• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学教育中在线学习评估指南:定性反思分析。

A guide for evaluation of online learning in medical education: a qualitative reflective analysis.

机构信息

Medical Education Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02752-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-021-02752-2
PMID:34112155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8190722/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the strike of Covid-19, an unprecedented rapid shift to remote learning happened worldwide with a paradigm shift to online learning from an institutional adjuvant luxury package and learner choice into a forced solo choice. This raises the question of quality assurance. While some groups have already established standards for online courses, teaching and programs yet very little information is included on methodology of their development and very little emphasis is placed on the online learning experience. Nevertheless, no work has been done specifically for medical education institutions.

AIM

To develop a set of descriptors for best practice in online learning in medical education utilizing existing expertise and needs.

METHODS

This work utilizes a qualitative multistage approach to identify the descriptors of best practice in online learning starting with a question guided focus group, thematic analysis, Delphi technique and an expert consensus session done simultaneously for triangulation. This was done involving 32 institution in 19 countries.

RESULTS

This materialized into the development of a set of standards, indicators, and development of a checklist for each standard area. The standard areas identified were organizational capacity, educational effectiveness, and human resources each of which listed a number of standards. Expert consensus sessions identified the need for qualification of data and thus the development of indicators for best practice.

CONCLUSION

Standards are needed for online learning experience and their development and redesign is situational and needs to be enhanced methodologically in axes that are pertaining to the needs of the education community. Taking such axes into consideration by educators and institutions will lead to planning and implementing successful online learning activities, while taking them into consideration by the evaluators will help them conduct comprehensive audits and provide stakeholders with highly informative evaluation reports.

摘要

背景

随着新冠疫情的爆发,全球范围内前所未有地迅速转向远程学习,将在线学习从机构辅助的奢侈品和学习者选择转变为强制性的个人选择,这引发了质量保证的问题。虽然一些团体已经为在线课程、教学和项目制定了标准,但很少有信息涉及它们的开发方法,也很少强调在线学习体验。然而,针对医学教育机构,还没有专门的工作。

目的

利用现有专业知识和需求,为医学教育中的在线学习制定最佳实践的一套描述符。

方法

这项工作采用定性多阶段方法,从问题导向的焦点小组开始,进行主题分析、德尔菲技术和专家共识会议,同时进行三角剖分,以确定在线学习最佳实践的描述符。这项工作涉及 19 个国家的 32 个机构。

结果

这导致制定了一套标准、指标,并为每个标准领域制定了检查表。确定的标准领域包括组织能力、教育效果和人力资源,每个领域都列出了一些标准。专家共识会议确定了对数据进行资格认证的必要性,因此为最佳实践制定了指标。

结论

在线学习体验需要标准,其开发和重新设计具有情境性,并且需要在与教育界需求相关的轴向上进行方法学增强。教育工作者和机构考虑这些轴将有助于规划和实施成功的在线学习活动,而评估者考虑这些轴将有助于他们进行全面的审计,并为利益相关者提供信息丰富的评估报告。

