Kim Jaeho, Choe Yeong Sim, Park Yuhyun, Kim Yeshin, Kim Jun Pyo, Jang Hyemin, Kim Hee Jin, Na Duk L, Cho Soo-Jin, Moon Seung Hwan, Seo Sang Won
Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Mar 2;15:1124445. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1124445. eCollection 2023.
Although the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) method is objective and simple, cut-off optimization using global SUVR values may not reflect focal increased uptake in the cerebrum. The present study investigated clinical and neuroimaging characteristics according to focally increased β-amyloid (Aβ) uptake and global Aβ status.
We recruited 968 participants with cognitive continuum. All participants underwent neuropsychological tests and 498 F-florbetaben (FBB) amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and 470 F-flutemetamol (FMM) PET. Each PET scan was assessed in 10 regions (left and right frontal, lateral temporal, parietal, cingulate, and striatum) with focal-quantitative SUVR-based cutoff values for each region by using an iterative outlier approach.
A total of 62 (6.4%) subjects showed increased focal Aβ uptake with subthreshold global Aβ status [global (-) and focal (+) Aβ group, G(-)F(+) group]. The G(-)F(+) group showed worse performance in memory impairment ( < 0.001), global cognition ( = 0.009), greater hippocampal atrophy ( = 0.045), compared to those in the G(-)F(-). Participants with widespread Aβ involvement in the whole region [G(+)] showed worse neuropsychological ( < 0.001) and neuroimaging features ( < 0.001) than those with focal Aβ involvement G(-)F(+).
Our findings suggest that individuals show distinctive clinical outcomes according to focally increased Aβ uptake and global Aβ status. Thus, researchers and clinicians should pay more attention to focal increased Aβ uptake in addition to global Aβ status.
尽管标准化摄取值比率(SUVR)方法客观且简单,但使用整体SUVR值进行截断值优化可能无法反映大脑中局灶性摄取增加的情况。本研究根据局灶性β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)摄取增加和整体Aβ状态,调查了临床和神经影像学特征。
我们招募了968名具有认知连续性的参与者。所有参与者均接受了神经心理学测试,498人进行了F-氟比他班(FBB)淀粉样蛋白正电子发射断层扫描(PET),470人进行了F-氟代甲磺酸美他莫(FMM)PET。通过迭代异常值方法,对每个PET扫描在10个区域(左右额叶、外侧颞叶、顶叶、扣带回和纹状体)进行评估,每个区域基于局灶定量SUVR设定截断值。
共有62名(6.4%)受试者表现出局灶性Aβ摄取增加且整体Aβ状态低于阈值[整体(-)且局灶(+)Aβ组,G(-)F(+)组]。与G(-)F(-)组相比,G(-)F(+)组在记忆障碍(<0.001)、整体认知(=0.009)方面表现更差,海马萎缩更严重(=0.045)。与局灶性Aβ受累的G(-)F(+)组相比,整个区域广泛Aβ受累[G(+)]的参与者表现出更差的神经心理学(<0.001)和神经影像学特征(<0.001)。
我们的研究结果表明,个体根据局灶性Aβ摄取增加和整体Aβ状态表现出不同的临床结果。因此,研究人员和临床医生除了关注整体Aβ状态外,还应更加关注局灶性Aβ摄取增加的情况。