• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于战术训练任务中的团队建设的干预计划,以改善团队功能。

An intervention program based on team building during tactical training tasks to improve team functioning.

作者信息

Tassi Juan M, López-Gajardo Miguel A, Leo Francisco M, Díaz-García Jesús, García-Calvo Tomás

机构信息

Análisis Comportamental de la Actividad Física y el Deporte (ACAFYDE), Departamento de Didáctica de la Expresión Musical, Plástica y Corporal, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, Av. de la Universidad, s/n, Cáceres, Spain.

Análisis Comportamental de la Actividad Física y el Deporte (ACAFYDE), Departamento de Didáctica de la Expresión Musical, Plástica y Corporal, Facultad de Formación del Profesorado, Universidad de Extremadura, Av. de la Universidad, s/n, Cáceres, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1065323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065323. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065323
PMID:36935995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10018022/
Abstract

The study aimed to analyze the effects of an intervention program based on team building developed in technical-tactical training tasks in football. Specifically, it examined the benefits of the intervention in variables related to the conceptual model of team building: role clarity, team identification, intra-team communication, cohesion, intra-group conflict, commitment to the team, inside sacrifice, transactive memory systems, collective efficacy, and perceived performance. The participants were 51 young elite footballers divided into an experimental group ( = 27) and a control group ( = 24). The methodological design was quasi-experimental with a duration of 8 weeks. The data were collected three times: pretest, posttest, and follow-up. The results showed differences favoring the experimental group compared to the control group after the implementation of the intervention program in the following variables: team identification ( < 0.001), role clarity ( < 0.001), intra-team communication ( < 0.001; except distinctiveness), group cohesion ( < 0.05), social conflict ( = 0.001), commitment to the team ( < 0.001), inside sacrifice ( < 0.001), transactive memory systems ( < 0.01; except coordination), collective efficacy ( = 0.02) and team performance ( = 0.001). Consequently, the application of team-building strategies incorporated into specific technical-tactical training tasks in football seems to improve group dynamics in sports teams.