相似文献

1
A guide for evaluation of online learning in medical education: a qualitative reflective analysis.医学教育中在线学习评估指南:定性反思分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02752-2.
2
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
5
Learning how to conduct medical interviews online for the first time - this is what we learned in Frankfurt am Main.第一次学习如何在线进行医学访谈——这就是我们在美因河畔法兰克福学到的东西。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jan 28;38(1):Doc19. doi: 10.3205/zma001415. eCollection 2021.
6
Online learning developments in undergraduate medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 69.在线学习在本科医学教育中的发展,以应对 COVID-19 大流行:BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 69 号。
Med Teach. 2022 Feb;44(2):109-129. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1992373. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students' perspectives.沙特阿拉伯在 COVID-19 大流行期间突然转向同步在线学习:一项探索医学生观点的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 28;20(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02208-z.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
The development of a reporting form for peer observation of online learning courses: An e-Delphi consensus study of educators working in health professions education.在线学习课程同行观察报告表的开发:一项针对卫生专业教育工作者的电子德尔菲共识研究。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2023 Nov;27(4):1088-1097. doi: 10.1111/eje.12902. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
10
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-rated benefits and knowledge gain from e-learning: the longitudinal use of an online learning experience at an international medical school.电子学习的自评益处与知识收获:一所国际医学院校在线学习体验的纵向应用
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06794-8.
2
Nursing Students' Experiences and Challenges in Their Education During COVID 19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.新冠疫情期间护理专业学生在其教育过程中的经历与挑战:一项混合方法研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Aug 21;10:23779608241272484. doi: 10.1177/23779608241272484. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Global prevalence of anxiety and depression among medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新冠疫情期间医学生焦虑和抑郁的全球患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jun 10;12(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01838-y.
4
Need assessment of medical school curriculum for MOOCs: perspectives of instructors and students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.慕课视角下的医学院校课程需求评估:来自设拉子医科大学教师和学生的观点。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05102-0.
5
Standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi study.中低收入国家本科护理电子学习项目质量评估标准:一项改良德尔菲研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Mar 20;22(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01235-7.
6
Undergraduate e-learning programmes in health professions: An integrative review of evaluation standards in low- and middle-income countries.本科健康专业电子学习课程:在低收入和中等收入国家的评价标准的综合评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 13;18(2):e0281586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281586. eCollection 2023.
7
Lessons learned from a pandemic: implications for a combined exercise and educational programme for medical students.从大流行中吸取的教训:对医学生综合运动和教育计划的启示。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 8;22(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03290-1.
8
Online medical education in Egypt during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide assessment of medical students' usage and perceptions.埃及 COVID-19 大流行期间的在线医学教育:对医学生使用和看法的全国评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03249-2.
9
A guide to best practice in faculty development for health professions schools: a qualitative analysis.医学专业院校教师发展最佳实践指南:定性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 5;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03208-x.
10
Challenges and Innovations Brought about by the COVID-19 Pandemic Regarding Medical and Pharmacy Education Especially in Africa and Implications for the Future.新冠疫情给医学和药学教育带来的挑战与创新,尤其在非洲地区,以及对未来的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 13;9(12):1722. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121722.

本文引用的文献

1
Step-by-step Guide to Create Competency-Based Assignments as an Alternative for Traditional Summative Assessment.创建基于能力的作业作为传统总结性评估替代方案的分步指南。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Jun 8;9:120. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000120.1. eCollection 2020.
2
Using Appreciative Inquiry to explore the effect of COVID-19 on student trust: medical students' perspective.运用欣赏式探询法探究新冠疫情对学生信任的影响:医学生视角
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Sep 23;9:285. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000285.2. eCollection 2020.
3
Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情封锁期间高等教育中的线上教学
Int J Educ Res Open. 2020;1:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Model for utilizing distance learning post COVID-19 using (PACT)™ a cross sectional qualitative study.新冠疫情后利用远程学习模型(PACT)™的横断面定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 2;20(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02311-1.
5
A toolbox for conducting an online OSCE.一个用于开展在线客观结构化临床考试的工具箱。
Clin Teach. 2021 Jun;18(3):236-242. doi: 10.1111/tct.13285. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
6
Medical Education Adaptations Post COVID-19: An Egyptian Reflection.COVID-19 后的医学教育适应:埃及的思考
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Aug 27;7:2382120520951819. doi: 10.1177/2382120520951819. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
7
COVID-19 Pandemic-Medical Education Adaptations: the Power of Students, Staff and Technology.新冠疫情下的医学教育适应:学生、教职员工与技术的力量
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Jul 29;30(4):1355-1356. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01038-4. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
COVID-19 and medical education.2019冠状病毒病与医学教育。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):777-778. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30226-7. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
9
Multilevel analysis of individual, household, and community factors influencing child growth in Nepal.多层面分析尼泊尔影响儿童生长的个体、家庭和社区因素。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1469-8.
10
Expert consensus on the use of intracoronary imaging to guide PCI: increasing reliance by demonstrating relevance.冠状动脉内成像指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的专家共识:通过证明相关性提高依赖程度。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Aug 20;14(6):613-615. doi: 10.4244/EIJV14I6A108.