• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有吸引力的“安静”庭院:城市居民对道路交通噪声反应的潜在调节剂?

Attractive "quiet" courtyards: a potential modifier of urban residents' responses to road traffic noise?

机构信息

The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Box 414, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Sep;7(9):3359-75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7093359. Epub 2010 Aug 30.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph7093359
PMID:20948929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2954550/
Abstract

The present paper explores the influence of the physical environmental qualities of "quiet". courtyards (degree of naturalness and utilization) on residents' noise responses. A questionnaire study was conducted in urban residential areas with road-traffic noise exposure between L(Aeq,24h) 58 to 68 dB at the most exposed façade. The dwellings had "quiet" indoor section/s and faced a "quiet" outdoor courtyard (L(Aeq,24h) < 48 dB façade reflex included). Data were collected from 385 residents and four groups were formed based on sound-level categories (58-62 and 63-68 dB) and classification of the "quiet" courtyards into groups with low and high physical environmental quality. At both sound-level categories, the results indicate that access to high-quality "quiet" courtyards is associated with less noise annoyance and noise-disturbed outdoor activities among the residents. Compared to low-quality "quiet" courtyards, high-quality courtyards can function as an attractive restorative environment providing residents with a positive soundscape, opportunities for rest, relaxation and play as well as social relations that potentially reduce the adverse effects of noise. However, access to quietness and a high-quality courtyard can only compensate partly for high sound levels at façades facing the streets, thus, 16% and 29% were still noise annoyed at 58-62 and 63-68 dB, respectively. Implications of the "quiet"-side concept are discussed.

摘要

本论文探讨了“安静”庭院的物理环境质量(自然度和利用率)对居民噪声响应的影响。在道路交通噪声暴露最严重的立面上,噪声级为 L(Aeq,24h)58 至 68dB 的城市住宅区进行了问卷调查研究。这些住宅有“安静”的室内部分/并面向“安静”的室外庭院(包括反射声的 L(Aeq,24h) < 48dB)。从 385 位居民中收集了数据,并根据声级类别(58-62 和 63-68dB)以及“安静”庭院的分类,将其分为低和高质量物理环境质量两组。在这两个声级类别中,结果表明,进入高质量“安静”庭院的居民受到的噪声烦恼和受噪声干扰的户外活动较少。与低质量“安静”庭院相比,高质量庭院可以作为一个有吸引力的恢复环境,为居民提供积极的声景、休息、放松和玩耍的机会以及社交关系,从而潜在地减少噪声的不利影响。然而,安静和高质量庭院的可及性只能部分补偿面向街道的立面上的高噪声水平,因此,分别有 16%和 29%的居民在 58-62 和 63-68dB 时仍感到噪声烦恼。还讨论了“安静”一侧概念的含义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1e/2954550/00b2ab45bd1e/ijerph-07-03359f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1e/2954550/b2b1b48823a7/ijerph-07-03359f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1e/2954550/beb72e3f7d87/ijerph-07-03359f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1e/2954550/00b2ab45bd1e/ijerph-07-03359f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1e/2954550/b2b1b48823a7/ijerph-07-03359f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1e/2954550/beb72e3f7d87/ijerph-07-03359f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1e/2954550/00b2ab45bd1e/ijerph-07-03359f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Attractive "quiet" courtyards: a potential modifier of urban residents' responses to road traffic noise?有吸引力的“安静”庭院:城市居民对道路交通噪声反应的潜在调节剂?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Sep;7(9):3359-75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7093359. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
2
Road traffic noise and annoyance: a quantification of the effect of quiet side exposure at dwellings.道路交通噪声和烦恼:居住环境中安静侧面暴露的影响量化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jun 3;10(6):2258-70. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10062258.
3
Urban road traffic noise and annoyance: the effect of a quiet façade.城市道路交通噪声与烦恼:安静立面的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):1936-42. doi: 10.1121/1.3621180.
4
Home as a Place of Noise Control for the Elderly? A Cross-Sectional Study on Potential Mediating Effects and Associations between Road Traffic Noise Exposure, Access to a Quiet Side, Dwelling-Related Green and Noise Annoyance.家是老年人控制噪音的地方吗?一项关于道路交通噪声暴露、安静侧可达性、与居住相关的绿地和噪声烦恼之间潜在中介效应和关联的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 21;15(5):1036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051036.
5
A descriptive cross-sectional study of annoyance from low frequency noise installations in an urban environment.一项关于城市环境中低频噪声装置所产生烦恼的描述性横断面研究。
Noise Health. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(20):35-46.
6
Quiet areas and the need for quietness in Amsterdam.阿姆斯特丹的安静区和安静需求。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Apr;9(4):1030-50. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9041030. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
7
Annoyance, sleep and concentration problems due to combined traffic noise and the benefit of quiet side.交通噪音综合导致的烦恼、睡眠及注意力问题以及安静一侧的益处。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jan 29;12(2):1612-28. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120201612.
8
Focused study on the quiet side effect in dwellings highly exposed to road traffic noise.集中研究住宅中高度暴露于道路交通噪声的安静副作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Dec;9(12):4292-310. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9124292.
9
Railway noise annoyance and the importance of number of trains, ground vibration, and building situational factors.铁路噪声烦恼以及列车数量、地面振动和建筑环境因素的重要性。
Noise Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;14(59):190-201. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.99895.
10
Annoyance due to single and combined sound exposure from railway and road traffic.铁路和道路交通单一及组合声音暴露引起的烦恼。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Nov;122(5):2642-52. doi: 10.1121/1.2785809.

