Crespin Athéna, Le Bescop Clément, de Gunzburg Jean, Vitry Fabien, Zalcman Gérard, Cervesi Julie, Bandinelli Pierre-Alain
Da Volterra, Paris, France.
Department of Thoracic Oncology and CIC1425, Institut du Cancer AP-HP, Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 2;13:1075593. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1075593. eCollection 2023.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have considerably improved patient outcomes in various cancer types, but their efficacy remains poorly predictable among patients. The intestinal microbiome, whose balance and composition can be significantly altered by antibiotic use, has recently emerged as a factor that may modulate ICI efficacy. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the impact of antibiotics on the clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with ICIs.
PubMed and major oncology conference proceedings were systematically searched to identify all studies reporting associations between antibiotic use and at least one of the following endpoints: Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Progressive Disease (PD) Rate. Pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS, and pooled Odds Ratios (ORs) for ORR and PD were calculated. Subgroup analyses on survival outcomes were also performed to investigate the potential differential effect of antibiotics according to cancer types and antibiotic exposure time windows.
107 articles reporting data for 123 independent cohorts were included, representing a total of 41,663 patients among whom 11,785 (28%) received antibiotics around ICI initiation. The pooled HRs for OS and PFS were respectively of 1.61 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.48-1.76] and 1.45 [95% CI 1.32-1.60], confirming that antibiotic use was significantly associated with shorter survival. This negative association was observed consistently across all cancer types for OS and depending on the cancer type for PFS. The loss of survival was particularly strong when antibiotics were received shortly before or after ICI initiation. The pooled ORs for ORR and PD were respectively of 0.59 [95% CI 0.47-0.76] and 1.86 [95% CI 1.41-2.46], suggesting that antibiotic use was significantly associated with worse treatment-related outcomes.
As it is not ethically feasible to conduct interventional, randomized, controlled trials in which antibiotics would be administered to cancer patients treated with ICIs to demonstrate their deleterious impact control, prospective observational studies and interventional trials involving microbiome modifiers are crucially needed to uncover the role of microbiome and improve patient outcomes. Such studies will reduce the existing publication bias by allowing analyses on more homogeneous populations, especially in terms of treatments received, which is not possible at this stage given the current state of the field. In the meantime, antibiotic prescription should be cautiously considered in cancer patients receiving ICIs.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42019145675.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)显著改善了多种癌症类型患者的预后,但在患者中其疗效仍难以预测。肠道微生物群的平衡和组成会因使用抗生素而发生显著改变,最近已成为可能调节ICI疗效的一个因素。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是研究抗生素对接受ICI治疗的癌症患者临床结局的影响。
系统检索PubMed和主要肿瘤学会议论文集,以识别所有报告抗生素使用与以下至少一个终点之间关联的研究:总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病进展(PD)率。计算OS和PFS的合并风险比(HR),以及ORR和PD的合并比值比(OR)。还对生存结局进行了亚组分析,以研究根据癌症类型和抗生素暴露时间窗,抗生素可能存在的差异效应。
纳入了107篇报告123个独立队列数据的文章,共涉及41,663例患者,其中11,785例(28%)在ICI开始使用前后接受了抗生素治疗。OS和PFS的合并HR分别为1.61 [95%置信区间(CI)1.48 - 1.76]和1.45 [95% CI 1.32 - 1.60],证实使用抗生素与较短生存期显著相关。在所有癌症类型中,OS均观察到这种负相关,PFS则因癌症类型而异。在ICI开始使用前不久或之后接受抗生素治疗时,生存期的损失尤为明显。ORR和PD的合并OR分别为0.59 [95% CI 0.47 - 0.76]和1.86 [95% CI 1.41 - 2.46],表明使用抗生素与较差的治疗相关结局显著相关。
对接受ICI治疗的癌症患者使用抗生素以证明其有害影响进行干预性、随机、对照试验在伦理上不可行,因此迫切需要开展涉及微生物群调节剂的前瞻性观察性研究和干预性试验,以揭示微生物群的作用并改善患者预后。此类研究将通过对更同质的人群进行分析来减少现有的发表偏倚,特别是在接受的治疗方面。鉴于该领域的现状,目前这是不可能的。与此同时,在接受ICI治疗的癌症患者中应谨慎考虑抗生素处方。