• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估支持英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)关于在临床实践中改变人们生活方式建议的证据:横断面调查。

Evaluation of evidence supporting NICE recommendations to change people's lifestyle in clinical practice: cross sectional survey.

作者信息

Albarqouni Loai, Ringsten Martin, Montori Victor, Jørgensen Karsten Juhl, Bulbeck Helen, Johansson Minna

机构信息

Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Med. 2022 Sep 13;1(1):e000130. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000130. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000130
PMID:36936567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9978760/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether recommendations of individually oriented lifestyle interventions (IOLIs) in guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) were underpinned by evidence of benefit, and whether harms and opportunity costs were considered.

DESIGN

Cross sectional survey.

SETTING

UK.

DATA SOURCES

NICE guidelines and supporting evidence.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All NICE pathways for IOLI recommendations (ie, non-drug interventions that healthcare professionals administer to adults to achieve a healthier lifestyle and improve health) were searched systematically on 26 August 2020. One author screened all retrieved pathways for candidate guidelines, while a second author verified these judgments. Two authors independently and in duplicate screened all retrieved guidelines and recommendations for eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated the evidence cited and the outcomes considered. Disagreements were noted and resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Within 57 guidelines, 379 NICE recommendations were found for IOLIs; almost all (n=374; 99%) recommended the lifestyle intervention and five (1%) recommended against the intervention. Of the 379 recommendations, 13 (3%) were supported by moderate or high certainty evidence of a beneficial effect on patient relevant outcomes (n=7; 2%) or surrogate outcomes (n=13; 3%). 19 (5%) interventions considered psychosocial harms, 32 (8%) considered physical harms, and one (<1%) considered the opportunity costs of implementation. No intervention considered the burden placed on individuals by these recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Few NICE recommendations of lifestyle interventions are supported by reliable evidence. While this finding does not contest the beneficial effects of healthy habits, guidelines recommending clinicians to try to change people's lifestyle need to be reconsidered given the substantial uncertainty about the effectiveness, harms, and opportunity costs of such interventions.

摘要

目的

评估英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南中针对个体的生活方式干预(IOLIs)建议是否有获益证据支持,以及是否考虑了危害和机会成本。

设计

横断面调查。

地点

英国。

数据来源

NICE指南及支持证据。

纳入标准

2020年8月26日系统检索了所有关于IOLIs建议的NICE路径(即医疗保健专业人员为成年人实施的非药物干预措施,以实现更健康的生活方式并改善健康状况)。一位作者筛选所有检索到的路径以寻找候选指南,另一位作者核实这些判断。两位作者独立且重复筛选所有检索到的指南和建议以确定其是否符合纳入标准,提取数据,并评估所引用的证据和所考虑的结果。记录分歧并通过共识解决。

结果

在57项指南中,发现了379项针对IOLIs的NICE建议;几乎所有建议(n = 374;99%)都推荐生活方式干预,5项(1%)建议不进行该干预。在379项建议中,13项(3%)有中度或高度确定性证据支持对患者相关结局(n = 7;2%)或替代结局(n = 13;3%)有有益影响。19项(5%)干预措施考虑了心理社会危害,32项(8%)考虑了身体危害,1项(<1%)考虑了实施的机会成本。没有干预措施考虑这些建议给个人带来的负担。

结论

NICE关于生活方式干预的建议很少有可靠证据支持。虽然这一发现并不质疑健康习惯的有益影响,但鉴于此类干预措施在有效性、危害和机会成本方面存在很大不确定性,建议临床医生试图改变人们生活方式的指南需要重新考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c5/9978760/dda8bb0aefb9/bmjmed-2022-000130f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c5/9978760/dda8bb0aefb9/bmjmed-2022-000130f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c5/9978760/dda8bb0aefb9/bmjmed-2022-000130f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of evidence supporting NICE recommendations to change people's lifestyle in clinical practice: cross sectional survey.评估支持英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)关于在临床实践中改变人们生活方式建议的证据:横断面调查。
BMJ Med. 2022 Sep 13;1(1):e000130. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000130. eCollection 2022.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.纸质形式的人工生成提醒:对专业实践和患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 18;12(12):CD001174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001174.pub4.
6
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Interventions in outside-school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4 to 12 years.校外儿童保育环境中促进 4 至 12 岁学童身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;9(9):CD013380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013380.pub2.
9
Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.患者介导的干预措施以改善专业实践。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 11;9(9):CD012472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2.
10
Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health.减少环境细颗粒物空气污染的干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;5(5):CD010919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010919.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Seven ways to optimise prevention in general practice and family medicine - a EUROPREV position paper to spark debate on prevention.优化全科医疗和家庭医学预防工作的七种方法——一份引发预防问题辩论的欧洲预防医学立场文件
Eur J Gen Pract. 2025 Dec;31(1):2531880. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2531880. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Promoting lifestyle change through text messages to patients with hypertension: A randomized controlled trial in Swedish primary care.通过短信促进高血压患者的生活方式改变:瑞典初级保健中的一项随机对照试验。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Feb 17;51:103009. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103009. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Optimal lifestyle patterns for delaying ageing and reducing all-cause mortality: insights from the UK Biobank.

本文引用的文献

1
Lifestyle Medicine.生活方式医学。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020 Nov;31(4):515-526. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Resisting Moralisation in Health Promotion.抵制健康促进中的道德化
Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2018;21(4):997-1011. doi: 10.1007/s10677-018-9941-3. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
3
Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review.公共卫生干预措施的投资回报:系统评价。
延缓衰老和降低全因死亡率的最佳生活方式模式:来自英国生物银行的见解。
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2024 Oct 5;21(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s11556-024-00362-7.
4
Pediatric obesity is a complex disease. It is time we start reimbursing for care.小儿肥胖是一种复杂的疾病。是时候开始为相关治疗提供报销了。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Jul;96(1):7-9. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03201-8. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Lifestyle changes in middle age and risk of cancer: evidence from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.中年生活方式的改变与癌症风险:欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查的证据。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;39(2):147-159. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01059-4. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
6
Evidence and opportunity costs of lifestyle interventions in clinical medicine.临床医学中生活方式干预的证据及机会成本
BMJ Med. 2022 Sep 13;1(1):e000336. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000336. eCollection 2022.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug;71(8):827-834. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208141. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
4
Financial incentives for a healthy life style and disease prevention among older people: a systematic literature review.老年人健康生活方式和疾病预防的经济激励措施:一项系统的文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 5;16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):426. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1517-0.
5
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.GRADE证据到决策(EtD)框架:一种做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。1:引言。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 28;353:i2016. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2016.
6
WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide.世卫组织欧洲健康决定因素和卫生鸿沟审查。
Lancet. 2012 Sep 15;380(9846):1011-29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61228-8. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
7
Effectiveness of providing financial incentives to healthcare professionals for smoking cessation activities: systematic review.提供经济激励措施以鼓励医疗保健专业人员参与戒烟活动的效果:系统评价。
Tob Control. 2013 Jan;22(1):3-8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050048. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
8
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness.GRADE 指南:8. 评价证据质量——间接性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
9
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南:1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
10
Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children.技能培养与对弱势儿童投资的经济学
Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1900-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1128898.