• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对自动驾驶系统的预期恐惧和焦虑:在一项全国代表性调查中估算其患病率。

Anticipated fear and anxiety of Automated Driving Systems: Estimating the prevalence in a national representative survey.

作者信息

Meinlschmidt Gunther, Stalujanis Esther, Grisar Laura, Borrmann Moritz, Tegethoff Marion

机构信息

Division of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, International Psychoanalytic University, Stromstrasse 3b, D-10555, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):100371. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100371. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100371
PMID:36937334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10018559/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Automated Driving Systems (ADS) may reshape mobility. Yet, related fear and anxiety are largely unknown. We estimated the prevalence and risk factors of anticipated anxiety towards ADS.

METHOD

In a nationally representative face-to-face household survey, we assessed anticipated levels of anxiety towards ADS based on DSM-5 specific phobia criteria, using structured diagnostic interviews. We estimated weighted prevalences and conducted adjusted logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of   2076 respondents, 40.82% (95%-confidence interval (CI) 37.73-43.98) anticipated experiencing some symptoms of phobia of ADS, 15.22% (CI 13.19-17.51) anticipated subthreshold phobia, and 3.39% (CI 2.42-4.75) anticipated full-blown phobia of ADS. Of subjects anticipating subthreshold phobia, 74.02% showed no strong, enduring fears of driving non-automated cars and 65.07% presented no other specific phobias (full-blown anticipated phobia: 50.37% and 50.03%, respectively). Anticipated phobia highly overlapped with anticipating marked or strong fears of passively encountering ADS in traffic (odds ratio 312.4-1982.2).

CONCLUSION

About 20% of subjects anticipated at least subthreshold and 4% of subjects anticipated full-blown phobia of ADS. It appears to be distinct from fears related to non-automated driving and other specific phobias. Our findings call for prevention and treatment of phobia of ADS as they become increasingly ubiquitous.

摘要

背景

自动驾驶系统(ADS)可能会重塑出行方式。然而,与之相关的恐惧和焦虑在很大程度上尚不为人所知。我们估计了对ADS预期焦虑的患病率及风险因素。

方法

在一项具有全国代表性的面对面家庭调查中,我们使用结构化诊断访谈,根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)特定恐惧症标准,评估了对ADS的预期焦虑水平。我们估计了加权患病率,并进行了调整后的逻辑回归模型分析。

结果

在2076名受访者中,40.82%(95%置信区间(CI)37.73 - 43.98)预计会出现一些ADS恐惧症症状,15.22%(CI 13.19 - 17.51)预计会出现阈下恐惧症,3.39%(CI 2.42 - 4.75)预计会出现全面的ADS恐惧症。在预计有阈下恐惧症的受试者中,74.02%对驾驶非自动驾驶汽车没有强烈、持久的恐惧,65.07%没有其他特定恐惧症(全面的预期恐惧症分别为50.37%和50.03%)。预期恐惧症与预期在交通中被动遇到ADS时会有明显或强烈的恐惧高度重叠(优势比312.4 - 1982.2)。

