Grodwohl Jean-Baptiste, Parker Geoff A
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Laboratoire SPHERE, UMR7219, University of Paris Cité, Paris 75 013, France.
Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210493. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0493. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
Though the first attempts to introduce game theory into evolutionary biology failed, new formalism by Maynard Smith and Price in 1973 had almost instant success. We use information supplied by early workers to analyse how and why evolutionary game theory (EGT) spread so rapidly in its earliest years. EGT was a major tool for the rapidly expanding discipline of behavioural ecology in the 1970s; each catalysed the other. The first models were applied to animal contests, and early workers sought to improve their biological reality to compare predictions with observations. Furthermore, it was quickly realized that EGT provided a general evolutionary modelling method; not only was it swiftly applied to diverse phenotypic adaptations in evolutionary biology, it also attracted researchers from other disciplines such as mathematics and economics, for which game theory was first devised. Lastly, we pay attention to exchanges with population geneticists, considering tensions between the two modelling methods, as well as efforts to bring them closer. This article is part of the theme issue 'Half a century of evolutionary games: a synthesis of theory, application and future directions'.
尽管最初将博弈论引入进化生物学的尝试失败了,但1973年梅纳德·史密斯和普莱斯提出的新形式主义几乎立刻取得了成功。我们利用早期研究者提供的信息来分析进化博弈论(EGT)在其最初几年迅速传播的方式和原因。EGT是20世纪70年代迅速发展的行为生态学学科的主要工具;二者相互促进。最初的模型应用于动物竞争,早期研究者试图提高其生物学真实性,以便将预测结果与观察结果进行比较。此外,人们很快意识到EGT提供了一种通用的进化建模方法;它不仅迅速应用于进化生物学中各种表型适应,还吸引了来自数学和经济学等其他学科的研究人员,而博弈论最初就是为这些学科设计的。最后,我们关注与群体遗传学家的交流,考虑两种建模方法之间的矛盾,以及使它们更紧密结合的努力。本文是主题为“进化博弈的半个世纪:理论、应用与未来方向的综合”这一特刊的一部分。