• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合并症指数预测心脏移植术后死亡率的能力:丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数、查尔森合并症指数和埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数的验证

The Ability of Comorbidity Indices to Predict Mortality After Heart Transplantation: A Validation of the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.

作者信息

Bonnesen Kasper, Mols Rikke E, Løgstrup Brian, Gustafsson Finn, Eiskjær Hans, Schmidt Morten

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Transplant Direct. 2023 Mar 15;9(4):e1438. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001438. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001438
PMID:36935871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10019203/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Advanced heart failure patients often have comorbidities of prognostic importance. However, whether total pretransplantation comorbidity burden predicts mortality in patients treated with heart transplantation (HTx) is unknown. We used population-based hospital and prescription data to examine the ability of the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI), DANCAMI restricted to noncardiovascular diseases, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index to predict 30-d, 1-y, 5-y, and 10-y all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after HTx.

METHODS

We identified all adult Danish patients with incident HTx from the Scandiatransplant Database between March 1, 1995, and December 31, 2018 (n = 563). We calculated Harrell's C-Statistics to examine discriminatory performance.

RESULTS

The C-Statistic for predicting 1-y all-cause mortality after HTx was 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.65) for a baseline model including age and sex. Adding comorbidity score to the baseline model did not increase the C-Statistics for DANCAMI (0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.65), DANCAMI restricted to noncardiovascular diseases (0.57; 95% CI, 0.50-0.64), Charlson Comorbidity Index (0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.66), or Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (0.58; 95% CI, 0.51-0.65). The results for 30-d, 5-y, and 10-y all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

After accounting for patient age and sex, none of the commonly used comorbidity indices added predictive value to short- or long-term all-cause or cardiovascular mortality after HTx.

摘要

未标注

晚期心力衰竭患者常伴有具有预后重要性的合并症。然而,移植前合并症的总体负担是否能预测接受心脏移植(HTx)治疗患者的死亡率尚不清楚。我们使用基于人群的医院和处方数据,来检验丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数(DANCAMI)、仅限于非心血管疾病的DANCAMI、查尔森合并症指数以及埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数预测HTx后30天、1年、5年和10年全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的能力。

方法

我们从Scandiatransplant数据库中识别出1995年3月1日至2018年12月31日期间所有接受HTx的丹麦成年患者(n = 563)。我们计算了哈雷尔C统计量以检验判别性能。

结果

对于包含年龄和性别的基线模型,预测HTx后1年全因死亡率的C统计量为0.58(95%置信区间[CI],0.50 - 0.65)。将合并症评分添加到基线模型中,对于DANCAMI(0.58;95% CI,0.50 - 0.65)、仅限于非心血管疾病的DANCAMI(0.57;95% CI,0.50 - 0.64)、查尔森合并症指数(0.59;95% CI,0.51 - 0.66)或埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数(0.58;95% CI,0.51 - 0.65),C统计量均未增加。30天、5年和10年全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的结果一致。

