• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯胺酮与咪达唑仑作为玻璃体视网膜手术中经单一鼻下注射行球周阻滞的辅助用药的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Ketamine versus midazolam as an adjuvant to peribulbar block using a single inferonasal injection in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt.

Department of Anesthesia, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt.

出版信息

Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2023 May;70(5):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2022.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.redare.2022.03.003
PMID:36934847
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of midazolam and ketamine as adjuvants to the peribulbar block in vitreoretinal surgeries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled trial included 93 adult patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgeries performed with peribulbar anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to 3 groups (31 participants each): control (standard anaesthetic mixture), midazolam (standard mixture + midazolam), and ketamine (standard mixture + ketamine). The primary outcomes were onset of globe akinesia and duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes were duration of motor blockade, onset of corneal anaesthesia and lid akinesia, and changes in vital data (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and pulse rate).

RESULTS

The ketamine group vs. the control and midazolam groups showed the most rapid onset of lid and globe akinesia (p < 0.001) and corneal anaesthesia (0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 and 1.2 ± 0.4, respectively; p < 0.001) and the longest duration of both analgesia (3.7 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4 and 3.1 ± 0.6, respectively; p < 0.001) and akinesia (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.4, and 3.7 ± 0.5, respectively; p < 0.001). The midazolam group showed better outcomes than controls, but the drug was less effective than ketamine. There were no significant differences in vital data among groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine is an effective adjuvant for peribulbar blockade. It enhances both motor and sensory blockade by hastening onset and prolonging duration. These effects are desirable in lengthier ophthalmic procedures such as vitreoretinal surgeries. The effects of ketamine were superior to those of midazolam.

摘要

简介和目的

本研究旨在评估咪达唑仑和氯胺酮作为球周阻滞辅助药物在玻璃体视网膜手术中的安全性和疗效。

患者和方法

这是一项随机对照试验,纳入了 93 名接受球周麻醉下玻璃体视网膜手术的成年患者。患者被随机分为 3 组(每组 31 名患者):对照组(标准麻醉混合物)、咪达唑仑组(标准混合物+咪达唑仑)和氯胺酮组(标准混合物+氯胺酮)。主要结局是眼球运动障碍的开始时间和镇痛持续时间。次要结局是运动阻滞的持续时间、角膜麻醉和眼睑运动障碍的开始时间,以及生命数据(血压、血氧饱和度和脉搏率)的变化。

结果

与对照组和咪达唑仑组相比,氯胺酮组的眼睑和眼球运动障碍(p < 0.001)以及角膜麻醉(0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 和 1.2 ± 0.4,分别;p < 0.001)的出现更快,镇痛(3.7 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4 和 3.1 ± 0.6,分别;p < 0.001)和运动障碍(3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.4 和 3.7 ± 0.5,分别;p < 0.001)的持续时间也更长。咪达唑仑组的结果优于对照组,但药物的效果不如氯胺酮。各组的生命数据无显著差异(p > 0.05)。

结论

氯胺酮是球周阻滞的有效辅助药物。它通过加快起效和延长持续时间来增强运动和感觉阻滞。这些作用在玻璃体视网膜手术等时间较长的眼科手术中是理想的。氯胺酮的作用优于咪达唑仑。

相似文献

1
Ketamine versus midazolam as an adjuvant to peribulbar block using a single inferonasal injection in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.氯胺酮与咪达唑仑作为玻璃体视网膜手术中经单一鼻下注射行球周阻滞的辅助用药的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2023 May;70(5):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2022.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Ketamine versus magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in the peribulbar block for posterior segment surgeries: a randomized controlled study.氯胺酮与硫酸镁作为球后阻滞局部麻醉药的辅助药物用于后节手术的随机对照研究。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;88(1-2):32-41. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15730-X. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
3
Efficacy of midazolam addition to local anesthetic in peribulbar block : Randomized controlled trial.咪达唑仑添加至局部麻醉药用于球周阻滞的疗效:随机对照试验。
Anaesthesist. 2019 Mar;68(3):143-151. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0525-3. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
Dexamethasone Compared to Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetic Mixture in Peribulbar Block for Vitreoretinal Surgery. A Prospective Randomized Study.地塞米松与右美托咪定作为局部麻醉混合剂辅助用于玻璃体视网膜手术球周阻滞的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):359-365. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_224_17.
5
A prospective comparison of the efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine vs 0.75% ropivacaine in peribulbar anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery.前瞻性比较 0.5%布比卡因与 0.75%罗哌卡因用于玻璃体视网膜手术球周麻醉的效果。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;68(1):153-156. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_239_19.
6
[Peribulbar anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia with facial nerve block. Techniques, local anesthetics and additives, akinesia and sensory block, complications].[球周麻醉与球后麻醉联合面神经阻滞。技术、局部麻醉药及添加剂、运动阻滞和感觉阻滞、并发症]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 Feb;204(2):75-89. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035503.
7
Local anesthetic agents for vitreoretinal surgery: no advantage to mixing solutions.用于玻璃体视网膜手术的局部麻醉剂:混合溶液没有优势。
Ophthalmology. 2015 May;122(5):1030-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.026. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
8
A prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study of ropivacaine 0.75% versus bupivacaine 0.5%-mepivacaine 2% for peribulbar anesthesia.一项关于0.75%罗哌卡因与0.5%布比卡因-2%甲哌卡因用于球周麻醉的前瞻性随机双盲对照研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 Mar-Apr;25(2):195-200. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2000.0250195.
9
Effect of addition of magnesium to local anesthetics for peribulbar block: A prospective randomized double-blind study.球周阻滞局部麻醉剂中添加镁的效果:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):64-7. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.169478.
10
Peribulbar anaesthesia using a combination of lidocaine, bupivocaine and clonidine in vitreoretinal surgery.在玻璃体视网膜手术中使用利多卡因、布比卡因和可乐定联合进行球周麻醉。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;50(3):205-8.