Ullman Jacqueline, Hobby Lucy, Magson Natasha R, Zhong Hua Flora
Centre for Educational Research, School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Centre for Emotional Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1095255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095255. eCollection 2023.
Research in the field of gender and sexuality diversity and, more specifically, negative attitudes toward gender and sexuality diverse individuals, has acknowledged the relationship between individuals' endorsement of sex-differentiated, normative gender roles and their attitudes toward gender and sexuality diversity. Such work has highlighted how normative expectations of gender, drawn from binarized gender roles, sit at the heart of homophobic and transphobic attitudes. Previous research in high school settings has measured gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) students' experiences of homo/transphobic harassment as an element of 'school climate' with regard to acceptance of gender and sexuality diversity. However, to date, no research has measured GSD students' perceptions about how valued binarized, gender-normative roles are at their schools, or the ways in which these norms might impact, and potentially constrain, these students' academic and social schooling lives. The aim of the present study was to address this gap by developing and testing a new, multidimensional measure (the Gender Climate Scale; GCS) of GSD students' ideas about how gender norms function within their school. Using a convenience sample of 2,376 Australian high school students who identify as GSD, the GCS was evaluated for its reliability, construct, and criterion validity and measurement invariance using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) methods. Findings revealed that the estimates produced from the GCS were reliable, valid, and invariant across student reported gender (male/female/non-binary) and location (urban/rural). Criterion validity was supported, with GCS factors representing the promotion of traditional gender roles in the schooling environment negatively associated with perceived school belonging and inclusion and positively associated with bullying and social isolation. Future research with the GCS can inform school and curriculum policy on this important measure of school climate, not just for GSD students but for whole student cohorts.
在性别与性取向多样性领域,尤其是对性别和性取向多元个体的负面态度方面的研究,已经认识到个体对性别差异化的规范性性别角色的认同与其对性别和性取向多样性的态度之间的关系。这类研究强调了从二元化性别角色中得出的性别规范期望是恐同和恐跨态度的核心所在。此前在高中环境中的研究将性别和性取向多元(GSD)学生遭受的恐同/恐跨骚扰经历作为“学校氛围”中关于接受性别和性取向多样性的一个要素来衡量。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究衡量GSD学生对其二元化、性别规范角色在学校受到重视程度的看法,也没有研究探讨这些规范可能如何影响并潜在限制这些学生的学业和社交生活。本研究的目的是通过开发并测试一种新的、多维的测量工具(性别氛围量表;GCS)来填补这一空白,该量表用于了解GSD学生对性别规范在其学校中如何发挥作用的看法。使用了2376名自认为是GSD的澳大利亚高中生的便利样本,运用验证性因素分析(CFA)方法对GCS的信度、结构效度、效标效度和测量不变性进行了评估。研究结果显示,GCS得出的估计值在学生报告的性别(男/女/非二元性别)和地点(城市/农村)方面是可靠、有效且不变的。效标效度得到了支持,GCS中代表在学校环境中宣扬传统性别角色的因素与感知到的学校归属感和包容性呈负相关,与欺凌和社会孤立呈正相关。未来使用GCS的研究可为学校和课程政策提供有关这一重要学校氛围测量指标的信息,不仅适用于GSD学生,也适用于全体学生群体。