结论

在考虑患者年龄和性别后,常用的合并症指数均未增加HTx后短期或长期全因死亡率或心血管死亡率的预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/10019203/54505c897ebd/txd-9-e1438-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/10019203/54505c897ebd/txd-9-e1438-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/10019203/54505c897ebd/txd-9-e1438-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Ability of Comorbidity Indices to Predict Mortality After Heart Transplantation: A Validation of the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.合并症指数预测心脏移植术后死亡率的能力:丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数、查尔森合并症指数和埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数的验证
Transplant Direct. 2023 Mar 15;9(4):e1438. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001438. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
The DANish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI): Development, Validation and Comparison with Existing Comorbidity Indices.丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数(DANCAMI):开发、验证及与现有合并症指数的比较
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov 20;12:1299-1311. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S277325. eCollection 2020.
3
Validation of the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction for predicting one-year mortality in patients with venous thromboembolism.验证丹麦合并症指数用于预测静脉血栓栓塞症患者一年内的死亡率。
Thromb Res. 2022 Apr;212:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
Ability of the DANCAMI to predict the risk ischemic stroke and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter.DANCAMI 预测房颤/房扑患者缺血性卒中风险和死亡的能力。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023 Aug;32(8):107219. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107219. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Potential of the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction to discriminate mortality in patients with infective endocarditis.丹麦合并症指数对感染性心内膜炎患者死亡率的预测能力。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Oct 1;412:132328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132328. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
6
Prediction Ability of Charlson, Elixhauser, and Rx-Risk Comorbidity Indices for Mortality in Patients with Hip Fracture. A Danish Population-Based Cohort Study from 2014 - 2018.Charlson指数、Elixhauser指数和Rx-Risk共病指数对髋部骨折患者死亡率的预测能力。一项基于丹麦人群的2014 - 2018年队列研究。
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 8;14:275-287. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S346745. eCollection 2022.
7
The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index is a better predictor of survival in operated lung cancer patients than the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices.年龄调整 Charlson 共病指数是预测手术肺癌患者生存的更好指标,优于 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 共病指数。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jan 1;53(1):235-240. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx215.
8
Development and validation of a comorbidity scoring system for patients with cirrhosis.肝硬化患者合并症评分系统的开发和验证。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Jan;146(1):147-56; quiz e15-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.09.019. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery.在预测骨科手术后的住院患者死亡情况方面,埃利克斯豪泽共病法比查尔森指数表现更优。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Sep;472(9):2878-86. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3686-7. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
A disease-specific comorbidity index for predicting mortality in patients admitted to hospital with a cardiac condition.用于预测因心脏疾病住院患者死亡率的疾病特异性合并症指数。
CMAJ. 2019 Mar 18;191(11):E299-E307. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181186.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing major comorbidity indices as predictors of all-cause mortality in the Veterans Affairs health care system.比较主要共病指数作为退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中全因死亡率预测指标的情况。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jun;182:111778. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111778. Epub 2025 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction for predicting one-year mortality in patients with venous thromboembolism.验证丹麦合并症指数用于预测静脉血栓栓塞症患者一年内的死亡率。
Thromb Res. 2022 Apr;212:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
2
The DANish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI): Development, Validation and Comparison with Existing Comorbidity Indices.丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数(DANCAMI):开发、验证及与现有合并症指数的比较
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov 20;12:1299-1311. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S277325. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparing the Performance of Charlson and Elixhauser Comorbidity Indices to Predict In-Hospital Mortality Among a Chinese Population.
比较Charlson和Elixhauser合并症指数在中国人群中预测住院死亡率的表现。
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 18;12:307-316. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S241610. eCollection 2020.
4
The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index: A significant predictor of clinical outcome in patients with heart failure.年龄校正的查尔森合并症指数:心力衰竭患者临床结局的重要预测指标。
Eur J Intern Med. 2020 Mar;73:103-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.12.030. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Developing an adapted Charlson comorbidity index for ischemic stroke outcome studies.制定适合缺血性脑卒中结局研究的改良 Charlson 共病指数。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):930. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4720-y.
6
Risk prediction models for survival after heart transplantation: A systematic review.心脏移植术后生存风险预测模型:一项系统综述。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Apr;20(4):1137-1151. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15708. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Validity of ICD-10 diagnoses of overweight and obesity in Danish hospitals.丹麦医院中ICD - 10对超重和肥胖诊断的有效性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep 11;11:845-854. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S214909. eCollection 2019.
8
The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records.丹麦医疗保健系统与流行病学研究:从医疗保健接触到数据库记录。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. eCollection 2019.
9
Association of Short-Term Mortality of Venous Thromboembolism with Family History of Venous Thromboembolism and Charlson Comorbidity Index.静脉血栓栓塞症短期死亡率与静脉血栓栓塞症家族史和 Charlson 合并症指数的关系。
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Jan;119(1):48-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676347. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
10
Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study.丹麦国家患者登记处心血管疾病诊断的阳性预测值:一项验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 18;6(11):e012832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012832.