摘要

该研究旨在分析一项基于团队建设的干预计划在足球技战术训练任务中的效果。具体而言,它考察了该干预在与团队建设概念模型相关变量方面的益处:角色清晰度、团队认同感、团队内部沟通、凝聚力、团队内部冲突、对团队的承诺、内部牺牲、交互记忆系统、集体效能感和感知表现。参与者为51名年轻的精英足球运动员,分为实验组(n = 27)和对照组(n = 24)。方法设计为准实验性,为期8周。数据收集了三次:前测、后测和随访。结果显示,在实施干预计划后,与对照组相比,实验组在以下变量上存在优势:团队认同感(p < 0.001)、角色清晰度(p < 0.001)、团队内部沟通(p < 0.001;独特性除外)、团队凝聚力(p < 0.05)、社会冲突(p = 0.001)、对团队的承诺(p < 0.001)、内部牺牲(p < 0.001)、交互记忆系统(p < 0.01;协调性除外)、集体效能感(p = 0.02)和团队表现(p = 0.001)。因此,将团队建设策略应用于足球特定的技战术训练任务中似乎可以改善运动队的团队动态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7882/10018022/c285697cd4a0/fpsyg-14-1065323-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7882/10018022/c285697cd4a0/fpsyg-14-1065323-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7882/10018022/c285697cd4a0/fpsyg-14-1065323-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
An intervention program based on team building during tactical training tasks to improve team functioning.一项基于战术训练任务中的团队建设的干预计划,以改善团队功能。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1065323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065323. eCollection 2023.
2
The relationship among intra-group communication, transactive memory systems, collective efficacy and team performance: A structural equation model analysis with Elite Footballers.群体内沟通、交互记忆系统、集体效能与团队绩效的关系:基于精英足球运动员的结构方程模型分析
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Apr;23(4):599-606. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2049373. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
3
Using the Conceptual Framework for Examining Sport Teams to Understand Group Dynamics in Professional Soccer.运用考察运动团队的概念框架理解职业足球中的团队动态。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 27;19(23):15782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315782.
4
Analyzing the impact of team-building interventions on team cohesion in sports teams: a meta-analysis study.分析团队建设干预措施对运动队团队凝聚力的影响:一项元分析研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 15;15:1353944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353944. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of Small-Sided Game Interventions on the Technical Execution and Tactical Behaviors of Young and Youth Team Sports Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.小型比赛干预对青少年团队运动运动员技术执行和战术行为的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2021 May 7;12:667041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667041. eCollection 2021.
6
A Preliminary Study of the Effects of a Comprehensive Teaching Program, Based on Questioning, to Improve Tactical Actions in Young Footballers.一项基于提问的综合教学计划对提高青少年足球运动员战术行动效果的初步研究。
Percept Mot Skills. 2016 Jun;122(3):742-56. doi: 10.1177/0031512516649716. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Team Building Through Team Video Games: Randomized Controlled Trial.通过团队电子游戏进行团队建设:随机对照试验
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Dec 14;9(4):e28896. doi: 10.2196/28896.
8
When team member familiarity affects transactive memory and skills: a simulation-based training among police teams.团队成员熟悉程度如何影响交互记忆和技能:警察团队的模拟训练
Ergonomics. 2018 Dec;61(12):1591-1600. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1510547. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
Reference values for collective tactical behaviours based on positional data in professional football matches: a systematic review.基于职业足球比赛位置数据的集体战术行为参考值:一项系统综述
Biol Sport. 2022 Jan;39(1):110-114. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.102921. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
10
Exploring the Effects of Playing Formations on Tactical Behavior and External Workload During Football Small-Sided Games.探究足球小场比赛中不同比赛阵型对战术行为和外部体力负荷的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jul;34(7):2024-2030. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002445.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing the impact of team-building interventions on team cohesion in sports teams: a meta-analysis study.分析团队建设干预措施对运动队团队凝聚力的影响:一项元分析研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 15;15:1353944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353944. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Teams Whose Players Are More Committed To the Team More Resilient? the Role of Intra-Group Conflict.球员对团队更忠诚的球队是否更具韧性?群体内部冲突的作用。
J Hum Kinet. 2022 Feb 10;81:233-242. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0018. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
The relationship among intra-group communication, transactive memory systems, collective efficacy and team performance: A structural equation model analysis with Elite Footballers.群体内沟通、交互记忆系统、集体效能与团队绩效的关系:基于精英足球运动员的结构方程模型分析
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Apr;23(4):599-606. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2049373. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
3
Is Perceived Athlete Leadership Quality Related to Inside Sacrifice and Perceived Performance in Team Sports? The Mediating Role of Team Identification.
团队运动中运动员领导力感知质量与内在牺牲及表现感知相关吗?团队认同的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 21;12:662250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662250. eCollection 2021.
4
How many leaders does it take to lead a sports team? The relationship between the number of leaders and the effectiveness of professional sports teams.需要多少领导者才能领导一个运动队?领导者人数与职业运动队效率之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0218167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218167. eCollection 2019.
5
Adaptation and validation in Spanish of the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) with professional football players.针对职业足球运动员的《团队环境问卷》(GEQ)西班牙语版本的改编与验证。
Psicothema. 2015;27(3):261-8. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.247.
6
Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport.凝聚力、团队心智模型与集体效能感:构建一个体育团队动态的综合框架
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(6):641-53. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.957714. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
7
Is team confidence the key to success? The reciprocal relation between collective efficacy, team outcome confidence, and perceptions of team performance during soccer games.团队信心是成功的关键吗?足球比赛期间集体效能、团队结果信心与团队表现认知之间的相互关系。
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(3):219-31. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.942689. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
8
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness.共享领导与团队效能的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):181-98. doi: 10.1037/a0034531. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
9
The assessment of commitment: advantages of a unidimensional, target-free approach.承诺评估:采用非多维、无目标方法的优势。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):222-38. doi: 10.1037/a0034751. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
10
A season-long team-building intervention: examining the effect of team goal setting on cohesion.一项为期一个赛季的团队建设干预措施:考察团队目标设定对凝聚力的影响。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008 Apr;30(2):186-99. doi: 10.1123/jsep.30.2.186.