Anguera M Teresa, Jonsson Gudberg K, Escolano-Pérez Elena, Sánchez-Lopez Carmen Rosa, Losada José Luis, Portell Mariona
Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Human Behavior Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 1;14:1085980. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1085980. eCollection 2023.
Scientific literature contains mainly systematic reviews focused on substantial aspects, but there are also approaches that have combined both substantial and methodological aspects, which is our preferred option since it undeniably adds value. The aims of this study were: (1) to carry out a systematic review of the literatura on T-Pattern analysis (TPA), and (2) to explore the possible contribution of mixed methods research to the integration of qualitative and quantitative elements on a synthesis level.
Based on PRISMA guidelines, searches were carried out in the Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases. The general search syntax was: "THEME" AND ("T-Patterns" OR "T Patterns") carried out in title, keywords and abstract. In addition, we included empirical articles on THEME and T-Patterns collected in other sources based on citations in several empirical works and consultations with different authors. This selection process resulted in 125 primary documents making up this systematic review.
The results showed that the detection of structures in behavior patterns forms a nexus between studies carried out in very diverse fields and contexts. Most studies are observational, whilst the applicability and power of T-Pattern detection are extraordinary. It allows the researcher to go deeper in a robust analysis that responds to the integration of qualitative and quantitative elements which constitutes the leit motive of mixed methods; and also to discover the deep, hidden structure that underlies the respective databases, regardless of the methodology used in each study. The possibilities in assigning parameters notably increase the options for obtaining results and their interpretation.
It is relevant the extraordinary strength and applicability of T-pattern detection. There is a high presence of T-pattern detection and analysis in studies using observational methodology. It is necessary commit to consolidating the methodological analysis of selected works, as taking individual and collective responsibility for improving methodological quality of TPA studies, taking advantage of the resources provided by the THEME program.
科学文献主要包含侧重于实质方面的系统评价,但也有将实质和方法学方面结合起来的方法,这是我们的首选,因为它无疑能增加价值。本研究的目的是:(1)对关于T模式分析(TPA)的文献进行系统评价,以及(2)探讨混合方法研究在综合层面上对定性和定量元素整合的可能贡献。
根据PRISMA指南,在Scopus、PsycINFO和科学网数据库中进行检索。一般检索语法为:在标题、关键词和摘要中检索“主题” AND (“T模式” OR “T Patterns”)。此外,我们还纳入了基于若干实证研究中的引用以及与不同作者的咨询从其他来源收集的关于主题和T模式的实证文章。这一筛选过程产生了构成该系统评价的125篇原始文献。
结果表明,行为模式中结构的检测在非常不同的领域和背景下开展的研究之间形成了一个联系点。大多数研究是观察性的,而T模式检测的适用性和效力非常突出。它使研究人员能够更深入地进行有力分析,这种分析回应了构成混合方法主旨的定性和定量元素的整合;并且还能发现各个数据库背后深层的、隐藏的结构,无论每项研究中使用的方法如何。分配参数的可能性显著增加了获得结果及其解释的选项。
T模式检测的非凡强度和适用性很重要。在使用观察性方法的研究中,T模式检测和分析的出现频率很高。有必要致力于巩固所选作品的方法学分析,通过利用主题计划提供的资源,为提高TPA研究的方法学质量承担个人和集体责任。