Ezzat Mai Adnan, Albassam Ebtsam Mohmmed, Aldajani Eman Abdullah, Alaskar Raneem Abdulaziz, Devol Edward Bentz
Department of Nutrition, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2022 Dec;9(4):216-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2022.12.003. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
Early identification of childhood malnutrition is imperative to improve overall health outcomes, and more importantly, to start early intervention to decrease the risk of future complications. This study aimed to evaluate new malnutrition Z-score growth indicators for detecting pediatric malnutrition and degrees of severity and compare their accuracy with that of growth chart centiles.
This retrospective study included 475 pediatric patients from several pediatric nutrition clinics for six months. The participant's weight, height, age, and growth parameters were recorded using both traditional growth charts (centiles) and updated malnutrition indicators (z-scores). The percentage and degree of malnutrition using centiles and Z-scores were compared.
In children aged <2 years, the percentage of malnutrition was 4.7% higher when measured using new malnutrition indicators (weight-for-length Z-score) compared with (weight-for-length centiles). Our results also showed 9.6% higher number of malnourished children >2 years of age when BMI-for-age Z-score was used compared to weight-for-height centiles while there were 15.8% higher malnourished children when BMI-for-age Z-score was compared to BMI-for-age centiles for the same group. We found a significant difference (X = 202.548, =<.0001) between the degree of malnutrition in children aged >2 years using BMI-for-age Z-score (normal vs. malnourished) and the degree of malnutrition using BMI centiles (normal vs. malnourished). Approximately 34% of the children classified as normal using centiles were classified as malnourished using Z-scores. Comparing the degrees of Malnutrition, approximately 23% (45 of 196) of children classified as normal based on centiles were classified as having mild malnutrition when Z-scores were used, and 42% (80 of 192) of children who were classified as having mild malnutrition based on centiles were classified as having moderate malnutrition when Z-scores were used.
In our study, a higher percentage of children showed malnutrition when assessed using the Z-score (BMI-for-age for children >2 years/weight-for-length for children <2 years of age) than the centiles growth chart.
早期识别儿童营养不良对于改善整体健康状况至关重要,更重要的是,要尽早开始干预以降低未来并发症的风险。本研究旨在评估用于检测儿童营养不良及其严重程度的新的营养不良Z评分生长指标,并将其准确性与生长图表百分位数进行比较。
这项回顾性研究纳入了来自多家儿科营养诊所的475名儿科患者,为期六个月。使用传统生长图表(百分位数)和更新的营养不良指标(Z评分)记录参与者的体重、身高、年龄和生长参数。比较了使用百分位数和Z评分得出的营养不良百分比和程度。
在2岁以下儿童中,使用新的营养不良指标(身长别体重Z评分)测量时,营养不良的百分比比使用(身长别体重百分位数)时高4.7%。我们的结果还显示,与身高别体重百分位数相比,使用年龄别BMI Z评分时,2岁以上营养不良儿童的数量高出9.6%,而在同组中,与年龄别BMI百分位数相比,使用年龄别BMI Z评分时,营养不良儿童的数量高出15.8%。我们发现,使用年龄别BMI Z评分(正常与营养不良)评估的2岁以上儿童的营养不良程度与使用BMI百分位数(正常与营养不良)评估的程度之间存在显著差异(X = 202.548,P <.0001)。使用百分位数分类为正常的儿童中,约34%使用Z评分时被分类为营养不良。比较营养不良程度,使用百分位数分类为正常的儿童中,约23%(196名中的45名)使用Z评分时被分类为轻度营养不良,而使用百分位数分类为轻度营养不良的儿童中,42%(192名中的80名)使用Z评分时被分类为中度营养不良。
在我们的研究中,使用Z评分(2岁以上儿童为年龄别BMI/2岁以下儿童为身长别体重)评估时,显示营养不良的儿童百分比高于百分位数生长图表。