Furo Hiroko, Wiegand Timothy, Rani Meenakshi, Schwartz Diane G, Sullivan Ross W, Elkin Peter L
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Department of Pathology, The University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Subst Abuse. 2023 Mar 13;17:11782218231153748. doi: 10.1177/11782218231153748. eCollection 2023.
Utilizing a 1-year chart review as the data, Furo et al. conducted a research study on an association between buprenorphine dose and the urine "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratio and found significant differences in the ratio among 8-, 12-, and 16-mg/day groups with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. This study expands the data for a 2-year chart review and is intended to delineate an association between buprenorphine dose and the urine "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratio with a higher statistical power.
This study performed a 2-year chart review of data for the patients living in a halfway house setting, where their drug administration was closely monitored. The patients were on buprenorphine prescribed at an outpatient clinic for opioid use disorder (OUD), and their buprenorphine prescription and dispensing information were confirmed by the New York Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). Urine test results in the electronic health record (EHR) were reviewed, focusing on the "buprenorphine," "norbuprenorphine," and "creatinine" levels. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to examine an association between buprenorphine dose and the "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratio.
This study included 371 urine samples from 61 consecutive patients and analyzed the data in a manner similar to that described in the study by Furo et al. This study had similar findings with the following exceptions: (1) a mean buprenorphine dose of 11.0 ± 3.8 mg/day with a range of 2 to 20 mg/day; (2) exclusion of 6 urine samples with "creatinine" level <20 mg/dL; (3) minimum "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratios in the 8-, 12-, and 16-mg/day groups of 0.44 × 10 (n = 68), 0.1 × 10 (n = 133), and 1.37 × 10 (n = 82), respectively; however, after removing the 2 lowest outliers, the minimum "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratio in the 12-mg/day group was 1.6 × 10, similar to the findings in the previous study; and (4) a significant association between buprenorphine dose and the urine "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratios from the Kruskal-Wallis test ( < .01). In addition, the median "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratio had a strong association with buprenorphine dose, and this association could be formulated as: [y = 2.266 ln() + 0.8211]. In other words, the median ratios in 8-, 12-, and 16-mg/day groups were 5.53 × 10, 6.45 × 10, and 7.10 × 10, respectively. Therefore, any of the following features should alert providers to further investigate patient treatment compliance: (1) inappropriate substance(s) in urine sample; (2) "creatinine" level <20 mg/dL; (3) "buprenorphine" to "norbuprenorphine" ratio >50:1; (4) buprenorphine dose >24 mg/day; or (5) "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratios <0.5 × 10 in patients who are on 8 mg/day or <1.5 × 10 in patients who are on 12 mg/day or more.
The results of the present study confirmed those of the previous study regarding an association between buprenorphine dose and the "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratio, using an expanded data set. Additionally, this study delineated a clearer relationship, focusing on the median "norbuprenorphine" to "creatinine" ratios in different buprenorphine dose groups. These results could help providers interpret urine test results more accurately and apply them to outpatient opioid treatment programs for optimal treatment outcomes.
富罗等人以1年的病历审查作为数据,对丁丙诺啡剂量与尿液中“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”比值之间的关联进行了一项研究,通过方差分析(ANOVA)检验发现8毫克/天、12毫克/天和16毫克/天组之间的该比值存在显著差异。本研究扩展了2年病历审查的数据,旨在以更高的统计效能描绘丁丙诺啡剂量与尿液中“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”比值之间的关联。
本研究对居住在中途之家环境中的患者数据进行了为期2年的病历审查,在该环境中他们的药物服用情况受到密切监测。这些患者在门诊诊所接受用于阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)的丁丙诺啡治疗,他们的丁丙诺啡处方和配药信息由纽约处方药监测计划(PDMP)确认。审查了电子健康记录(EHR)中的尿液检测结果,重点关注“丁丙诺啡”“去甲丁丙诺啡”和“肌酐”水平。进行了Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney检验,以检验丁丙诺啡剂量与“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”比值之间的关联。
本研究纳入了61例连续患者的371份尿液样本,并以与富罗等人的研究中描述的类似方式分析数据。本研究有类似的发现,但有以下例外情况:(1)丁丙诺啡平均剂量为11.0±3.8毫克/天,范围为2至20毫克/天;(2)排除6份“肌酐”水平<20毫克/分升的尿液样本;(3)8毫克/天、12毫克/天和16毫克/天组中“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”的最低比值分别为0.44×10(n = 68)、0.1×10(n = 133)和1.37×10(n = 82);然而,在去除2个最低异常值后,12毫克/天组中“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”的最低比值为1.6×10,与先前研究的结果相似;以及(4)Kruskal-Wallis检验显示丁丙诺啡剂量与尿液中“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”比值之间存在显著关联(P <.01)。此外,“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”的中位数比值与丁丙诺啡剂量有很强关联,这种关联可以表示为:[y = 2.266 ln(x) + 0.8211]。换句话说,8毫克/天、12毫克/天和16毫克/天组中的中位数比值分别为5.53×10、6.45×10和7.10×10。因此,如果出现以下任何特征,应提醒医疗服务提供者进一步调查患者的治疗依从性:(1)尿液样本中存在不适当物质;(2)“肌酐”水平<20毫克/分升;(3)“丁丙诺啡”与“去甲丁丙诺啡”比值>50:1;(4)丁丙诺啡剂量>24毫克/天;或(5)服用8毫克/天的患者中“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”比值<0.5×10,或服用12毫克/天及以上的患者中该比值<1.5×10。
本研究结果使用扩展数据集证实了先前关于丁丙诺啡剂量与“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”比值之间关联的研究结果。此外,本研究描绘了更清晰的关系,重点关注不同丁丙诺啡剂量组中“去甲丁丙诺啡”与“肌酐”的中位数比值。这些结果有助于医疗服务提供者更准确地解释尿液检测结果,并将其应用于门诊阿片类物质治疗项目以实现最佳治疗效果。