Department of Neurosurgery, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, IDIPHISA, Manuel de Falla 1, 28222, Majadahonda-Madrid, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Arzobispo Morcillo 4, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 20;23(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04158-8.
To compare the academic achievement obtained in Neurosurgery in a class of undergraduate students according to the pedagogical methodology employed: flipped classroom (FC) versus traditional lecture. Students' satisfaction with the FC model is also analyzed.
A quasi-experimental study was designed. The traditional lecture was the pedagogical method employed in teaching units (TUs) 1, 2, and 3 (61, 60, and 66 enrolled students, respectively), whereas TU 4 (69 enrolled students) used the FC methodology.
The dropout rate was lower, whereas the academic achievement and the rate of correct answers were higher in TU 4 compared to the rest of the TUs, but these results were not statistically significant. However, the mean score obtained in Neurosurgery was significantly higher in TU 4 compared to the rest of the TUs (p = 0.042). Active learning activities based on clinical cases were positively emphasized. The main weakness was with the time consumed for video-recorded lecture viewing.
The FC approach showed better academic results than traditional lectures when comparing students in the same Medical School during the same academic year undergoing the same exam. The students rated the FC approach positively, considering it stimulating and useful for learning.
比较神经外科学本科生采用翻转课堂(FC)与传统讲授法(TL)两种教学方法所取得的学业成绩,并分析学生对 FC 模式的满意度。
设计了一项准实验研究。在第 1、2 和 3 个教学单元(TU)中采用 TL 作为教学方法(分别有 61、60 和 66 名学生),而 TU4(有 69 名学生)采用 FC 方法。
与其他 TU 相比,TU4 的辍学率较低,学业成绩和正确答案率较高,但这些结果无统计学意义。然而,TU4 的神经外科学平均成绩明显高于其他 TU(p=0.042)。基于临床病例的主动学习活动得到了积极的强调。主要的弱点是观看录制的视频讲座所消耗的时间。
在同一医学院、同一学年、接受相同考试的学生中,FC 方法比传统讲授法的学业成绩更好。学生对 FC 方法的评价是积极的,认为它对学习有激励作用且有用。