结论

约20%的受试者预计至少会出现阈下恐惧症,4%的受试者预计会出现全面的ADS恐惧症。它似乎与与非自动驾驶相关的恐惧以及其他特定恐惧症不同。随着ADS越来越普遍,我们的研究结果呼吁对ADS恐惧症进行预防和治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2815/10018559/98bd9048b5ad/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2815/10018559/98bd9048b5ad/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2815/10018559/98bd9048b5ad/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Anticipated fear and anxiety of Automated Driving Systems: Estimating the prevalence in a national representative survey.对自动驾驶系统的预期恐惧和焦虑:在一项全国代表性调查中估算其患病率。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):100371. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100371. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
The epidemiology of specific phobia and subthreshold fear subtypes in a community-based sample of older adults.特定恐惧症和亚阈值恐惧亚型在社区老年人样本中的流行病学。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Jun;28(6):456-63. doi: 10.1002/da.20812. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
3
Social fears and social phobia in the USA: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.美国的社交恐惧与社交恐惧症:全国共病调查复制研究的结果
Psychol Med. 2008 Jan;38(1):15-28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707001699. Epub 2007 Nov 2.
4
Epidemiology of fears and specific phobia in adolescence: results from the Mexican Adolescent Mental Health Survey.青少年的恐惧和特定恐惧症的流行病学:来自墨西哥青少年心理健康调查的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;73(2):152-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07442.
5
One-session treatment compared with multisession CBT in children aged 7-16 years with specific phobias: the ASPECT non-inferiority RCT.单一疗程治疗与多次认知行为疗法治疗 7-16 岁特定恐惧症儿童的比较:ASPECT 非劣效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(42):1-174. doi: 10.3310/IBCT0609.
6
Human brain evolution and the "Neuroevolutionary Time-depth Principle:" Implications for the Reclassification of fear-circuitry-related traits in DSM-V and for studying resilience to warzone-related posttraumatic stress disorder.人类大脑进化与“神经进化时间深度原则”:对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中恐惧回路相关特质重新分类以及对战区相关创伤后应激障碍恢复力研究的启示
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;30(5):827-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
7
The longitudinal study of phobic disorder in a community sample from early to late adolescence.对一个社区样本从青春期早期到晚期的恐惧症纵向研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Oct 1;10(7):483. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00117-4.
8
Prevalence of dental fear and phobia relative to other fear and phobia subtypes.相对于其他恐惧和恐惧症亚型的牙科恐惧和恐惧症患病率。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Apr;117(2):135-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00602.x.
9
Gender and age differences in the prevalence of specific fears and phobias.特定恐惧和恐惧症患病率中的性别与年龄差异。
Behav Res Ther. 1996 Jan;34(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00048-3.
10
Specific phobia among U.S. adolescents: phenomenology and typology.美国青少年特定恐惧症:现象学和类型学。
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Dec;29(12):1072-82. doi: 10.1002/da.22008. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological Barriers to Digital Living in Older Adults: Computer Anxiety as Predictive Mechanism for Technophobia.老年人数字生活的心理障碍:计算机焦虑作为技术恐惧症的预测机制。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2019 Sep 11;9(9):96. doi: 10.3390/bs9090096.
2
Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles.采用自动驾驶车辆的心理障碍。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;1(10):694-696. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0202-6.
3
Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: multiple imputation is not always the answer.在统计分析中处理缺失数据:多重插补并不总是答案。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1294-1304. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz032.
4
Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).理解和分类精神障碍的三种方法:ICD-11、DSM-5 和国家精神卫生研究所的研究领域标准 (RDoC)。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Sep;18(2):72-145. doi: 10.1177/1529100617727266.
5
The cross-national epidemiology of specific phobia in the World Mental Health Surveys.世界心理健康调查中特定恐惧症的跨国流行病学研究。
Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(10):1744-1760. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000174. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
6
Why public health should embrace the autonomous car.为何公共卫生领域应接纳自动驾驶汽车。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Feb;41(1):5-7. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12588. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
7
Twelve-month prevalence, comorbidity and correlates of mental disorders in Germany: the Mental Health Module of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1-MH).德国精神障碍的12个月患病率、合并症及相关因素:德国成人健康访谈与检查调查的心理健康模块(DEGS1-MH)
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Sep;23(3):304-19. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1439. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
8
The epidemiology of specific phobia and subthreshold fear subtypes in a community-based sample of older adults.特定恐惧症和亚阈值恐惧亚型在社区老年人样本中的流行病学。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Jun;28(6):456-63. doi: 10.1002/da.20812. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
9
The psychology of fear of flying (part I): a critical evaluation of current perspectives on the nature, prevalence and etiology of fear of flying.飞行恐惧的心理学(上):对飞行恐惧的本质、普遍性和病因的现有观点的批判性评价。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2010 Nov;8(6):327-38. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
10
Specific phobia: a review of DSM-IV specific phobia and preliminary recommendations for DSM-V.特定恐惧症:DSM-IV 特定恐惧症的综述及 DSM-V 的初步建议。
Depress Anxiety. 2010 Feb;27(2):148-67. doi: 10.1002/da.20655.