Department of Anesthesia, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt.
Department of Anesthesia, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2023 May;70(5):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2022.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of midazolam and ketamine as adjuvants to the peribulbar block in vitreoretinal surgeries.
This randomized controlled trial included 93 adult patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgeries performed with peribulbar anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to 3 groups (31 participants each): control (standard anaesthetic mixture), midazolam (standard mixture + midazolam), and ketamine (standard mixture + ketamine). The primary outcomes were onset of globe akinesia and duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes were duration of motor blockade, onset of corneal anaesthesia and lid akinesia, and changes in vital data (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and pulse rate).
The ketamine group vs. the control and midazolam groups showed the most rapid onset of lid and globe akinesia (p < 0.001) and corneal anaesthesia (0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 and 1.2 ± 0.4, respectively; p < 0.001) and the longest duration of both analgesia (3.7 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4 and 3.1 ± 0.6, respectively; p < 0.001) and akinesia (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.4, and 3.7 ± 0.5, respectively; p < 0.001). The midazolam group showed better outcomes than controls, but the drug was less effective than ketamine. There were no significant differences in vital data among groups (p > 0.05).
Ketamine is an effective adjuvant for peribulbar blockade. It enhances both motor and sensory blockade by hastening onset and prolonging duration. These effects are desirable in lengthier ophthalmic procedures such as vitreoretinal surgeries. The effects of ketamine were superior to those of midazolam.
本研究旨在评估咪达唑仑和氯胺酮作为球周阻滞辅助药物在玻璃体视网膜手术中的安全性和疗效。
这是一项随机对照试验,纳入了 93 名接受球周麻醉下玻璃体视网膜手术的成年患者。患者被随机分为 3 组(每组 31 名患者):对照组(标准麻醉混合物)、咪达唑仑组(标准混合物+咪达唑仑)和氯胺酮组(标准混合物+氯胺酮)。主要结局是眼球运动障碍的开始时间和镇痛持续时间。次要结局是运动阻滞的持续时间、角膜麻醉和眼睑运动障碍的开始时间,以及生命数据(血压、血氧饱和度和脉搏率)的变化。
与对照组和咪达唑仑组相比,氯胺酮组的眼睑和眼球运动障碍(p < 0.001)以及角膜麻醉(0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 和 1.2 ± 0.4,分别;p < 0.001)的出现更快,镇痛(3.7 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4 和 3.1 ± 0.6,分别;p < 0.001)和运动障碍(3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.4 和 3.7 ± 0.5,分别;p < 0.001)的持续时间也更长。咪达唑仑组的结果优于对照组,但药物的效果不如氯胺酮。各组的生命数据无显著差异(p > 0.05)。
氯胺酮是球周阻滞的有效辅助药物。它通过加快起效和延长持续时间来增强运动和感觉阻滞。这些作用在玻璃体视网膜手术等时间较长的眼科手术中是理想的。氯胺酮的作用优于咪达唑仑。