Waseem Muhammad, Morrissey Kirsten, Nelsen Ashley, Ata Ashar, Asad Hina
Department of Emergency Medicine, New York City (NYC) Health and Hospitals Lincoln Medical Center, New York City, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Feb 14;15(2):e34962. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34962. eCollection 2023 Feb.
The purpose of this study was to compare parents' perceptions of threats and solutions to school gun violence in two different communities.
Parents of school-aged children visiting emergency rooms of two large trauma centers in Upstate New York (UNY) and New York City (NYC), between October 2019 and December 2020, were surveyed (UNY: n=202, NYC: n=100). Responses were compared by site, firearm experience, and concern for school safety.
Respondents from the two sites differed by sociodemographic characteristics. Of the 302 respondents, 64% feared a school shooting incident, but UNY respondents were less likely to report concern (46.5% vs 99%, p<0.001). UNY respondents were more likely to feel safe for their children (75.3% vs 7%, p<0.001) and to report feeling safer if guns were available to teachers (22.3% vs 6%, p <0.001). Both sites' respondents agreed on the need for armed police presence (76.7% vs 74%, p=0.11). Of the 193 parents concerned about a school shooting, 11.9% indicated feeling safer if guns were available to teachers versus 25.7% of those who were not (p=0.002). Agreement on solutions for making schools safer differed by the site. NYC respondents were unanimously supportive, but UNY support ranged from 52% for metal detectors to 84.5% for controlled entry points.
Although perceptions of child safety and experience with guns varied by location, most parents agreed on potential solutions, that it should be the security officers, not teachers, who should be carrying firearms and that armed police should be present in schools to provide safety.
本研究的目的是比较两个不同社区的家长对校园枪支暴力威胁及解决方案的看法。
对2019年10月至2020年12月期间前往纽约州北部(UNY)和纽约市(NYC)两家大型创伤中心急诊室的学龄儿童家长进行了调查(UNY:n = 202,NYC:n = 100)。按地点、枪支经历和对校园安全的担忧对回复进行了比较。
两个地点的受访者在社会人口统计学特征方面存在差异。在302名受访者中,64%担心校园枪击事件,但UNY的受访者报告担忧的可能性较小(46.5%对99%,p<0.001)。UNY的受访者更有可能觉得自己的孩子安全(75.3%对7%,p<0.001),并且如果教师可以携带枪支,他们报告感觉更安全的比例更高(22.3%对6%,p <0.001)。两个地点的受访者都同意需要有武装警察在场(76.7%对74%,p = 0.11)。在193名担心校园枪击事件的家长中,11.9%表示如果教师可以携带枪支会感觉更安全,而在不担心的家长中这一比例为25.7%(p = 0.002)。对于使学校更安全的解决方案的共识因地点而异。NYC的受访者一致支持,但UNY的支持率从金属探测器的52%到控制入口点的84.5%不等。
尽管对儿童安全的看法和枪支经历因地点而异,但大多数家长在潜在解决方案上达成了一致,即应该是安保人员而不是教师携带枪支,并且学校应该有武装警察在场以提供安全保障。