Arias-Pujol Eulàlia, Anguera M Teresa
FPCEE Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 11;11:1922. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01922. eCollection 2020.
Conducted within a mixed methods framework, this study focuses on the conversation-facilitation role of a lead therapist during group psychotherapy with adolescents. Conversation is an essential component of psychoanalytic psychotherapies and there is growing interest in describing and studying the impact of conversational techniques. One way to do this is to report on specific approaches, such as questioning, paraphrasing, and mentalization in intervention turns and to analyze their impact on the therapist-patient relationship. The main aim of this study was to investigate differences in communication strategies used by a lead therapist in the early and late stages of therapy with six adolescents aged 13-15 years. We employed a mixed methods design based on systematic direct observation supplemented by indirect observation. The observational methodology design was nomothetic, follow-up, and multidimensional. The choice of methodology is justified by our use of an observation instrument for communication strategies combining a field format and a category system. We analyzed interobserver agreement quantitatively by Cohen's kappa using GSEQ5 software. Following confirmation of the reliability of the data, we analyzed the lead therapist's conversation-facilitation techniques in sessions 5 and 29 of a 30-session program by quantitatively analyzing what were initially qualitative data using T-pattern detection (THEME v.6 Edu software), lag sequential analysis (GSEQ5 software), and polar coordinate analysis (HOISAN v. 1.6.3.3.6. software and R software). The results show changes in the techniques used from the start to the end of therapy. Of the 28 communication strategies analyzed, three were particularly common: questioning and paraphrasing in session 5 and questioning and mentalization in session 29. This mixed methods study shows that combined use of T-pattern detection, lag sequential analysis, and polar coordinate analysis can offer meaningful and objective insights into group psychotherapy through the lens of the therapist.
本研究在混合方法框架内进行,聚焦于在青少年团体心理治疗中主导治疗师促进对话的角色。对话是精神分析心理治疗的重要组成部分,人们对描述和研究对话技巧的影响兴趣日增。一种方法是报告具体方法,如在干预轮次中的提问、释义和心理化,并分析它们对治疗师 - 患者关系的影响。本研究的主要目的是调查一位主导治疗师在对6名13 - 15岁青少年进行治疗的早期和后期所使用的沟通策略的差异。我们采用了基于系统直接观察并辅以间接观察的混合方法设计。观察方法设计是通则性、随访性和多维度的。我们使用一种结合了现场格式和类别系统的沟通策略观察工具来证明方法选择的合理性。我们使用GSEQ5软件通过科恩kappa系数对观察者间一致性进行定量分析。在确认数据的可靠性之后,我们通过使用T模式检测(THEME v.6 Edu软件)、滞后序列分析(GSEQ5软件)和极坐标分析(HOISAN v. 1.6.3.3.6.软件和R软件)对最初的定性数据进行定量分析,来分析在一个30节疗程项目的第5节和第29节中主导治疗师的对话促进技巧。结果显示从治疗开始到结束所使用的技巧发生了变化。在分析的28种沟通策略中,有三种特别常见:第5节中的提问和释义以及第29节中的提问和心理化。这项混合方法研究表明,结合使用T模式检测、滞后序列分析和极坐标分析能够从治疗师的视角为团体心理治疗提供有意义且客观的见解。