引用本文的文献

1
Sleep Disturbance Caused by Step Changes in Railway Noise Exposure and Earthquakes.铁路噪声暴露和地震引起的睡眠障碍。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 16;21(6):783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060783.
2
The Sound of a Circular City: Towards a Circularity-Driven Quietness.圆形城市的声音:走向以循环性为导向的静谧。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912290.
3
Soundscape Evaluation Comparison of Outdoor Activity Space Between Gated and Open Communities.封闭式社区与开放式社区户外活动空间的声景评价比较

本文引用的文献

1
Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise.在自然声音和环境噪声下的应激恢复。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Mar;7(3):1036-46. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7031036. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
2
Risk of hypertension from exposure to road traffic noise in a population-based sample.基于人群样本的道路交通噪音暴露导致高血压的风险。
Occup Environ Med. 2009 Jun;66(6):410-5. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.042804. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
3
Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: updated review and synthesis of epidemiological studies indicate that the evidence has increased.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 15;12:707477. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707477. eCollection 2021.
4
Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on noise pollution levels in an Indian city: a case study of Kanpur.新冠疫情封锁对印度一座城市噪声污染水平的影响:以坎普尔为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(33):46007-46019. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13872-z. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
Room Acoustical Parameters as Predictors of Acoustic Comfort in Outdoor Spaces of Housing Complexes.作为住宅小区户外空间声学舒适度预测指标的室内声学参数
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 4;11:344. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00344. eCollection 2020.
6
Home as a Place of Noise Control for the Elderly? A Cross-Sectional Study on Potential Mediating Effects and Associations between Road Traffic Noise Exposure, Access to a Quiet Side, Dwelling-Related Green and Noise Annoyance.家是老年人控制噪音的地方吗?一项关于道路交通噪声暴露、安静侧可达性、与居住相关的绿地和噪声烦恼之间潜在中介效应和关联的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 21;15(5):1036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051036.
7
WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review of Transport Noise Interventions and Their Impacts on Health.世界卫生组织欧洲区域环境噪声指南:交通噪声干预措施及其对健康影响的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 3;14(8):873. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080873.
8
Assessment of spatial and physical neighborhood characteristics that influence sound quality and herewith well-being and health.评估影响声音质量以及幸福感和健康的空间和物理邻里特征。
Noise Health. 2017 May-Jun;19(88):154-164. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_53_16.
9
Cognitive-Motivational Determinants of Residents' Civic Engagement and Health (Inequities) in the Context of Noise Action Planning: A Conceptual Model.噪声行动计划背景下居民公民参与和健康(不平等问题)的认知-动机决定因素:一个概念模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May 30;14(6):578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060578.
10
The ecological context of soundscapes for children's blood pressure.儿童血压的声音景观的生态背景。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):773-81. doi: 10.1121/1.4807808.
交通噪音与心血管风险:流行病学研究的最新综述与综合分析表明,相关证据有所增加。
Noise Health. 2006 Jan-Mar;8(30):1-29. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.32464.
4
Road traffic noise and hypertension.道路交通噪音与高血压
Occup Environ Med. 2007 Feb;64(2):122-6. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.025866. Epub 2006 Oct 19.
5
Noise annoyance and activity disturbance before and after the erection of a roadside noise barrier.路边隔音屏障安装前后的噪声烦恼与活动干扰
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Apr;119(4):2178-88. doi: 10.1121/1.2169906.
6
Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction.交通噪音与心肌梗死风险
Epidemiology. 2005 Jan;16(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000147104.84424.24.
7
Longitudinal surveys on effects of changes in road traffic noise-annoyance, activity disturbances, and psycho-social well-being.关于道路交通噪音变化对烦恼程度、活动干扰及心理社会幸福感影响的纵向调查。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Feb;115(2):719-29. doi: 10.1121/1.1639333.
8
Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health.噪音污染:对健康的非听觉影响。
Br Med Bull. 2003;68:243-57. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg033.
9
The built environment and mental health.建筑环境与心理健康。
J Urban Health. 2003 Dec;80(4):536-55. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg063.
10
The Meaning of Annoyance in Relation to the Quality of Acoustic Environments.烦恼与声学环境质量的关系
Noise Health. 2002;4(15):13-18.