Healey E C, Howe S W
Barkley Center, Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0731.
J Commun Disord. 1987 Dec;20(6):493-506. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(87)90036-0.
The purpose of this study was to compare adult stutterers' and adult nonstutterers' fluent speech patterns produced during one nonshadowed reading and two speech shadowing conditions. Subjects' speech error rates, shadowing strategies, and fluent speech segment durations were obtained during baseline, diotic speech shadowing, and dichotic speech shadowing conditions. Results indicated that stutterers produced fewer speech production errors (i.e., omissions, substitutions, and insertions) than nonstutterers during each shadowing condition. Stutterers also favored the use of a word-by-word speech shadowing strategy, while nonstutterers utilized both word-by-word and small phrase shadowing strategies. Finally, stutterers exhibited significantly longer vowel and phrase durations than nonstutterers during the shadowing conditions.
本研究的目的是比较成年口吃者和成年非口吃者在一次无跟读阅读以及两种言语跟读条件下产生的流畅言语模式。在基线、双耳言语跟读和双耳分听言语跟读条件下,获取了受试者的言语错误率、跟读策略和流畅言语片段时长。结果表明,在每种跟读条件下,口吃者产生的言语产出错误(即遗漏、替换和插入)比非口吃者少。口吃者也更倾向于使用逐字言语跟读策略,而非口吃者则同时使用逐字和小短语跟读策略。最后,在跟读条件下,口吃者的元音和短语时长显著长于非口吃者。