Mulu Moses Mutua, Nyoni Champion N
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
BMC Nurs. 2023 Mar 20;22(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01235-7.
The lack of standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing programmes hampers the evaluation of e-learning programmes in low- and middle-income countries. Fragmented approaches to evaluation coupled with a lack of uniform criteria have been a major deterrent to the growth of e-learning. Adopting standards from high-income countries has contextual challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Holistic approaches coupled with uniform standards provide information to stakeholders hence the quality of the programmes is measurable. The e-learning situation in low-and middle-income countries provided an impetus to develop and validate these standards.
A modified Delphi technique.
Fourteen experts with experience and expertise in e-learning and regulation of undergraduate nursing from fourteen countries from LMICs participated in three rounds of the modified Delphi process. A pre-described set of standards was shared electronically for independent and blinded ratings. An 80% threshold was set for consensus decisions. The standards were modified based on experts' comments, and two subsequent rounds were used to refine the standards and criteria.
At the end of round one, the expert consensus was to keep 67, modify 39 and remove three criteria. At the end of the second round, the consensus was to modify 38 and remove one criteria. In the third round, experts agreed that the standards were feasible, usable, and practical in LMICs. A total of six broad standards with 104 criteria were developed.
The Technological bloom permeating all spheres of society, including education is an essential component in the development of e-learning programmes. E-learning in nursing education requires critical evaluation to ensure quality in undergraduate nursing programmes. The intricacies of the Low and middle-income context were taken into consideration in developing the standards to offer sustainable evaluation of the quality of e-learning in LMICs, and local solutions to local problems.
缺乏本科护理专业课程质量评估标准阻碍了低收入和中等收入国家电子学习项目的评估。评估方法零散且缺乏统一标准一直是电子学习发展的主要障碍。在低收入和中等收入国家采用高收入国家的标准存在背景挑战。全面的方法加上统一的标准能为利益相关者提供信息,从而使项目质量可衡量。低收入和中等收入国家的电子学习状况推动了这些标准的制定和验证。
改良德尔菲法。
来自低收入和中等收入国家14个国家的14位在电子学习和本科护理监管方面有经验和专业知识的专家参与了三轮改良德尔菲过程。通过电子方式共享一组预先描述的标准,用于独立和盲评。设定80%的阈值作为达成共识的决定标准。根据专家意见对标准进行修改,并通过随后两轮来完善标准和准则。
在第一轮结束时,专家们的共识是保留67条、修改39条并删除3条准则。在第二轮结束时,共识是修改38条并删除1条准则。在第三轮中,专家们一致认为这些标准在低收入和中等收入国家是可行、可用且实用的。共制定了6项广泛的标准,包含104条准则。
技术蓬勃发展渗透到包括教育在内的社会各个领域,是电子学习项目发展的重要组成部分。护理教育中的电子学习需要进行严格评估,以确保本科护理专业课程的质量。在制定标准时考虑到了低收入和中等收入环境的复杂性,以便对低收入和中等收入国家电子学习的质量进行可持续评估,并为当地问题提供本地化解决方案。