Suprathel® 或 Mepilex® Ag 治疗儿童部分厚度烧伤：病例对照研究。
Suprathel® or Mepilex® Ag for treatment of partial thickness burns in children: A case control study.
机构信息
Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burns, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burns, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
出版信息
Burns. 2023 Nov;49(7):1585-1591. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
AIM
The study aim was to investigate if Suprathel® can be an adequate alternative to Mepilex® Ag for the treatment of partial-thickness scalds in children.
METHODS
A retrospective study including 58 children admitted to The Burn Centre in Linköping, Sweden between year 2015 and 2022. Of the 58 children, 30 were dressed with Suprathel ® and 28 with Mepilex ® Ag. Outcomes investigated were healing time, burn wound infection (BWI), need for operations and number of dressing changes.
RESULTS
We found no significant differences in any of the outcomes. In the Suprathel ® group 17 children and in the Mepilex ® Ag group 15 children were healed within 14 days. Ten children from each group received antibiotics for suspected BWI and two from each group underwent an operation with skin grafting. Each group had on median four dressing changes.
CONCLUSIONS
Two different treatments were compared for children with partial-thickness scalds, and the data indicates that similar results are received with both dressings.
目的
本研究旨在探讨 Suprathel®是否可以替代 Mepilex®Ag 用于治疗儿童部分厚度烫伤。
方法
这是一项回顾性研究，纳入了 2015 年至 2022 年期间在瑞典林雪平烧伤中心就诊的 58 名儿童。其中 30 名患儿使用 Suprathel ® ，28 名患儿使用 Mepilex ® Ag 。研究的结局包括愈合时间、烧伤创面感染（BWI）、手术需要和换药次数。
结果
我们发现两组在任何结局指标上均无显著差异。Suprathel ® 组 17 名患儿和 Mepilex ® Ag 组 15 名患儿在 14 天内愈合。两组各有 10 名患儿因疑似 BWI 接受了抗生素治疗，两组各有 2 名患儿接受了植皮手术。两组患儿的平均换药次数均为 4 次。
结论
本研究比较了两种不同的治疗方法用于治疗儿童部分厚度烫伤，数据表明两种敷料的治疗效果相似。
Zotero 插件