Yang Tingting, Kang Jian
Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1136201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136201. eCollection 2023.
Quiet areas, such as quiet communities, are encouraged to maintain a harmonious and peaceful urban living environment, and the design approach has drawn increasing attention in recent years. Related residential standards define the thresholds of quietness concerning noise pollution problems. However, the variations in height across floors of high-rise buildings and time in sound environments have not been detailed. The city of Shanghai experienced a citywide lockdown to contain the spread of COVID-19 showing the evidence of quietness with marked reductions in anthropogenic noise. Here, we conducted noise monitoring in a 14-story apartment building surrounded and shielded by other buildings in a typical urban community during and after lockdown. The mean value of the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level ( ) of all 14 floors after lockdown was higher than that during lockdown, and the differences were 3.6 and 3.1 dB during the daytime and night-time periods, respectively. The values at low heights were slightly lower than those at high heights during and after lockdown. The variations due to the different heights were not great. However, the change tendency from the ground to the top floors was similar and correlated during and after lockdown. The difference between the maximum and minimum values of the floors was 3 dB during the daytime period and 4.5 to 5.1 dB during the night-time period. The day equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level ( ) and night equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level ( ) at the middle building height increased 4.0 and 1.3 dB, respectively, after lockdown. The change tendency during a daily cycle during and after lockdown was similar and highly correlated. The differences in the frequency characteristics of noise level were larger within the 63 to 2,000 Hz range. We suggest that the building represents a typical quiet living condition in high-density habitats in China. Notably, the difference is approximately 3 to 4 dB, and the patterns of variation in height and time are similar between the absence and limited presence of anthropogenic noise. In practice, it would be useful to consider specific floor level or time of day.
鼓励建设安静区域,如安静的社区,以维护和谐宁静的城市居住环境,近年来这种设计方法受到了越来越多的关注。相关住宅标准针对噪声污染问题定义了安静阈值。然而,高层建筑各楼层高度的变化以及声音环境中的时间变化尚未详细说明。上海市为遏制新冠疫情传播实施了全市范围的封锁,显示出安静的迹象,人为噪声显著减少。在此,我们在封锁期间及之后,对一个典型城市社区中被其他建筑物包围和屏蔽的一栋14层公寓楼进行了噪声监测。封锁后所有14层的等效连续A声级( )平均值高于封锁期间,白天和夜间的差值分别为3.6 dB和3.1 dB。封锁期间及之后,低楼层的 值略低于高楼层。不同高度的变化不大。然而,从底层到顶层的变化趋势在封锁期间及之后是相似且相关的。白天各楼层最大值与最小值的差值为3 dB,夜间为4.5至5.1 dB。封锁后,建筑中间高度处的日等效连续A声级( )和夜等效连续A声级( )分别增加了4.0 dB和1.3 dB。封锁期间及之后每日周期内的 变化趋势相似且高度相关。在63至2000 Hz范围内,噪声水平的频率特性差异较大。我们认为该建筑代表了中国高密度栖息地典型的安静居住条件。值得注意的是,差异约为3至4 dB,在人为噪声不存在和存在有限的情况下,高度和时间的变化模式相似。在实际应用中,考虑特定楼层或一天中的特定时间会很有用。