要的指标进行排名,并进行讨论以解决分歧。

结果

在最初的 41 个指标中,有 34 个指标得到了 70%以上参与者的高度评价(评分在 9 分制中为 7、8 或 9 分)。专家组未能就 10 个最重要的指标达成共识。相反,参与者建议保留更多的指标,以反映人群中不同的优先事项,最终确定了 32 个指标。建议的指标广泛涵盖了对身体症状的关注;生活质量;心理社会和精神关怀;沟通和决策;与临床医生的关系;护理和治疗;以及独立性。

结论

以患者和家庭为中心的质量指标制定过程得到了 Delphi 参与者对多个潜在指标的强烈支持。将通过对丧亲家庭成员的调查进一步验证和完善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f6/10330073/b69df3522a08/nihms-1886352-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f6/10330073/b69df3522a08/nihms-1886352-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f6/10330073/b69df3522a08/nihms-1886352-f0001.jpg