Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 20;13(3):e065021. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065021.
To explore the acceptability of regular asymptomatic testing for SARS-CoV-2 on a university campus using saliva sampling for PCR analysis and the barriers and facilitators to participation.
Cross-sectional surveys and qualitative semistructured interviews.
Edinburgh, Scotland.
University staff and students who had registered for the testing programme (TestEd) and provided at least one sample.
522 participants completed a pilot survey in April 2021 and 1750 completed the main survey (November 2021). 48 staff and students who consented to be contacted for interview took part in the qualitative research. Participants were positive about their experience with TestEd with 94% describing it as 'excellent' or 'good'. Facilitators to participation included multiple testing sites on campus, ease of providing saliva samples compared with nasopharyngeal swabs, perceived accuracy compared with lateral flow devices (LFDs) and reassurance of test availability while working or studying on campus. Barriers included concerns about privacy while testing, time to and methods of receiving results compared with LFDs and concerns about insufficient uptake in the university community. There was little evidence that the availability of testing on campus changed the behaviour of participants during a period when COVID-19 restrictions were in place.
The provision of free asymptomatic testing for COVID-19 on a university campus was welcomed by participants and the use of saliva-based PCR testing was regarded as more comfortable and accurate than LFDs. Convenience is a key facilitator of participation in regular asymptomatic testing programmes. Availability of testing did not appear to undermine engagement with public health guidelines.
探索在大学校园使用唾液样本进行 PCR 分析进行常规无症状 SARS-CoV-2 检测的可接受性,以及参与的障碍和促进因素。
横断面调查和定性半结构式访谈。
苏格兰爱丁堡。
已注册参加测试计划(TestEd)并提供至少一份样本的大学教职员工和学生。
2021 年 4 月,522 名参与者完成了一项试点调查,2021 年 11 月,1750 名参与者完成了主要调查。48 名同意接受采访的教职员工和学生参加了定性研究。参与者对 TestEd 的体验评价很高,94%的人表示“优秀”或“良好”。参与的促进因素包括校园内的多个测试点、与鼻咽拭子相比,提供唾液样本的便利性、与侧向流动设备 (LFD) 相比的感知准确性,以及在校园内工作或学习时对测试可用性的保证。障碍包括在测试时对隐私的担忧、与 LFD 相比获得结果的时间和方法,以及对大学社区参与度不足的担忧。几乎没有证据表明,在 COVID-19 限制措施实施期间,校园内提供测试会改变参与者的行为。
在大学校园内免费提供 COVID-19 无症状检测受到参与者的欢迎,基于唾液的 PCR 检测被认为比 LFD 更舒适、更准确。便利性是参与常规无症状检测计划的关键促进因素。测试的可用性似乎并没有破坏对公共卫生指南的参与。